Conquistador's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,598 total)
  • in reply to: Project Samples Management #20767
    Conquistador
    Participant

    While the timeframe since that older thread is some time ago…looking at that alone (time) can be misleading. Since that time (and before that) Frits has had to juggle close to 100’s of FR’s from various users maybe more.

    I have to say he is easily one of the most responsive devs out there but…he is only one man 😉

    He has to prioritise things and attempt to please everyone = an impossible task for anyone to achieve but he has IMO done an amazing job trying to keep everyone happy.

    I’ll put it another way…the number of FR’s he has implemented (many at short notice) far outwieghs this single FR not being implemented yet IMO. 🙂

    I really would love to see some way to auto copy data in Podium ASAP but…since I joined in 2005 I have witnessed a remarkable level of care, focus and design skill to match any dev. It might seem as if he simply ignored the FR but beleive me he has granted many FR requests since then. 🙂

    An FR might seem easy from the outside or small or one that should be a no.1 priority or similar but as the dev he has to make the final call on many different FR’s while maintaining the code base in a way that keeps everything stable an reliable. 🙂

    in reply to: Project Samples Management #20759
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @CymaticCreation wrote:

    This can be very troublesome for people making collaborations, mobile users, those with more than one machine, the list goes on and on…..

    Agreed.

    It has been a problem for me for a very long time. I know Frits to be fair has had many other FR’s (many of mine as well as others) that he has implemented in the past but hopefully he can re-visit this FR. I also brought it up previously on this thread.

    He has done an amazing job trying to implement user requests (sometimes at very short notice) over the years. I just hope he can slice out some time for this FR 🙂

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20750
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Conquistador wrote:

    At track level
    The only problem I see with this at track level where the error will appear is that a new user will not likely figure out how to solve this problem themselves. I would suggest if possible to add a prompt or additional text to the error message that pops up in the arrangement view that might say…

    “This mapping is already active on another track would you like to create a new instance?” With a simple OK / Cancel button option to choose from.

    I also should have said…that when the message pops up with the additional text, pressing ok should auto create a new instance of the plugin on the selected track. 😉

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20748
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Frits some observations…

    When I wanted to drag in another instance of Omnisphere (Global instance) I got the Error message telling me it is already active on another track. I normally don’t use more than one global instance of say Omnisphere or Trilian but…for the sake of testing Px64 out, I thought I would try. I was a bit puzzled about this but of course there are up to three options that will give me what I want (right clicking on the mapping from the project page listing), it just depends what I want to see in a new plugin instance. 😉

    At track level
    The only problem I see with this at track level where the error will appear is that a new user will not likely figure out how to solve this problem themselves. I would suggest if possible to add a prompt or additional text to the error message that pops up in the arrangement view that might say…

    “This mapping is already active on another track would you like to create a new instance?” With a simple OK / Cancel button option to choose from. Yes you can right click the instance in the inspector but…I was scratching my head for a bit. 😛 That additional text / prompt would snap in /lock the user experience in nicely. No need to sit wondering what that error means and or how to solve it :-k

    A few other things…

    1. The ZPEQ did not scan (after a previous successful scan) and crashed Podium but…when I attempted a re- scan there was no issue. I removed it from the quarantine list first. Works fine inside Podium.

    2. I got a few messages about J – Bridge not being able to run as Podium is not being run as an admin. This popped up as a result…

    “MLSemaphore…” I think is dev speak for “Yikes this code door needs to be closed asap?” 😀

    Once I changed that (admin rights) there was no problem. Not seen that pop up since the admin change or any other warnings about J- Bridge. All in all…great work Frits 8)

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20746
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Yes now at 90+ CPU here and it is still holding out. 🙂

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20744
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Update…

    Multiple Ozone 4 inserts with all six modules running on different tracks. I might try stacking them on the same tracks to see what happens 😛 Really…this is beyond what I would use Podium for. Hopefully more obvious things have not slipped through my testing net. With time permitting I cannot test everything but so far so good.

    Pushing 70% CPU now…Podium is still holding up. Saving and tweaking during playback tweaking just dragged in Lounge Lizard… 😉

    Might drag in a second instance of Omnisphere with 16 outputs and and 16 Midi inputs should I even be allowed to do that? 😆

    Audio Clip volume adjustment, fades all holding up…realtime MIDI editing…all good.

