Topic: Groups, Childs and Sends=Feedback on other tracks????

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • #2303
    Trancit
    Participant

    This is one thing, I don´t understand:

    I created a group track with 2 children…

    After the Group Track was a normal track (number 2) with 3 Sends on (all routed to the matching returns):
    1. Reverb
    2. Delay
    3. PingPong Delay

    On Childtrack 1, I inserted the Reverb send as well…all went fine
    After that, I inserted the Delay send…the Delay send on track 2 turned red with feedback warning

    I rearranged the order of the sends on Track 2 and all went normal…

    I guess, this is not as it should be 🙄

    Trancit

    #18814
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Sends must be placed in the same order on all tracks. This is a restriction to ensure plugin delay compensation will work correctly.

    #18828
    German Fafian
    Participant

    This is a hijack.!!!!
    While on the subject of child tracks and similar stuff;
    I seem to remember being able to drag the tracks not only up/down but also sideways to adjust them in the hierarchy tree.
    Like being able to create a track and set the rest or several of them as children of it.
    Am I off mark on this or something has changed?
    😯

    #18830
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    Yeah, that has changed with the new track layout. You can’t drag tracks onto each other or move them sideways to create a group at the moment. You can still drag tracks in and out of a group, which should also work with multiple tracks, once it’s possible to select them.

    Regarding the bus-order, I’ve asked about this before (quotes from another tread):

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    As it says…

    Error: The bus send is disabled as it could cause feedback elsewhere in the signal chain.
    Bus send instances must be placed in the same order on all tracks.

    I must confess I do not understand why this is so.

    Since bus sends “just” send to another track inside the hierarchy, where would the output of the bus feed the signal back?

    @Zynewave wrote:

    This would be doable, if I chose to ignore delay compensation rules in cases where the routing bites its own tail.

    Consider that you can insert plugins with latency between two sends on a track, and that you can have a bus return feed into effects with latency before being routed through another bus send. Thinking about it too long can give you a headache :-k

    I haven’t thought about it anymore after this warning – no need for headaches! 😡

    #18831
    German Fafian
    Participant

    OK.
    I just thought old age was starting to catch up with me 😆
    I work around it for the FX I want to achieve. 😈
    Later and thanks.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© 2021 Zynewave