Topic: Preview 2.09: Piano roll editor updates

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 140 total)
  • #14008
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Beta5:

    Resizing a note event by dragging either the start or the end of the note will resize all notes in a multiple note selection. The resizing is done in realtime instead of on mouse release.

    The suggestion of a resize option dialog on mouse release is not practical, as the resizing is now done in realtime. Support for proportional/percent resizing could be implemented either by an alternative key shortcut on clicking, or by adding a new “Split/Resize Note Events” dialog. This dialog can have a number of different edit options. One of these could be “resize notes” with a related percentage value input box. Another edit option could be “split notes into even slices” with a value input box. That satisfies a previous FR on this thread. Other edit options could be “split notes on quantize grid”, “split notes at edit cursor”, etc.

    #14009
    kingtubby
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Beta5:

    Resizing a note event by dragging either the start or the end of the note will resize all notes in a multiple note selection. The resizing is done in realtime instead of on mouse release.

    Thanks Frits – that’s one feature I’ve been waiting a while for 🙂

    Mart.

    #14010
    LiquidProj3ct
    Participant

    Hi Frits, I’ve trying multiple resizing but, honestly, it’s a little weird.

    1. The minimun note lenght should be the piano roll snap if it’s enabled, and no zero. Usually people don’t use “clicks” sounds! Another related problem: imagine that you have a chord in the start of a clip and it’s reduced to zero, you cannot select it

    2. Podium forces notes to snap when resizing. This is a BIG problem. If you have some 1/8 notes, and a 1/8 dotted note, if you get longer all them and the snap is in 1/8, the 1/8 notes would be 1/4 notes, and the 1/8 dotted would be 1/4 notes also!!! (when its lenght should be a 1/4+1/16). This also is a problem when you have the notes with a starting quantization, you would lose the quantization!

    Best regards 😉

    #14022
    druid
    Participant

    Hm.

    I don’t know about others, but I usually relatively move notes. So, if you have a multiple of 1/6 note and a multiple of 1/8 note (multiple I mean mathematically, so the quantizationo for that note..), then select both and extend them by 1 bar, they would be one bar longer, but not snap to current quantization.

    Of course, there are uses for both.

    #14024
    Pigini
    Participant

    first things first
    about feat. introduced in beta 4:

    the quick button panel, when used with the pencil tool is not as good as it could be. it really only mirrors, what could be done with the selector box on top. (it’s quicker, but it could be so much more).

    the quickbuttons should set the (fixed) duration for the next notes to be drawn. that’s what I had in mind for them.
    as long as the 1/8-button is selected, I always want to draw an 1/8 value, no matter what the last drawn (and possibly edited) note was, no matter what the snap setting is.

    edit: actually drawing is not the word, I want to pick&put (select in the quick button panel and put it in with a time based snap guidance, independent from the notes duration)

    in many cases, the snap implementation, as it is now, is an obstacle for quickly drawing notes, the way you want them. it sets kind of a grid for durations.
    IMHO an additional snap setting, a snapping to timing, could fix that.
    maybe change the snap button to a selector box, where first choice:none, second choice: the usual, third choice: snap time. on that option, the selector box with the note lengths on top would define a snap grid, to which time values of drawn notes (selected with the quick buttons on the left) would snap.
    or change the way the top selector works if quick buttons are selected to be shown.
    Example:
    snap option: snap time
    selection in top selector: 1/8
    choose any note button from the quickbutton list and draw that note, having it snapped to time positions in a 1/8 snap grid.
    It does not necessarily need to be done like that.
    But the aim is, having quickbutton note values snapped to chosen timing positions, rightaway when drawing.

    the main idea with the quick buttons was to have predefined notes, that can be placed at the right timing in pencil mode without the need for editing.

    in selection mode, the editing using the quick buttons works excellently.

    #14025
    Pigini
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Hi Frits, I’ve trying multiple resizing but, honestly, it’s a little weird.

    1. The minimun note lenght should be the piano roll snap if it’s enabled, and no zero. Usually people don’t use “clicks” sounds! Another related problem: imagine that you have a chord in the start of a clip and it’s reduced to zero, you cannot select it

    But as long as you have not deselected it, you can still change it, the notes still seem to “know” their initial values.
    I noticed with snap enabled, it depends which note you grab and drag.
    Grab the shortest one and it cant get shorter than the snap value.