    Will try some automation….and push to 80% or 90% of CPU >gulp< 🙂

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20743
    Conquistador
    Participant

    i7 920
    RAM 12 GB
    W7 x64

    😉

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20741
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Beta 3 x64 testing….

    I did have a crash with Geist…but I am yet to repro that after multiple efforts to reproduce the crash. But I will certainly let you know if I can reproduce it.

    I am running a project (with native x64 plugs) that scales to about 30% of CPU but is running the Beta 3 x64 zPlugs, all three Spectrasonics plugs, Geist, Rapture, Z3ta+, Ozone 4, Sugabytes Turnado (add that to the list of tested x 64 plgus here), U-he Tyrell N6, AAS Ultra Analog, Inpdependence 2.5 e.t.c

    I am basically trying to work far beyond the way I normally would to try and see if Podium will do something it should not. To be honest considering most devs are likely to test their plugs with the major (or better known hosts out there instead of Podium) hosts, it is quite an achievement that I can use Podium this way it can remain crash free.

    So far so good here. I may have missed bugs that might appear in a different workflow but so far it appears pretty solid. Export / Render appears OK as well.

    Pushing the project further up CPU wise to see what happens…

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20705
    Conquistador
    Participant

    After a very quick test…not noticing much difference CPU wise. I would think that is because a greater difference might be seen between Podium x86 on Windows x86 (any flavour) and Podium x64 running on a similar version / flavour of Windows but on x64 with the same project and (x64 native) plugs.

    I am running Podium x86 and Podium x64 on the same OS (W7x64). That may be why there is not much difference. A percentage here or there either way is what I can see here.

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20699
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Looks the Rapture update solved the crashes with the plugin. :-k So far so good. 😉

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20698
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Cheers Frits 🙂

    Update…

    I have been getting consistent crashes with Cakewalk Rapture today. I could not figure out why this plugin alone would cause the app to crash. It scanned ok and passed my initial earlier tests. The windows error that pops up clearly lists Rapture as the cause. I have just checked the Cakewalk support areas for any update for the plug (long shot) and it does appear to have one (from last year).

    That update adds Windows 7 compatibility. Strange in a way as I cannot remember having issues with it in W7 before today. Anyway I am installing the Rapture update and will let you know if there are any more problems with the plug. 😉

    No issues with the other plugs still.

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20686
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Happy to report Geist x64 and Yellow Tools Independence 2.5 x64 also appear to run fine in Px64. 🙂

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20682
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Results Summary…
    Very smooth. No drama here. Had one incident where changing a patch in Trilian resulted in a glitch but to be honest it is probably not advisable to switch patches in such memory intensive plugs in real time with about 6 other VSTi’s running at the same time at a latency of about 4ms or less. 😉 🙂 Some of the Trilian patches take a bit of time to load I am guessing Trilian had not fully loaded the patch. Not able to repro the issue in any case.

    Smooth sailing so far. I think Geist now has an official X64 version (out of beta) so I will give that a run out in 2.43 as well as any other x64 plugs I do not have any more time to test today (Yellow tools Independence is another). Will probably post back tomorrow on those as these tests took much longer than I thought for today 😛

    in reply to: Preview 2.43: Podium x64 (for 64-bit Windows) #20681
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Did some *basic* quick stress testing…

    a. Processing Audio
    b. Automation ( with a select few)
    c. Saving during playback
    d. Dragging in, replacing and deleting FX and VSTi during playback
    e. MIDI Recording

    ..with the following x64 native plugs in my VST folder

    INSTRUMENTS

    Spectrasonics
    Omnisphere
    Trilian
    RMX

    Cakewalk
    Rapture
    z3ta+

    U-he
    TyrellN6 (amazing freebie by the way)

    AAS
    Ultra Analog
    Lounge Lizard

    FX

    Izotope

    Trash
    Ozone 4
    Spectron

    Voxengo
    SPAN
    Varisaturator
    Marvel
    Overtone
    Chrunchessor 2
    Gliss 3
    Stereo Touch
    Tube Amp

    Cytomic
    The Glue

    Team DNR
    Mix Control

    Nomad
    MAGNETIC
    Blue Tubes FX Pack
    Liquid Bundle II
    Studio Channel SC-226
    Echoes (demo)

    Nugen
    MonoFilter 4
    Steroizer 3
    Stereoplacer 3

    Liquid Sonics
    Reveberate

    AudioDamage
    Replicant

    Sugabytes
    Effectrix

    Tonebooster
    Various (demos)

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,598 total)
© 2021 Zynewave