Topic: Preview 2.20: Various UI improvements

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 131 total)
  • #15996
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    Though it’s a trade-off, you might want to set a minimum height for the embedded editor and mixer in the default setup. I was fooling around a bit and accidentally moved the mouse during double-clicking the editor’s header while it was minimized, click-dragging it instead just one or two pixels up. That resulted in not being able to open it anymore by F6 or double-click but had to drag it up to a usable size again. Most users would probably see what happened, but I think the German saying that you should always have the “DAU” (dumbest user imaginable) in mind is applicable.
    Alternatively, add a standard help text when hovering over the headers, if that’s possible.

    #15997
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Beta3 is up. In addition to some bug-fixes:

    • Added “editor bar” element to the toolbar properties dialog. A toolbar that has this element included will show a row of buttons with the names of all compatible editors. Clicking an editor button will switch to that editor. The default setup has been modified to include the following editors: “Tracks”, “Editor”, “Mixer”, “Big Transport”. Use the “load default setup” command in the setup menu to get the new layout.

    • The Editor Profiles dialog shows editor type info in the listbox.

    • Modified the appearance of the space region “recess” type.

    The editor bar is not yet automatically updated when you edit the editor profiles. That’s what I’m going to work on next.

    The new default setup no longer has both the mixer and the embedded editor in the same profile. I concluded that very few will have displays with so high resolution that it makes sense to show both the embedded editor and the mixer in the same window. I’m interested in hearing your opinion on this new design.

    #15998
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Mike G wrote:

    Simple (I assume) idea to increase discoverability of podiums extensive customisation..
    On right click menus for screen obects, include “Editor Profile Properties” shortcut.
    E.g. Current items on timeline right click menu:


    -Set cursor
    -Set cursor as selection start
    -Set cursor as selection end

    -Link edit cursor to play cursor
    —-
    -Zoom full range
    —-
    -Editor Profile Properties <---new!

    There are shortcuts for opening region properties dialogs in the tracks, mixer and piano roll context menus. I’ve thought about adding more of these for the other regions, but I’m now considering moving all these into the editor View menu instead. There is already a command there for opening the profile properties dialog, but I could add a new “customize regions” submenu with shortcuts for opening the dialogs for the individual regions. Is it not better to have all the commands for customizing the editor gathered in the view menu instead of being spread in all the context menus?

    About “editor profiles”: My intent with using the word “profile” was originally to try to separate the setup of the editor from the actual editor. Editor in this case being a window or the embedded editor. You can have several profiles that you can switch between in one editor. I’m now thinking about skipping the use of the word “profile” altogether. It’s a bit much to refer to the “editor profile properties dialog”. Anyone think reducing “editor profile” to “editor” is a good/bad idea?

    #15999
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    Phew… looks like 2.20 is going to bring some pretty big changes again… 🙂

    Zooming issues in the editor are fixed, as far as I can tell!

    The new profile buttons… I think they need some more thought, and maybe user input (hint, hint… to everyone reading :wink:).
    You have to agree it’s not very ergonomic to open the editor/mixer by clicking on a button in the top right corner, move the mouse 3/4 across the screen to perform edits, and back again to close it. It’s quicker with F6/F7*, sure, but over time I’ve read from many users on this forum that they prefer not to use keyboard shortcuts. Having the buttons up there unnecessarily makes the user work more.

    If you definitely want to go in this direction then I really think how Logic handles this is the way to go, like Markus (I think!?) said in the other thread.
    That means: get rid of the different profiles for the embedded editor and the mixer and consolidate them into an “all-containing box” profile instead. Put the new page-switching buttons on a header or footer bar belonging to this profile.

    * Speaking of, what about the hide/show function on the F keys – it will become kind of deprecated now, I think. Since why would you minimize the editor/mixer when you can just jump over to the new ‘tracks’ page and back? Maybe change it so they open the ‘editor’ or ‘mixer’ page and press again to close it, returning to the ‘tracks’ page.