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    2. Podium forces notes to snap when resizing. This is a BIG problem. If you have some 1/8 notes, and a 1/8 dotted note, if you get longer all them and the snap is in 1/8, the 1/8 notes would be 1/4 notes, and the 1/8 dotted would be 1/4 notes also!!! (when its lenght should be a 1/4+1/16). This also is a problem when you have the notes with a starting quantization, you would lose the quantization!

    Yes, the behaviour with snap enabled works a bit like the absolute option in some other hosts. If you dont want that, you would only have to deselect snap, the visual grid is a good guide to see where you are. The way Frits implemented it makes good use of the snap option when resizing and an additional option for absolute changes is not needed.

    #14026
    Pigini
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    The suggestion of a resize option dialog on mouse release is not practical, as the resizing is now done in realtime.

    That was only how another host did it. Only wanted to mention, that there are different ways a resize could be done.
    @Zynewave wrote:

    Support for proportional/percent resizing could be implemented either by an alternative key shortcut on clicking, or by adding a new “Split/Resize Note Events” dialog. This dialog can have a number of different edit options. One of these could be “resize notes” with a related percentage value input box. Another edit option could be “split notes into even slices” with a value input box. That satisfies a previous FR on this thread. Other edit options could be “split notes on quantize grid”, “split notes at edit cursor”, etc.

    Oh yes, please. 🙂
    I really would like to have that options.
    … all of them, the proportional/percent resizing and the splitting.
    an extra key shortcut for the proportional resizing would be very practical too. Brilliant.

    #14027
    LiquidProj3ct
    Participant

    @Pigini wrote:

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Hi Frits, I’ve trying multiple resizing but, honestly, it’s a little weird.

    1. The minimun note lenght should be the piano roll snap if it’s enabled, and no zero. Usually people don’t use “clicks” sounds! Another related problem: imagine that you have a chord in the start of a clip and it’s reduced to zero, you cannot select it

    But as long as you have not deselected it, you can still change it, the notes still seem to “know” their initial values.
    I noticed with snap enabled, it depends which note you grab and drag.
    Grab the shortest one and it cant get shorter than the snap value.

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    2. Podium forces notes to snap when resizing. This is a BIG problem. If you have some 1/8 notes, and a 1/8 dotted note, if you get longer all them and the snap is in 1/8, the 1/8 notes would be 1/4 notes, and the 1/8 dotted would be 1/4 notes also!!! (when its lenght should be a 1/4+1/16). This also is a problem when you have the notes with a starting quantization, you would lose the quantization!

    Yes, the behaviour with snap enabled works a bit like the absolute option in some other hosts. If you dont want that, you would only have to deselect snap, the visual grid is a good guide to see where you are. The way Frits implemented it makes good use of the snap option when resizing and an additional option for absolute changes is not needed.

    Hey man, instead of dragging multiple notes simultaneously, I can drag them individually also in order to change their lenghts. But that’s not the idea. I think that the idea of interface is make it easy & functional, and those are my suggestions for do it easy and ‘workflowable’.

    Best regards 🙂

    #14028
    Pigini
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Hey man, instead of dragging multiple notes simultaneously, I can drag them individually also in order to change their lenghts. But that’s not the idea. I think that the idea of interface is make it easy & functional, and those are my suggestions for do it easy and ‘workflowable’.

    What you want sounds like the afforementioned proportional scale(each selected note scaling equally in percent). Is it that what you want?

    Frits hasn’t implemented that (yet), but offered it as an option.
    What is implemented now, is:
    If you make one note longer by 1/8, all selected notes get added the 1/8 amount to their value. Does not matter wether snap is on or not, you’re always adding the same absolute amount to the basic value. Works the same way with subtraction too.

    I would prefer having the proportional scaling as the default behaviour and the equal adding of the same value as a second option. I do need the proportional scaling much more often, just like you seem to.

    #14038
    Conquistador
    Participant

    The new buttons are great…but…. 🙂 is it possible to move the buttons into a horizontal position instead or at least allow a user to optionally move them please?

    There is so much space on the top right area of the PR. The buttons would be directly above the PR and the notes that of course would be directly affected. Seems much more easier to access than the current position *behind* the keys??!?? A bit confused by that sorry. 😕

    To illustrate…

    Another example…

    It is far easier to access the buttons in the image above. They of course directly affect the note information below. IMO this makes the buttons and the features they provide far more easily accessible.

    The space where the buttons are now would be put to far better use with the Event view placed there, that is hidden away and would be far better used next to the PR and the data you can see. FR’d back on page 5 of this thread.

