@Zynewave wrote:
The feature limitations in Podium Free are only those that are mentioned on the download page. In other words, the features covered in your questions 2..5 are not restricted in Podium Free.
1/ Yes, wav & aif.
2/ Yes.
3/ Very.
4/ It cannot be adjusted.
5/ Unlimited.
About the Reason/rewire question: I am not particularly familiar with Reason, so perhaps other users that are using Reason will chime in with some comments on that.
again thanx Fritz –
Hmmm, it does support 192k in Podium Free… double hmmm,
Let me check to make sure i have the audio set up correcrtly and I’m using the correct driver… probably why I’m not seeing it.
I need to get the full version anyway – I need that surround sound mixer!! 🙂
talk again next week sometime,
chase
@4mica wrote:
Hi Chase! I don’t think you were being too forward, you were only asking questions some of us may have been thinking about…but Frits is good as gold, the kind of guy I could not see bailing out any time soon. Podium is his baby, and our nephew (or something like that), no child abandonment issues here. Glad you’re on board mate-
Hey thanx 4mica – I was beginning to wonder there for a second.
Only a second but – a long second. ;0)
You seem to be a good group of people here on the forums as well,
more … hate to term … mature in nature maybe?
I don’t know the term exactly
I’m not a forum person by any means – usually due to the software flag wavers as I calll them… you know the type
– say anything about the app that goes against the grain or might be viewed as not waving a flag and cheering about it and they pounce all over the poster… you know the type I’m sure.
“Software Forum comandos”
But I don’t see that here at Zynewave Forums at least not yet – which spoke to me about the app and people using it- everybody is more relaxed about stuff in the forums it seems.
That’s really a big plus – in my book anyway and good to see.
Again thanx for the welcome and chiming in the way you did.
Gotta go as for now, be back online sometime next week, for now I’ve got some more discovering to do on the surround side and getting use to it’s layout – navigating it – etc etc but I’m having fun with it thus far.
@Zynewave wrote:
@chase wrote:
I take it you are are the Programmer – Developer of Podium?
Yes. I am the only person behind Zynewave.
What would you like to see happen with Podium?
Were do you see Podium in say 5yrs?Do you think you’l be taking it to a higher or the next level?
– staffing more people to handle the business side of things.
or help with programing etc etcDo you see Podium growing as a company business and software is what I’m asking i guess.
or will Podium slowly stagnate or turn into more of a programmers hobby kinda thing?
Podium has always been a hobby of mine. The last 5 years I’ve been fortunate to be able to work full-time on Podium. I’m not making enough money from Podium sales to continue with it full-time though. In the future I will need to find a more dependable source of income, which inevitably means I will get less hours per week for Podium development. That means returning to the way I developed Podium for the first 15 years of its existance. So I see myself continuing with Podium development in-definitely.
I gather from the different questions you’ve been asking, in other topics as well, that you are requiring a lot of specific features within surround-sound processing, etc. You should perhaps be looking at products such as Nuendo, or some of the other big players that has a wider range of features than Podium currently offers.
Ahhh – I see. Thought this might be a sole operator type thing. Nothing wrong with that at all. But helps me and perhaps others understand some things related to Podium as well.
The other software i mentioned at the beginning of this post is also run by a sole operater / developer.
I can certainly appriciate your postition. Having run a few bussiness in my past – completly understand where you are coming from as well as the problems and issues that arise being a sole owner operator.
I have a solution in part for you but – don’t want to share it here in the forums.
As far as the surround sound goes – I’m experimenting at this point with various panning techniques – and of course surround sound of varing types.
Your software offers up some great combos and options thus far as far as connections – speaker layouts etc etc.
I’ll look into Nuendo while I’m at it – but hope you don’;t mind if I continue looking at Podium… ;0)
There is too much i like about it to ignore it as viable solution.
Small pakages with a big bang – gotta love em.
The other developer i mentioned
– his apps are like wise small and powerfull.
Even some of the big boys mimiced some of his softwares features.
His problem was as well – he was the only one working on it and develped so many apps that he was overwelmed on the bussiness side of things.
We all understood and stood by him – but then it got to a point were he was making even that difficult for all of his loyal contributors from the onset of his software(s)
Not fun to buy into something when it goes that way – I’m sure you understand.
Personally I like the smaller independant companies
– and the big guys as well but…
Many times the independants create apps that can actually be better in many ways.
Better quality More focused
More obviouse features and perhaps even not as many “extra outside the focus features”, but what they do feature has more features
– more control given to the user. If you follow that ramble and my meaning.
Certainly they can be less bloated than some of the big dogs in the market.
Only draw back can be with independants at times
– as you mentioned – is being the only one workling on the application.
And the developer getting sooverwhelmed they can’t handle everything on their own
– or needs additional income, as in your case, in order to give the app your undivided attention.
thanks for replying and answering my questions
– I hope I wasn’t being to forward.
You certainly didn’t create a junk app as i call them.
what can i say – the more i open it the more i like it.