    P.S.: I see the profiles for ‘split timeline’ and ‘split mixer’ are not present in beta 3 anymore – I’m sure they’ll come back, right?

    #16000
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    About “editor profiles”: My intent with using the word “profile” was originally to try to separate the setup of the editor from the actual editor. Editor in this case being a window or the embedded editor. You can have several profiles that you can switch between in one editor. I’m now thinking about skipping the use of the word “profile” altogether. It’s a bit much to refer to the “editor profile properties dialog”. Anyone think reducing “editor profile” to “editor” is a good/bad idea?

    Probably less confusing to new or occasional users, but it might take away from the notion that you can have many different profiles/setups for each editor/region. Can’t decide on good or bad right now…

    #16001
    LiquidProj3ct
    Participant

    I don’t know how of useful will be those buttons, maybe they’re for people that uses more of two profiles. I’ll use them while I have to alternate between profiles with F8.

    Anyone think reducing “editor profile” to “editor” is a good/bad idea?

    I think it’s a bad idea, because there is too many editors in Podium, and it could confuse. If you want supress the word profile try something as “interface editor”, “objetcs editor”…etc 😉



    I was looking at the future plan and I see this.

    User configuration of key and mouse shortcuts.

    And take a look to my Podium configuration:

    I work with the left hand in the keyboard left half, so I was thinking that for me would be more useful have tab key [instead F8] for rotate between profiles.

    Will this feature of the future plan allow to customize all the keys and mouse buttons? (I want them mainly for Tab key, and for right click in piano roll that do two actions)

    #16002
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    I work with the left hand in the keyboard left half, so I was thinking that for me would be more useful have tab key [instead F8] for rotate between profiles.

    Will this feature of the future plan allow to customize all the keys and mouse buttons? (I want them mainly for Tab key, and for right click in piano roll that do two actions)

    Probably not all keys. But the use of the Tab key will most likely be customizable.

    #16003
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    You have to agree it’s not very ergonomic to open the editor/mixer by clicking on a button in the top right corner, move the mouse 3/4 across the screen to perform edits, and back again to close it. It’s quicker with F6/F7*, sure, but over time I’ve read from many users on this forum that they prefer not to use keyboard shortcuts. Having the buttons up there unnecessarily makes the user work more.

    If you definitely want to go in this direction then I really think how Logic handles this is the way to go, like Markus (I think!?) said in the other thread.
    That means: get rid of the different profiles for the embedded editor and the mixer and consolidate them into an “all-containing box” profile instead. Put the new page-switching buttons on a header or footer bar belonging to this profile.

    Is the problem only the location of the new editor bar? If so, you can just add a new toolbar above the transport troolbar, and move the editor bar there. I did not do that in the default setup, because I think it takes up too much space. But it would make it more similar to Logic Audio.

    P.S.: I see the profiles for ‘split timeline’ and ‘split mixer’ are not present in beta 3 anymore – I’m sure they’ll come back, right?

    No, I did not plan to put them back in. Why do you want them? The only difference to the new Tracks/Mixer profiles is that you don’t have the dual mixer and the transport and edit toolbar are not merged into one toolbar.

    #16004
    Markus
    Participant

    Yep.. Pianoroll, Mixer, editor and so on buttons would be _super_ nice.

    Also couple note editing tools would be very very welcome. Once you try these features, you cant live without them..

    http://koti.mbnet.fi/chortaj/line.avi

    http://koti.mbnet.fi/chortaj/tools.avi

    #16010
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Is the problem only the location of the new editor bar? If so, you can just add a new toolbar above the transport troolbar, and move the editor bar there. I did not do that in the default setup, because I think it takes up too much space. But it would make it more similar to Logic Audio.

    I tried that, too, but then I thought why have two bars taking up space when it could be just one.

    Now:

    Idea (don’t mind the blue lining like in the inspector too much :wink:):

    And when you click on the selected ‘tab’ again it gets minimized.

    Just an idea! Sorry for posting fantasy pictures all the time! O:)

    By the way, are we going to be able to choose which profiles appear in the toolbar?