    #14040
    Pigini
    Participant

    Oh yes, the mockup is a great example of how much better a picture can explain some things.
    If I’m not mistaken, your first selector would allow to select the snap grid value (what I called time snap), then there are the quick note buttons, and a seperate quantize on/off button for snapping to duration aswell?

    So I could achieve what I want by choosing my snap grid, selecting my quick note buttons and off I go placing them snapped to the desired timings, without getting an unwanted quantization.
    That kind of unlocking time and duration snap might work better for the scale function too.

    That’s it.
    Agree, the buttons would be more accessible in most cases, if they where at the top. Though, I liked them at the left aswell, esp when using the new velocity check on the keys. An undockable floating panel would be ideal for the shortest mouse movements and could speed up the input quite a bit in the long run.

    #14044
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    1. The minimun note lenght should be the piano roll snap if it’s enabled, and no zero. Usually people don’t use “clicks” sounds! Another related problem: imagine that you have a chord in the start of a clip and it’s reduced to zero, you cannot select it

    The new beta6 sets a minimum note length if snap is on.

    Further additions to beta6:

    When inserting new notes by double-clicking with the select tool or by single-clicking with the pencil tool, before releasing the mouse button you can drag left/right to resize or up/down to adjust velocity. This depends on the two “alt+click+drag” options in the piano roll properties.

    New options in the piano roll properties dialog:
    “Alt+Double-click+Drag to resize proportionally”
    “Create clone of selected note with pencil tool”


    @Pigini
    : By disabling that last option you will always add notes of the set quantize length.

    #14046
    LiquidProj3ct
    Participant

    Thanks you Frits, now it’s much more comfortable work with it 🙂

    However, I was working in a song and my cell phone ringed. When I come back I saw this:

    The text:

    OS: Windows XP Home Edition, SP3
    CPU: GenuineIntel, Intel P6 (Model 14), MMX @ 1990 MHz

