The problem is, websites such as these use other people’s reviews to base information from. There are no nerds or geeks involved. It’s simply trying to shift different bits of information and collaborate them. Sadly, this is not effective. The reviews for Podium that this information is based off, could be from 1.x for all we know. But where do we see that it’s out of date?
That is the true problem here. There are no claims there that the information is accurate, and they couldn’t; or else they’d need experts in each industry having to review all software for updates and changes.
Big software makes it better on these pages due to being well known, and therefore reviews are biased and/or based on versions that, as a big company, DO have a lot more features. It’s like the difference between selling occasional finished paintings, versus works in progress with the agreement to keep updating them. Podium has always been something that is continually worked on; that means snapshots at moments of time (i.e. reviews) will always be incomplete and misleading, at least to some degree.
.
