Topic: Groups, Childs and Sends=Feedback on other tracks????
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
German Fafian.
-
July 11, 2010 at 00:19 #2303
TrancitParticipantThis is one thing, I don´t understand:
I created a group track with 2 children…
After the Group Track was a normal track (number 2) with 3 Sends on (all routed to the matching returns):
1. Reverb
2. Delay
3. PingPong DelayOn Childtrack 1, I inserted the Reverb send as well…all went fine
After that, I inserted the Delay send…the Delay send on track 2 turned red with feedback warningI rearranged the order of the sends on Track 2 and all went normal…
I guess, this is not as it should be 🙄
Trancit
July 12, 2010 at 22:55 #18814
ZynewaveKeymasterSends must be placed in the same order on all tracks. This is a restriction to ensure plugin delay compensation will work correctly.
July 13, 2010 at 11:57 #18828
German FafianParticipantThis is a hijack.!!!!
While on the subject of child tracks and similar stuff;
I seem to remember being able to drag the tracks not only up/down but also sideways to adjust them in the hierarchy tree.
Like being able to create a track and set the rest or several of them as children of it.
Am I off mark on this or something has changed?
😯July 13, 2010 at 12:43 #18830
thcilnnahojParticipantYeah, that has changed with the new track layout. You can’t drag tracks onto each other or move them sideways to create a group at the moment. You can still drag tracks in and out of a group, which should also work with multiple tracks, once it’s possible to select them.
Regarding the bus-order, I’ve asked about this before (quotes from another tread):
@thcilnnahoj wrote:
As it says…
Error: The bus send is disabled as it could cause feedback elsewhere in the signal chain.
Bus send instances must be placed in the same order on all tracks.I must confess I do not understand why this is so.
Since bus sends “just” send to another track inside the hierarchy, where would the output of the bus feed the signal back?
@Zynewave wrote:
This would be doable, if I chose to ignore delay compensation rules in cases where the routing bites its own tail.
Consider that you can insert plugins with latency between two sends on a track, and that you can have a bus return feed into effects with latency before being routed through another bus send. Thinking about it too long can give you a headache :-k
I haven’t thought about it anymore after this warning – no need for headaches! 😡
July 13, 2010 at 12:47 #18831
German FafianParticipantOK.
I just thought old age was starting to catch up with me 😆
I work around it for the FX I want to achieve. 😈
Later and thanks.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
