Topic: Is Midi vst effects support far away?

This topic has 18 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by rinxai.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)

1 2 →

June 20, 2009 at 11:22 #1960

DFusion
Participant

Hi Frits 😀
Will there be support for Midi vst in the near future?

June 20, 2009 at 14:47 #15377

kingtubby
Participant

@DFusion wrote:

Hi Frits 😀
Will there be support for Midi vst in the near future?

please, please Frits – my one wish for Podium 😀

June 21, 2009 at 08:00 #15380

Pigini
Participant

+1

June 21, 2009 at 08:27 #15382

LiquidProj3ct
Participant

This is important 🙂

June 21, 2009 at 13:15 #15386

Zynewave
Keymaster

Some of the features I have worked on the last months have pushed this a bit back. Would you say support for MIDI plugins is more important than time-stretching?

June 21, 2009 at 13:58 #15389

DFusion
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

Some of the features I have worked on the last months have pushed this a bit back. Would you say support for MIDI plugins is more important than time-stretching?

I wouldn’t say that Midi vst is more important since both of them are on my Wishlist 😀

But i have allot of midi Vst’s also so it would be nice to have support for them in podium.

June 21, 2009 at 16:03 #15390

Conquistador
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

Some of the features I have worked on the last months have pushed this a bit back. Would you say support for MIDI plugins is more important than time-stretching?

IMO while Midi VST fx would be a nice addition, Time stretching (at least IMO) is far more important. 🙂

I think most users expect Time stretching to be present in some form in even lesser priced hosts. Midi FX however are not so much of an expected feature or requested feature compared to timestretching based on what I have read in different forums.

Both are nice features but IMO timestretching is much more important at this time.

June 21, 2009 at 21:10 #15391

LiquidProj3ct
Participant

I would say ‘yes’ because you always can pitch shift /timestretch in a external audio editor.

I think MFX is something important, but not critical (critical was the automation bug as example, imo)

June 22, 2009 at 08:30 #15399

pavouk100
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

Some of the features I have worked on the last months have pushed this a bit back. Would you say support for MIDI plugins is more important than time-stretching?

Yes, at least for me 🙂 . Also making ‘composite track’ feature fully supported on MIDI tracks would be highly appreciated. Thanks.

June 22, 2009 at 09:29 #15401

Pigini
Participant

Totally agree with pavouk and liquid. I don’t use timestretching anywhere at all. I work everything in midi and do all changes affecting timing there. Usually I do a dry audio rendering of each track and then only work the effects, mixing and mastering with the audio data.

June 22, 2009 at 10:27 #15402

swindus
Participant

For me MIDI plugs are also more important than time stretching.

June 22, 2009 at 11:31 #15406

thcilnnahoj
Participant

Looks like I’m a minority here but for me it’s the other way around – no use for MIDI fx, keen on time-stretching. Ah, you win by numbers! 😛

June 22, 2009 at 11:34 #15407

Markus
Participant

@thcilnnahoj wrote:

Looks like I’m a minority here but for me it’s the other way around – no use for MIDI fx, keen on time-stretching. Ah, you win by numbers! 😛

+1

June 22, 2009 at 12:40 #15411

druid
Participant

Well since we’re making a poll on it now, I say audio-stretching more important! I use energyXT to do routing inside each track so I have all the MIDI ability I need. 😀

June 22, 2009 at 13:03 #15412

DFusion
Participant

@druid wrote:

Well since we’re making a poll on it now, I say audio-stretching more important! I use energyXT to do routing inside each track so I have all the MIDI ability I need. 😀

That is true but you can’t use midi controlled Vocoders or GSnap in realtime in Energyxt.