wow! very cool update Frits.
Frits, can you explain source to me? When I right click on a track, with no fx, auto, etc I see source and the choices are not something I understand. I see busses, instruments, Powercore, and Voxengo. None is a complete list.
Thanks
@sam c wrote:
Frits, can you explain source to me? When I right click on a track, with no fx, auto, etc I see source and the choices are not something I understand. I see busses, instruments, Powercore, and Voxengo. None is a complete list.
The Source submenu is what previously was labeled “Instrument/Return”. I changed it to the shorter “Source” because the mapping name is now appended to the submenu label.
@Zynewave wrote:
@sam c wrote:
Frits, can you explain source to me? When I right click on a track, with no fx, auto, etc I see source and the choices are not something I understand. I see busses, instruments, Powercore, and Voxengo. None is a complete list.
The Source submenu is what previously was labeled “Instrument/Return”. I changed it to the shorter “Source” because the mapping name is now appended to the submenu label.
ahhh. o.k. thanks.
Frits, if I right click on a track, in expanded mode, and insert an fx it does not show up in mixer view. if i use the inspector and drag the fx to the track it does show up in the mixer.
why is this?
Hi all,
Haven’t had much time to test and evaluate as we have a new addition to our family.
What I have seen so far though is very impressive! Well done Frits, happy 2.00th birthday.
Ben
@sam c wrote:
Frits, if I right click on a track, in expanded mode, and insert an fx it does not show up in mixer view. if i use the inspector and drag the fx to the track it does show up in the mixer.
why is this?
You mean the “Insert Effect Track” submenu? I tried that here, and the track appears as expected in the mixer. The mixer strip is by default hidden though, so the effect track is stacked on top of the audio track.
Thanks for the nice update! 😀
@Zynewave wrote:
You mean the “Insert Effect Track” submenu? I tried that here, and the track appears as expected in the mixer. The mixer strip is by default hidden though, so the effect track is stacked on top of the audio track.
the mixer is not hidden when i drag an fx to a track……….
so i just need to change the default….
thanks
@Zynewave wrote:
The mixer strip is by default hidden though, so the effect track is stacked on top of the audio track.
Frits, do i have to do this one track at a time (right click on track, uncheck hide mixer strip)? or is there a single place to change this default?
thanks
@sam c wrote:
@Zynewave wrote:
The mixer strip is by default hidden though, so the effect track is stacked on top of the audio track.
Frits, do i have to do this one track at a time (right click on track, uncheck hide mixer strip)? or is there a single place to change this default?
thanks
There is no place to modify this behaviour. All new effect tracks are by default created with a hidden mixer strip. This is also the case when you drag an effect mapping onto a track. How did you manage to create an effect track with a visible mixer strip by dragging the object?
Why do you want to show the strip for each effect?
frits, if i open the inspector, chose zynewave eq, and drag it to a guitar track it will show up in the mixer as a track before the guitar track.
i have enough screen space that i prefer to see the fx track with fx name before the track it is associated with.
i can change the hide mixer strip one track at a time but maybe there should be a place to modify this behavior? if i leave it like it is i have no immediate visual of what the plug in is on the track. the small bar on the track itself does not let you know anything except there is an fx on it.
or, are you saying you think each fx should have it’s own track? that will, however, take up quite a bit of screen space in the track arrangement view.
if i open the inspector, chose zynewave eq, and drag it to a guitar track it will show up in the mixer as a track before the guitar track.
Ok, I tried it again, and it will create a track with a visible mixer strip if you drop it on the left edge border. If you drop it on the center part of the track header it will create an effect track with a hidden mixer strip. That’s a bit incosistent, and something I’ll tidy up at some point. It’s been a while since I last used expanded mode.
If the only reason you show the mixer strip is to see more of the effect name, isn’t the best solution for you an option to specify the width of the mixer strips? That way you’ll be able to see the full effect name even with the mixer strip hidden.
@Zynewave wrote:
If the only reason you show the mixer strip is to see more of the effect name, isn’t the best solution for you an option to specify the width of the mixer strips? That way you’ll be able to see the full effect name even with the mixer strip hidden.
yes. or any option that would allow me to look at a track and see the name of each fx on the track….in expanded mode.