    Module name: C:Archivos de programaZynewavePodiumPodium209_beta6.exe

    Application data:
    VmVyc2lvbjogV2tkT0lrZHNjMnBwYW1kaVluVlZKQ2xTT0NZck9pQXN
    QU0V1UGxJak1CMGJTaU04SnpOMllYeDVjalluSXpZb0tEbFlmMjk2UV
    RBOVJsZHpmbmhGRFcxSVRFY0RjRXRDVVZKSFZFSjZCZz09DQpJbWFnZ
    UJhc2U6IDM4MTMwMDAwDQotMQ0KQ29kZSA9IFsxMTRdDQotIDIyMQ0K
    LSAwDQotIDIxNw0KLSAwDQotIFtdDQo+IEM6XEFyY2hpdm9zIGRlIHB
    yb2dyYW1hXFp5bmV3YXZlXFBvZGl1bVxQb2RpdW0yMDlfYmV0YTYuZX
    hlDQoNClp5bmV3YXZlDQpaeW5ld2F2ZSBQb2RpdW0NCjIuMDkNClBvZ
    Gl1bQ0KQ29weXJpZ2h0IKkgMTk5MC0yMDA5IFp5bmV3YXZlDQpQb2Rp
    dW0uZXhlDQoyLjA5DQpQb2RpdW0NCg0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3R
    lbTMyXG50ZGxsLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXGtlcm
    5lbDMyLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXFdJTk1NLmRsb
    A0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXEFEVkFQSTMyLmRsbA0KPiBD
    OlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXFJQQ1JUNC5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9
    XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxTZWN1cjMyLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3
    RlbTMyXEdESTMyLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXFVTR
    VIzMi5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xXaW5TeFNcWDg2X01pY3Jvc29m
    dC5XaW5kb3dzLkNvbW1vbi1Db250cm9sc182NTk1YjY0MTQ0Y2NmMWR
    mXzYuMC4yNjAwLjU1MTJfeC13d18zNWQ0Y2U4M1xDT01DVEwzMi5kbG
    wNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxtc3ZjcnQuZGxsDQo+IEM6X
    FdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcU0hMV0FQSS5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9X
    U1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxWRVJTSU9OLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3R
    lbTMyXE1TSU1HMzIuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcY2
    9tZGxnMzIuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcU0hFTEwzM
    i5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxvbGUzMi5kbGwNCj4g
    QzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxNU1ZDUDYwLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5
    ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXElNTTMyLkRMTA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3
    RlbTMyXG15b2tlbnQuZGxsDQoNCkphbWllIE8nQ29ubmVsbA0KTUlES
    SBZb2tlIEp1bmN0aW9uIE5UDQoxLjc1LjAuMDUzDQpNWU9LRU5ULkRM
    TA0KQ29weXJpZ2h0IKkgMTk5NS0yMDA3IGJ5IEphbWllIE8nQ29ubmV
    sbA0KTVlPS0VOVC5ETEwNCjEuNzUuMC4wNTMNCk1JREkgWW9rZSBKdW
    5jdGlvbiBOVA0KDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcTVNDVEYuZ
    GxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcU0VUVVBBUEkuZGxsDQo+
    IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcbXNjdGZpbWUuaW1lDQo+IEM6XFd
    JTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJceHBzcDJyZXMuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1
    Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcV0lOVFJVU1QuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzd
    GVtMzJcQ1JZUFQzMi5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxN
    U0FTTjEuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcSU1BR0VITFA
    uZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcd2RtYXVkLmRydg0KPi
    BDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXG1zYWNtMzIuZHJ2DQo+IEM6XFdJT
    kRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcTVNBQ00zMi5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xz
    eXN0ZW0zMlxtaWRpbWFwLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTM
    yXFV4VGhlbWUuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcQ0xCQ0
    FUUS5ETEwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxDT01SZXMuZGxsD
    Qo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcT0xFQVVUMzIuZGxsDQo+IFxc
    P1xDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXFJkYXMxMDYxLmRsbA0KIA0KUm9
    sYW5kIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uDQogDQo1LCAwLCAzLCAwDQogDQpDb3B5cm
    lnaHQgKEMpIDIwMDQgUm9sYW5kIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uDQogDQogDQo1L
    CAwLCAzLCAwDQogDQogDQogDQoNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0z
