Topic: BR: autoextending sequences
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 20 years ago by
Zynewave.
-
August 11, 2006 at 15:21 #898
PodianerParticipantHi Frits,
I don’t know if this can be called a bug or if it is on purpose but for me it is a very annoying behaviour.
When recording an audio sequence, I never keep the 1st take, thus I put the marker some bars back and try a new take. Podium then keeps playing back the part that is being overwritten at the same time. Thus you can hear your currently recorded signal and the signal, that was recorded before. Is it a bug or on purpose? ❓
And another thing: is it possible to turn of monitoring in Podium? I use the Toneport with zero latency, so I’d like to use it for monitoring my guitar.
Thx,
MaxAugust 11, 2006 at 22:10 #7260
ZynewaveKeymasterIs it a bug or on purpose?
It is on purpose, but I have often thought that it probably would be better to mute playback if it was being recorded over anyway. I’ll put this on the list.
And another thing: is it possible to turn of monitoring in Podium?
Could you give me more details?
August 11, 2006 at 22:59 #7261
PodianerParticipantCould you give me more details?
Simply the possibility to mute what is recorded by the mapping. As I think about it, I could mute the parent track right? 😉
Then this question was redundant.. 😳
August 12, 2006 at 16:16 #7263
PodianerParticipantSimply the possibility to mute what is recorded by the mapping. As I think about it, I could mute the parent track right?
Muting the parent track stops recording. But lowering the gain volume of the parent track is a kind of switching monitoring off. I always hear an echo during recording. The signal is delayed because of the latency, and at the same time, I can hear the signal, my external soundcard produces.
It is on purpose, but I have often thought that it probably would be better to mute playback if it was being recorded over anyway.
May I ask why you decided to do so? I mean, recording several takes is quite difficult when you hear your former mistakes during recording.
Just my 2 cents..
MaxAugust 12, 2006 at 21:45 #7266
ZynewaveKeymasterMay I ask why you decided to do so?
I didn’t do any coding to specifically achieve this, it was just a consequence of how the engine handles audio. I need to put in some code that skips playback on the track when recording is ongoing. If punch-in/out is used, then I think playback should only be muted within the punch range, which makes it more complicated.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
