Topic: Now this might seem like a really stupid question…
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 7 months ago by
darcyb62.
-
September 22, 2006 at 02:48 #972
darcyb62ParticipantBut how do I pan a mono audio channel?
I can see the volume dial but I have no pan dial on track nor is it on the mixer.
September 22, 2006 at 07:15 #7721
ZynewaveKeymasterThe pan dial is on the track only if the parent track is stereo. If you e.g. have a mono effect mapping on the parent track, the pan dial is not shown.
September 22, 2006 at 15:02 #7722
darcyb62ParticipantOkay… I understand that…
How would I do this then?
I am recording an accoustic guitar, single mic in. I want to add fullness to it so I’m taking mutliple takes by turning the loop function on. I’ll do several takes (let’s say 5). I’ll listen to the indidual takes and pick out a few that sound decent and delete the rest. I then want to take each of these takes and position it in the stereo image.
As it sits I can’t do it. I tried wrapping each individual track in its own group track but that didn’t do it either. If I were to drop the stereo version of zEq I am assuming this would give me the panning on a individual track basis.
I guess if I were to add a stereo effect (like my favorite Ambience) on the group level that feeds these individual tracks it would give me the pan dial as well. Correct?
Darcy
September 22, 2006 at 15:16 #7723
ZynewaveKeymasterAs it sits I can’t do it.
By that, I assume that you are using a mono effect on the group track? The pan dial is hidden in this case, because there is no point in panning the signals when they are going to be summed into mono on the group track. You need to use a stereo effect if you want to pan the signal before applying the effect.
September 22, 2006 at 16:02 #7724
darcyb62Participant@Zynewave wrote:
As it sits I can’t do it.
By that, I assume that you are using a mono effect on the group track? The pan dial is hidden in this case, because there is no point in panning the signals when they are going to be summed into mono on the group track. You need to use a stereo effect if you want to pan the signal before applying the effect.
That’s correct… But at that point in the signal chain all I wanted to do is pan the signal. I don’t want it “effected” in any other manner.
So let me get this right… The only way to turn a mono track into a stereo track is to run it through a stereo effect. What if (and this might just be me being a bit anal here) but what if I ran no effects through the whol chain (not really likely)? There would be no way to pan tracks appropriately in the master. Everything would sit right smack in the middle. Is this correct?
September 22, 2006 at 16:10 #7725
ZynewaveKeymasterSo let me get this right… The only way to turn a mono track into a stereo track is to run it through a stereo effect.
More precisely; to run it through a stereo mapping. If you have no effects on your tracks, then the closest parent mapping is the master output, and if this is stereo, then you can pan each audio track.
September 22, 2006 at 16:23 #7726
darcyb62ParticipantGotcha…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