    MlxSZVdpcmUuZGxsDQoNClByb3BlbGxlcmhlYWQgU29mdHdhcmUgQUI
    NClJlV2lyZQ0KMS43DQpSZVdpcmUNCkNvcHlyaWdodCBQcm9wZWxsZX
    JoZWFkIFNvZnR3YXJlIEFCIDE5OTktMjAwNiwgQWxsIHJpZ2h0cyByZ
    XNlcnZlZA0KUmVXaXJlLmRsbA0KMi41DQpSZVdpcmUNCg0KPiBDOlxB
    cmNoaXZvcyBkZSBwcm9ncmFtYVxWc3RwbHVnaW5zXEdsYWRpYXRvci5
    kbGwNCg0KVG9uZTIuY29tIEF1ZGlvc29mdHdhcmUNClRvbmUyIEdsYW
    RpYXRvciBWU1QgU3ludGhlc2l6ZXINCjIsIDAsIDAsIDANCkdsYWRpY
    XRvcg0KQ29weXJpZ2h0IKkgVG9uZTIgQXVkaW9zb2Z0d2FyZSAyMDA3
    DQpUb25lMg0KR2xhZGlhdG9yLmRsbA0KMiwgMCwgMCwgMA0KVG9uZTI
    gR2xhZGlhdG9yIFZTVCBTeW50aGVzaXplcg0KDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1
    Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcV1MyXzMyLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3Rlb
    TMyXFdTMkhFTFAuZGxsDQo+IEM6XEFyY2hpdm9zIGRlIHByb2dyYW1h
    XFZzdHBsdWdpbnNcRmlyZUJpcmQuZGxsDQoNClRvbmUyIEF1ZGlvc29
    mdHdhcmUNCkZpcmViaXJkIER5bmFtaWMgTGluayBMaWJyYXJ5IChETE
    wpDQoxLCA5LCAwLCAwDQpUb25lMiBGaXJlYmlyZCsNCkNvcHlyaWdod
    CCpIDIwMDcNCkZpcmViaXJkLmRsbA0KMSwgOSwgMCwgMA0KIEZpcmVi
    aXJkIER5bmFtaWMgTGluayBMaWJyYXJ5IChETEwpDQoNCj4gQzpcQXJ
    jaGl2b3MgZGUgcHJvZ3JhbWFcVnN0cGx1Z2luc1xTeWxlbnRoMVxTeW
    xlbnRoMS5kbGwNCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubGVubmFyZGlnaXRhbC5jb20NC
    kxlbm5hckRpZ2l0YWwNClN5bGVudGgxIFZTVGkgUGx1Zy1Jbg0KMiwg
    MiwgMCwgMg0KU3lsZW50aDENCkNvcHlyaWdodCCpIDIwMDggTGVubmF
    yRGlnaXRhbA0KU3lsZW50aDEuZGxsDQoyLCAyLCAwLCAyDQpTeWxlbn
    RoMQ0KDQo+IEM6XEFyY2hpdm9zIGRlIHByb2dyYW1hXFZzdHBsdWdpb
    nNcUG9pc2UuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcbXByLmRs
    bA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXG9sZXBybzMyLmRsbA0KPiB
    DOlxBcmNoaXZvcyBkZSBwcm9ncmFtYVxWc3RwbHVnaW5zXElMIERlbG
    F5IEJhbmsuZGxsDQoNCkltYWdlLUxpbmUgYnZiYQ0KMi4xLjAuMA0KR
    GVsYXkgQmFuaw0KQ29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAyMDA2LTIwMDggSW1hZ2Ut
    TGluZSBidmJhLiBBbGwgcmlnaHRzIHJlc2VydmVkLg0KMi4xDQpJTCB
    EZWxheSBCYW5rDQoNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeXN0ZW0zMlxoaGN0cm
    wub2N4DQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcbXVpXDBjMGFcaGhjd
    HJsdWkuZGxsDQo+IEM6XFdJTkRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcd3NvY2szMi5k
    bGwNCj4gQzpcQXJjaGl2b3MgZGUgcHJvZ3JhbWFcSW1hZ2UtTGluZVx
    TaGFyZWRcRFNQX0lQUFxEU1BfSVBQLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxBcmNoaXZvcy
    BkZSBwcm9ncmFtYVxaeW5ld2F2ZVxQb2RpdW1cVnN0cGx1Z2luc1xae
    W5ld2F2ZSBFZmZlY3RzXFp5bmV3YXZlIHpSZXZlcmIuZGxsDQo+IEM6
    XEFyY2hpdm9zIGRlIHByb2dyYW1hXFZzdHBsdWdpbnNcV2FybXZlcmI
    uZGxsDQoNClRvbmUyLmNvbSBBdWRpb3NvZnR3YXJlDQpUb25lMiBXYX
    JtdmVyYiBNdWx0aSBGWCBWU1QgcGx1Zy1pbg0KMSwgMCwgMSwgMA0KV
    2FybXZlcmINCkNvcHlyaWdodCCpIDIwMDggYnkgVG9uZTINClRvbmUy
    DQpXYXJtdmVyYi5kbGwNCjEsIDAsIDEsIDANClRvbmUyIFdhcm12ZXJ
    iIE11bHRpIEZYIFZTVCBwbHVnLWluDQoNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xzeX
    N0ZW0zMlx3aW5zcG9vbC5kcnYNCj4gQzpcQXJjaGl2b3MgZGUgcHJvZ
    3JhbWFcVnN0cGx1Z2luc1xUb3hpYyBCaW9oYXphcmQuZGxsDQpUb3hp
    YyBCaW9oYXphcmQgdjEuMC4xIFZTVGkvRkxpDQpJbWFnZS1MaW5lDQp
    Ub3hpYyBCaW9oYXphcmQgdjEuMC4xIFZTVGkvRkxpDQoxLCAwLCAxLC
    AyDQpUb3hpYyBCaW9oYXphcmQgdjEuMC4xIFZTVGkvRkxpDQpDb3B5c
    mlnaHQgKEMpIDIwMDggSW1hZ2UtTGluZQ0KVG94aWMgQmlvaGF6YXJk
    LmRsbA0KMSwgMCwgMSwgMg0KVG94aWMgQmlvaGF6YXJkIHYxLjAuMSB
    WU1RpL0ZMaQ0KDQo+IEM6XEFyY2hpdm9zIGRlIHByb2dyYW1hXEltYW
    dlLUxpbmVcRG93bmxvYWRlclxmbGRvd25sb2FkLmRsbA0KDQpJbWFnZ
    S1MaW5lIGJ2YmENCkRvd25sb2FkZXINCjIsIDEsIDAsIDANCmRvd25s
    b2FkDQpDb3B5cmlnaHQgKEMpIDIwMDUtMjAwOCBJbWFnZS1MaW5lIGJ
    2YmEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVzZXJ2ZWQuDQpkb3dubG9hZC5kbGwNCj
    IsIDEsIDAsIDANCklMIENvbnRlbnQgTGlicmFyeQ0KDQo+IEM6XFdJT
    kRPV1Ncc3lzdGVtMzJcbXN2ZnczMi5kbGwNCj4gQzpcV0lORE9XU1xz
    eXN0ZW0zMlx3aW5pbmV0LmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTM
    yXE5vcm1hbGl6LmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXGllcn
    R1dGlsLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXG9wZW5nbDMyL
    mRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXEdMVTMyLmRsbA0KPiBD
    OlxXSU5ET1dTXHN5c3RlbTMyXEREUkFXLmRsbA0KPiBDOlxXSU5ET1d
    TXHN5c3RlbTMyXERDSU1BTjMyLmRsbA==

