bacon's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • in reply to: Free Arturia Minimoog V #21929
    bacon
    Participant

    Cool! I always wanted a Minimoog, and there it is! Not having all the extra stuff doesn’t bother me very much – this will be great for those classic bass and lead sounds.

    in reply to: Fantastic Results #21504
    bacon
    Participant

    @The Telenator wrote:

    What are your views on the super-hot levels that seem to be the vogue? It seems like everybody is going to -.001 dB and compressing everything to smithereens. I don’t like a lot of the latest commercial mixes I’m hearing these days.

    I think it’s horrible. No dynamics, just a constant din. I hate it when I listen to otherwise good productions where obviously talented people have been involved all the way, from songwriters to singers and instrumentalists to mixing engineers and producers, just to have the recordings rendered absolutely lifeless at the mastering stage.

    in reply to: "Electro-step" song near finished. Final feedback #20716
    bacon
    Participant

    @CymaticCreation wrote:

    what should I do to finish off this track?

    The so called “Mastering” is nothing but the artificial establishment of the alleged “industry”, and therefore it applies only to those, whose goals are commercial and profit driven.
    And this has nothing to do with objective quality ( the loudness wars for an example ) and art in general. Quite the contrary. [-X

    That sums it up nicely.

    In the days of vinyl records you needed a bit of mastering so as not to exceed the limited dynamic range of an LP. In the days of digitally recorded music, mastering only serves the purpose of processing away most of the dynamics so that a song will sound as loud as possible on the radio, sucking the life out of the music in the process.

    The recording sounds finished to me. You have talent and a good ear. That’s all you need.

    in reply to: Technology preview: Podium running on iOS & Android #20092
    bacon
    Participant

    I’ll just chime in with my support for an Android version of Podium. I’ll get a new phone from work in February and I can choose between an iPhone and an Android (several different makes/models to choose from). I’m leaning towards the Android because of its more open nature, and a Pdoium version for the platform would seal the deal for me.

    P.S.
    My first computer MIDI sequencer was also Steinberg Pro-16 on the C64 (Pro-24 was for the Atari ST). Good times 🙂

    in reply to: Still new and still learning I suppose- #19693
    bacon
    Participant

    @German Fafian wrote:

    @Infinitoar wrote:

    Meh oh well. I’m still going to use it. Maybe I’ll start reading some coding books of my own and hopefully one day if I have the inspiration to do it make my own updates :P[Or gets my friends to see what they can do since they are programmers themselves, who knows 😛 ]

    Hmmmm!

    The code in Podium is intelectual property and not open sourced and doing any changes or adding to it without Fritz permission is illegal.

    Just pointing out 😉

    Well, not really illegal if he only changes it for his own use. But that point is moot, since to be able to make any changes to the program he’d have to have access to the source code, which I doubt Frits will supply him with.

    No matter how good a programmer you are, you won’t be able to add any features to a program when you only have access to the binary executable.

    in reply to: effect level automation #19639
    bacon
    Participant

    Have you inserted the reverb in the track itself? Reverb is ususally better to have as a bus effect. Add a send to the instrument/audio track and put the reverb on the bus that’s connected to the send. You can then automate the send level to get the result you’re after.

    in reply to: Audio folders #19593
    bacon
    Participant

    For some reason I managed to post this in another thread instead of here. Now I post it here where it belongs:
    The open source sound editor Audacity can do timestretch (they call it “Change Tempo”) and many other things, like noise removal, compression, etc.

    in reply to: Problems with ASIO #19592
    bacon
    Participant

    I have no idea how my reply ended up here. I meant to post in this thread. 😳

    in reply to: Problems with ASIO #19586
    bacon
    Participant

    The open source sound editor Audacity can do timestretch (they call it “Change Tempo”) and many other things, like noise removal, compression, etc.

    in reply to: Podium and multiout vsti #19542
    bacon
    Participant

    @michi_mak wrote:

    @bacon : thanx for the instance explanation !!

    np 🙂

    good hint with the additional track but it still does not work 100% the way i want to – while there is only one sequence used for triggering all the outputs i still can’t solo any of the tracks feeding the outputs … the track containing the sequence gets disabled too …

    You need to solo both the separate output track and the MIDI track at the same time. I haven’t found a workaround to this. Still, it’s only a matter of pressing two solo buttons instead of one.

    in reply to: Podium and multiout vsti #19540
    bacon
    Participant

    Create a separate track with the device set to MIDI IN on the same instance of the VSTi, i.e., don’t put MIDI data on any of the separate out tracks.

    Assume you have only one instance of SomeSynth running. This instance will show up as “SomeSynth #1” in the devices list. Now assume that you have four separate outputs from this instance assigned to tracks 1-4. You should then create a new track which uses the device “SomeSynth #1 MIDI IN 1”, and put all MIDI data on this track.

    EDIT: Oh, and the thing about instances. If VST instruments were hardware instruments, an instance would be one hardware instrument. Every time you put SomeSynth on a track, an instance is created. This would be the real world equivalent of pulling out a hardware synth and connecting it to the mixer in a studio. If you put SomeSynth on another track, this becomes a new instance – the equivalent of pulling out yet another, identical, hardware synth and connecting it to the mixer.

    in reply to: Podium 2.37: audio dropuots and crashes #19493
    bacon
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    On some laptops I know that Wi-Fi or network adapter cards can cause spikes. Try disabling these.

    That did the trick.

    How on earth can the Wi-Fi drivers be so badly written as to take over the whole system for a fraction of a second? Or is it a problem inherent to Windows and/or the hardware?

    @bacon wrote:

    When I go into Options, change the soundcard settings, and click Apply, Podium crashes.

    It have this on my todo list. I believe you can avoid the crash if you switch off the power button in the arrangement editor, before you change the sound driver in the interfaces dialog.

    I haven’t had time to try this yet but I’ll report back as soon as I have.

    in reply to: Crash when automating two VST parameters in Podium 2.33 #19267
    bacon
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Which Podium version number, and which VAZ Plus version number?

    Podium 2.33, as it says in the subject line, with the latest stable version of VAZ Plus (2.02).

    I’ve previously experienced stability issues with VAZ Modular, so perhaps VAZ Plus has the same issues.

    Have you been in contact with Martin Fay (the VAZ developer) about these problems? It would be in both his and your interest to fix this, right?

    Try to replace your VAZ Plus with another instrument on the track, and repeat the automation procedure you used to make VAZ Plus crash.

    OK, I’ll try it and see what happens.

    EDIT: There’s a discussion about this problem on the VAZ support forum.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
© 2021 Zynewave