The features it has – are pretty full featured from what I’m seeing thus far.
I see more features in some areas than my other audio apps.
I’ll do what i can to help promo your app.
If i like something, i usually try to help out when i can in ways that i can.
Thanx Zynewave… this helps
btw sorry about the type-o double number 3 question header. glad you figured it out)
from Zynewave:
2/ You can’t. You’ll need to find a surround tool plugin that can handle individual channel gain, pan, mute and solo. I’m not familiar with the available surround plugins. I’ll probably develop such a plugin in a distant future.
Sounds real good Zynewave that would be a big plus!
AcousModules out of France highly recomended your software and they focus on Surround Sound vst modules.
They have a 5.1 leveler but not a 7.1 and mention their meters are not that accuate or it could the leveler sliders – or both not sure.
Either way I’m experimenting with 7.1 and 9.1 surround as well as 3d sound for stereo. Panning techniques in general
Thanx again for the info – if you hear of any surround vsts that you recommend – till you get yours made
– please post a link.
or anyone else for that matter
thanx again Zynewave
chase
Hope you don’t mind if I pipe in here as I’ve personally been asked about this and as a matter of fact am here looking at Podium due to some other apps connection requirements.
My answer to the poll question is infatically
No No No – Never.
A DAW is a DAW – not a browser and that is the way i treat my audio comp.
There are too many benifits for keeping a working DAW off line than on.
Same with any workstation – be them for Graphics Video etc etc.
The bad for connecting your DAW is obviouse – you may find yourself redoing your DAW or workstation due something you got off the internet.
Let alone the resouses used up by – apps calling home – updating in the middle of a project – and the ability that when your right in the middle of working on some new gunius project track – you don’t have to say no to your girlfriend who wants to check her emails at that moment.
It’s my personal preferance for a workstation anyway.
As for the manual – pdf works great! – love them – One can browse it at your leasure.
But an optional web based Help file would be a nice add.
Win Xp AMD 64×2
Hmmm…?
is it something I said or asked the reason for no reply?
I meant no offense – just simply inquiring.
Why is there an echo in here – here – here
Hello Hello Hello
Is there anybody out there? there? there?
❓
@Zynewave wrote:
Hi chase,
Sorry for the late reply. I hope you got my reply to your email yesterday. I’ve been busy with other matters the last couple of months, so my presence on the forum has been less frequent than usual. I hope things return to normal soon.
Frits
Hi Fritz and yes i recieved your email – and thanx
And thanx to those that replied with the character assessment on behalf of Fritz.
As mentioned in my email reply to you Fritz i have some questions regarding the capabilities of the Full version of Podium and will post them via the forum or do a search on the topics.
I take it you are are the Programmer – Developer of Podium?
Nice to hear from you.
May I ask – and I hope I’m not being out of line in asking but, just to further get a feel for where you are at and the direction of Podiums future.
What would you like to see happen with Podium?
Were do you see Podium in say 5yrs?
Do you think you’l be taking it to a higher or the next level?
– staffing more people to handle the business side of things.
or help with programing etc etc
Do you see Podium growing as a company business and software is what I’m asking i guess.
or will Podium slowly stagnate or turn into more of a programmers hobby kinda thing?
And again – I hope I’m not prying or putting you under the gun by asking.
thanx
chase
Hmmm – perhaps its the combo i had going – don’t know –
I’ll re-opend the project tonight and see exactly what i have in it
Edit:
Okay I opened up the project last night and this morning to try some things.
Got it to crash twice – though i think i know what the issue is – a vst was loading and i tried to delete the track.
Toxic in a second monitor window working fine now.
I have about 15 to 20 vsts in this project – none FXpansion so it could be any combo there of causing the issue i posted about.
I did notice one thing – i tried a new project with DrumAxx from Imageline.
used Drum in the editor and the Keys do not match with Drumaxx at all.
Drumaxx’s D5 is (gosh i hope i remeber correctly) G3 maybe?
Drumaxx’s C5 is Podiums C3
At any rate they do not jive at all.
I did download a demo from FXpansion as I’m familiar with there BFD2 and tried it in Podium – sure enough it didn’t close properly and as you mentioned you are already aware of this.
So what ever is causing the issue it’s probably the same thing as with FXpansions vst.
It doing the exact same thing with one of the plugins I’m using obviously.
So i take it when the fix comes for FXpansion vst’s so will it for which ever is also cusing it in my project.
Did you have a time frame of a fix or is this on FXpansion to fix it?
( which would mean it is on which ever plug-in I’m using that is causing the same issue for them to fix it as well is why I’m askling.)
Have another inquiry but will post another thread
end of edit
thanx for the reply and glad to hear you have it sorted out.
I’m using plugins from FL Studio: Direct wave – Toxic – Harmless
– two maybe three instances of some at times.
Any projection as to a fix now that you know what the issue is?
btw,
I was impressed with some of the features Zynwave has
Like the look and feel of it for sure – I miss some features of my other apps but you all are in your infancy still from what i understand.
definitly like alot you guys have though