kingtubby's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 419 total)
  • in reply to: solo/mute on return tracks #23179
    kingtubby
    Participant

    great – thanks πŸ™‚ I’m still learning stuff after all this time.

    in reply to: Excellent Pro Music Production Guide #23048
    kingtubby
    Participant

    Cheers, just watched it and I think I’m ready for the big time now.

    in reply to: New Pro Tools 11 Huge Improvements #22985
    kingtubby
    Participant

    @Jiri_Smolik wrote:

    I am feeling today’s DAWs have nowhere to go as it is turning around all new engines, stuff I do not understand and care and things that should be considered fixes instead.

    100% agree – the arguments focus on increasingly narrow points of debate.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    kingtubby
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: FRITS, WE NEED YOUR INPUT! #22825
    kingtubby
    Participant

    @druid wrote:

    Automatic plugin scanning at the start is trickier than it sounds, too, in my opinion. How does Podium know whether a plugin has been updated or not, whether it exists or not, and so on? You can look at files … but updated VSTs with the same filename, does it bother to check them? If so, it needs to read at least some of the VST to check version or other data. Or, you could use the file system’s last date modified, but then what if it’s not correct? What if it’s the same, and Podium skips it, and it turns out to have added parameters that you’ll miss because it wasn’t reimported?

    energyXT doesn’t do a plugin scan at all, it just lists any .dll files in your plugin folder. The plus is that you can add or remove plugins without the need for rescanning. The minus is that you’ll only know if a plugin is compatible/working once you try to load it.

    in reply to: Some Grainz, Anyone? #22668
    kingtubby
    Participant

    I really like granular synthesis and tried grainz a few years ago but failed to get anything pleasing (at least to my ears) out of it.
    I own granite which is by far my favourite and well worth the asking price.
    Smear is a new one to me and I thought I’d heard of everything granular, so thanks for that link.
    Also agreed about SKnote – some terrific stuff there at a very reasonable price – no demos though.

    in reply to: Best External Editor — Wavosaur or Audacity? #22667
    kingtubby
    Participant

    I prefer Wavosaur. I tried ocenaudio for a bit. It looks promising but is quite basic at the moment, plus the vst scan always crashed for me.

    in reply to: Wave Pitch editing? #22615
    kingtubby
    Participant

    A new time stretching library is available here:

    https://www.samplesumo.com/time-stretching

    There is a contact link on the page re. pricing

    in reply to: video EP of Sacred Sounds; bollywood album #22552
    kingtubby
    Participant

    thanks for sharing – love your sounds 8)

    in reply to: The Old JB VST Plugin Bundle is now freeware #22393
    kingtubby
    Participant

    I saw that too. Some great stuff in there – I bought RedPhatt Pro a few years ago and still use it a lot.

    in reply to: Free plugins to use in Podium #22392
    kingtubby
    Participant

    @Me le suono! wrote:

    You’re welcome! You propose topics for discussion very interesting!
    I had fun making a short video about this plugin in Podium Free:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8vXnoOxlzQ&feature=plcp

    It’s banal but I hope it can still be useful to someone! πŸ˜‰

    Good stuff Me le suono! Concise little tutorials like this are a real help to newcomers πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Plugin Overhaul Needed in Podium #22305
    kingtubby
    Participant

    Well, as it happens I agree with a lot of what you said there – plenty of valid points, and for what it’s worth, I don’t think your post (in this case) was too long. πŸ˜‰

    My issue was that you repeatedly bring up gripes with Podium which, though I’m sure are quite reasonable, don’t need to be raised at every opportunity.

    @Telenator wrote:

    Brevity in a highly technological age is a recipe for disaster

    I tend to disagree. It depends on how you define disaster in this context, but in my view we’re currently experiencing an acceleration in the continuum of the transition from the purely human to the purely technological. Whether you regard that as a disaster is debatable. In my view it is inevitable…hence, I think that brevity in communication is increasingly important.

    in reply to: Plugin Overhaul Needed in Podium #22289
    kingtubby
    Participant

    @The Telenator wrote:

    Sorry I didn’t respond in the short grunts and phrases that is more common on the internet today. I realise how painful it is to have to use your brain and read something. I suggest if you can’t cope with it there are lots of cartoons and such on the net that will entertain you without having to invest so much as one brain cell.

    Well done. Four lines is an improvement.

    To quote George Burns:

    β€œThe secret of a good sermon is to have a good beginning and a good ending; and to have the two as close together as possible.”

    Brevity, dear boy, brevity…

    in reply to: Plugin Overhaul Needed in Podium #22217
    kingtubby
    Participant

    oh look kids – another wall of text…sorry, I had to say it.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    kingtubby
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 419 total)
Β© 2021 Zynewave