    @Zynewave wrote:

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    P.S.: I see the profiles for ‘split timeline’ and ‘split mixer’ are not present in beta 3 anymore – I’m sure they’ll come back, right?

    No, I did not plan to put them back in. Why do you want them? The only difference to the new Tracks/Mixer profiles is that you don’t have the dual mixer and the transport and edit toolbar are not merged into one toolbar.

    I don’t need them, but I think they may have given people with two or more monitors a starting point to see how to configure Podium to work with their setup.

    #16017
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Beta4 is up, with extensions to the new editor bar. I think I’m done working on this feature, unless you have further suggestions.

    I’ve uploaded a video on YouTube that demonstrates the new 2.20 features:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv39dX7NP_Q


    @thcilnnahoj
    : I hope you don’t mind I used your demo project as background for the demo 🙂

    #16019
    thcilnnahoj
    Participant

    Well, there have been many, many suggestions… minor and major. But we know you can’t do everything! 😉
    I’m already very grateful for the new non-time-locked editors. 8)

    But… let me be completely honest and say that if you stop here and call it finished, then I think the old setup with both the editor and mixer in the same profile is actually better. Nobody says you have to open them both at the same time.
    With the old setup I can quickly close one and open the other with just two keystrokes. Not only would I lose that ability, but also I would now have two or more totally separate profiles, which likely means more maintenance. The new toolbar plus the editor/mixer header also takes up a little more space than both the editor’s and mixer’s minimized headers but actually provides less functionality. On top of that, the F6/F7 keys just become impractical to use with this setup, in my opinion. I don’t know how you intended this to work, but if it was me, I’d switch to the ‘editor’ profile if I needed the piano roll and switch back to ‘tracks’ when I’m done and want more space for the arrangement. I would not stay on the editor page and hide the editor, with F6 or otherwise.
    Of course I can always keep my old setup, but I’d like to go with the times, and also I’m concerned about an easy-to-use workspace for new users that don’t know about the extensive customization abilities of Podium. It seems not near as well thought-out as it could be… I hope you don’t take it the wrong way.

    Sure you can use the demo track! Demonstration is what it was made for, after all! 😆 Although you might’ve wanted to bounce some tracks as to not get CPU overloads.
    I see that you use a higher resolution now, it’s strange that it doesn’t fill the YouTube window, however. Is it not 16:9? Ehh, also something very, very minor: You might want to check your YouTube user picture, as it is a victim of bad resizing done by YouTube. It says max. 88×88 px, I think, but with the new channel layout it’s actually only ever used at 60×60!

    #16021
    LiquidProj3ct
    Participant

    This bug is there yet:

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Hey Frits, this is a bug (I think it’s a bug) present in olders Podium version also, but I didn’t know how replicate it, now I do know. The bug is that sometimes you cannot delete selected clip in arrangement view with SUPR key (DELETE).

    Create any clip in any track, and edit it (add notes/audio/…). Then rotate between profiles with F8 until you reach again the original profile. now try to erase the clip with DELETE/SUPR key, you cannot.

    Thanks for the update!

    #16023
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Beta4 is up, with extensions to the new editor bar. I think I’m done working on this feature, unless you have further suggestions.

    Note really a suggestion as such but a question. Will this bar be visible by default?

    I’ve uploaded a video on YouTube that demonstrates the new 2.20 features:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv39dX7NP_Q

    The demo showcases one of the best new features in Podium for years IMO. Something that simplifies the previously somewhat complex “Editor Profile Properties” The Editor Bar is a far more simplified way to tap into that power. Brilliant. :mrgreen: =D> I noticed you had two listings for Toolbars around 2:10 into the video why is that?

    #16024
    kyran
    Participant

    I disagree with thcilnnahoj.

    I think the new way of handling editor profiles is a very good improvement: it makes them much more discoverable for new users, and the configuration menu is now in a very sensible space.

    Great work 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 131 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© 2021 Zynewave