    However Podium didn’t crash.

    Best regards

    EDIT: After close these windows, Podium closed itself without ask

    #14047
    Pigini
    Participant

    @Pigini wrote:

    Agree, the buttons would be more accessible in most cases, if they where at the top. Though, I liked them at the left aswell, esp when using the new velocity check on the keys. An undockable floating panel would be ideal for the shortest mouse movements and could speed up the input quite a bit in the long run.

    First time, I’m quoting myself. Probably not the first time contradicting myself, though…. 😉

    About placing the buttons on top:
    surely there is enough space at the top menu when your’e on widescreens, but overhere my toolbar gets cut off already when using my tablePC with portrait mode (It’s like an A4-sheet of paper held upright, there is a landscape mode too, but portrait is better to hold). Can’t see the end of the segment view. I do have a scrollbar, though. Seems like the piano roll is getting where the screen ends and the menu bar doesn’t.

    So essentially, quickbuttons on top would make things difficult for me, as long as the menu can’t wrap around. Floating panel or left from the piano roll (as it is now) would work.

    @Frits:
    Is there a way to make podium aware where the screen really ends, when having such a non-standard situation? I wouldn’t mind if the menu wrapped to a second row, as long as the menu does not end in nomansland.

    #14048
    Pigini
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    New options in the piano roll properties dialog:
    “Alt+Double-click+Drag to resize proportionally”
    “Create clone of selected note with pencil tool”

    In piano roll properties, we have the Note event action Alt+Click+Drag left/right to resize.
    We can do that without Alt already, at least in pencil mode.
    In select mode Alt+Click+Drag up/down resizes the velocities.

    Alt+Double-click+Drag to resize proportionally
    Find the double clicking and dragging a bit hard to do (always tend to release the second click). Could the default behaviour get changed or reassigned? How about having selectable shortcut options like the pencil tool actions above? I would like to be able to make the proportional resize the default behaviour, where I don’t need to press additional keys at all. Most of the time, I need the proportional resize.
    @Zynewave wrote:


    @Pigini
    : By disabling that last option you will always add notes of the set quantize length.

    Ah, that’s much better. Takes care of always putting the last drawn value in. Thanx 🙂 Good achievement/effort ratio, btw.

    However, timing snap and quantize snap are still locked together.
    Maybe it would be beneficial for other (future) functions too, to disentagle them. It’s keeping us from getting the best possible input options.

    Here is what we can do now:
    – Quickly put in standard notes, with and without snap.
    – Snap places a hidden grid into the bar, that limits the chosen notes to be placed only at time positions, that are multiples of their own value (IMHO, that’s an unnecessary limitation).
    – We can choose a shorter note value with snap to get a finer grid and then draw the note longer. By that we can place a 1/4 note after a 1/16 rest.
    – We can choose a shorter note value with snap to get a finer grid, place the notes at the right timings and then Alt+Click on quick note buttons to change their length quickly to what we want.
    – We can quickly put in standard notes, roughly estimating the rests we want inbetween, then select them and quickly quantize their timings to a chosen start position. Works ok somehow, if one is good at guessing.

    Compared to how it was before, we already have much more creative options now, and all without unlocking time snap from quantize.
    But coming all the way, wouln’t it be worth considering doing the final step into town?

    Here is what we can’t do:
    – something like snapping to 1/16 values directly when putting any chosen quick note in, or something like choosing a quarter with snap on and letting it “syncopade” into the next bar.

    The second editing stage, we often need now, could be avoided, if we could directly put in defined notes onto a snap grid, different from the chosen note value.

    What Conquistador did in his mockup shows a good possible solution for that.
    1. selector for (time) snap grid
    2. quick note values
    3. Quantize on/off (could be just Q for taking up lesser space).

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 140 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© 2021 Zynewave