Topic: Automation problem
- This topic has 69 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
Conquistador.
-
February 22, 2009 at 21:28 #14551
ZynewaveKeymaster@aMUSEd wrote:
Cool If it helps I’ve got a worse example here from this afternoon:

I was trying to automate mallet stiffness in Lounge Lizard to create a more organic feel but it wouldn’t even let me move off the zero for more than a second or two – every time I tried to get it where I wanted it to be it would snap back to zero – this time even though I was not moving to another param as in the example above – as you’ll appreciate I gave up as it was impossible.
Until the revised automation system is implemented: Place a marker event at the expected arrangement end. When you do the recording, the curve sequences will be set to that length, and you won’t get the snap to zero problems.
February 22, 2009 at 21:54 #14552
aMUSEdParticipantWell I normally don’t have a plan in mind for how long I mean to play but I suppose I can err on the side of caution for now. How do I set a marker event? (I don’t use those normally)
February 22, 2009 at 21:57 #14553
ZynewaveKeymaster@aMUSEd wrote:
Well I normally don’t have a plan in mind for how long I mean to play but I suppose I can err on the side of caution for now. How do I set a marker event? (I don’t use those normally)
Place the edit cursor at the desired position, and press Alt+M. Alternatively use the pencil tool or right-click on the marker lane (between the timeline ruler and the tempo event lane).
February 22, 2009 at 22:06 #14554
H-manParticipant@Zynewave wrote:
…or right-click on the marker lane (between the timeline ruler and the tempo event lane).
You can double-click there too π
February 22, 2009 at 22:24 #14555
aMUSEdParticipantHey that works π I suppose I could set up my default project with a marker set to say half an hour – would there be a downside to that? (not really sure what markers are for or why it makes such a difference)
February 22, 2009 at 22:35 #14556
ZynewaveKeymaster@aMUSEd wrote:
Hey that works π I suppose I could set up my default project with a marker set to say half an hour – would there be a downside to that? (not really sure what markers are for or why it makes such a difference)
In this case the marker is just a quick way of extending the arrangement length. You could have put any event on a track at that position to get a similar result. Don’t place the marker too far out though, as e.g. events on your bounce tracks will be set to this length as well.
Markers can be useful in splitting up your timeline in sections that you want to navigate between. You can use the Q/W key shortcuts to step the edit cursor between markers, or use the mouse-wheel over the marker lane to scroll between markers.
February 22, 2009 at 22:43 #14557
aMUSEdParticipant@Zynewave wrote:
@aMUSEd wrote:
Hey that works π I suppose I could set up my default project with a marker set to say half an hour – would there be a downside to that? (not really sure what markers are for or why it makes such a difference)
In this case the marker is just a quick way of extending the arrangement length. You could have put any event on a track at that position to get a similar result. Don’t place the marker too far out though, as e.g. events on your bounce tracks will be set to this length as well.
Oh, I wouldn’t want that (I’d get a big audio file with loads of silence).
Still at least it sounds like you know how to fix this now yes?
April 9, 2009 at 07:12 #14891
aMUSEdParticipantIs this going to be fixed yet?
April 9, 2009 at 10:02 #14893
ConquistadorParticipantIf it is a time issue then IMO I think you should feel quite free to take as long as you need Frits to address this problem (hopefully in 2.15). If it is a case of you perhaps wondering if it is *that* important then I think it is.
I have (as many others do of course) a list of features I think would further improve Podium but I would really like to see this particular issue revised above other FR’s personally.
Hopefully addressing it is not too complicated.
April 10, 2009 at 21:35 #14908
aMUSEdParticipantAbsolutely. No rush as such but I would like to see this prioritised. The fact is there are many features Podium doesn’t have yet and I’m sure they will add much to it, but this is one of the few things Podium already has but that doesn’t work properly and as such really should be attended to before moving onto other things.
April 11, 2009 at 02:18 #14911
ZynewaveKeymasterI’m currently doing some experimentation with a new automation system. Unless I encounter difficulties, there is a good chance that it will be ready for the next release. It’s a big job though, but I think I finally have figured out the best way to do it.
April 11, 2009 at 08:33 #14913
aMUSEdParticipantAwesome – you will have my eternal gratitude if you can get this working right
April 11, 2009 at 08:53 #14914
LiquidProj3ctParticipantI think it’ll be worth π
April 11, 2009 at 09:52 #14915
PiginiParticipant+1
Great your’e dealing with it already!!! Take all the time you need.April 11, 2009 at 13:56 #14919
ConquistadorParticipantGreat, thanks for coming back to this Frits!

- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
