Osofaux's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • in reply to: About midi in #4306
    Osofaux
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    dont u think that the midi in port mapping sould be applied automaticaly to the selected track?

    There is already an item on the plan concerning global MIDI input mappings.

    Just thought I’d express an interest in this feature, too. I’ll do a Snoopy dance when this is added. 🙂

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4305
    Osofaux
    Participant

    I’m gonna go make some music or something. 8)

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4303
    Osofaux
    Participant

    Thanks! 🙂

    I guess I’ll go ahead and spill the rest of the ideas I had in this area, bringing it back round to the ‘hardware editor’ thing, and then I’ll shut up. 😉

    Basically, in the realm of MIDI sysex Library Presets, I imagine you’d only have a few common types besides regular bulk dumps. The terms vary from synth to synth, but whatever they’re called, they would look something like Patches, Performances, Rhythm Kits, System, and then Generic/Bulk. So if you had a MIDI sysex Library Preset, and could assign this Preset type with a radio button, with two further checkboxes that looked something like:

    [x]Data begins at byte [8] from any occurance of F0
    [x]Checksum byte precedes any occurance of F7

    …then you could account for most of the data types that would commonly occur, along with checksums and segmented messages. Assuming this was in place, then two further options in the properties of a Parameter object, like so:

    [x]Synchronize with Byte [42] in MIDI Sysex Library Preset Type [Patch]
    [x]Display Parameter in Instrument/Library Preset Editor

    …would enable the Parameter objects read the values as they are transmitted to the synth when selecting a library preset, since the location of said values would be very consistent as long as Podium knows the Preset type. So you could then have that cool ‘E’ button pop up when you have select a Library preset that is not Generic/Bulk, which could then revise the Library preset at the same time Parameter values are being sent to the synth.

    This would allow the user to make quick editor panels for common synth parameters, for tweaking pre-existing Library presets, updating any bytes that are changed and leaving the rest intact.

    Okay, I’ll shut up now. 😀

    in reply to: Writing MIDI program changes #4302
    Osofaux
    Participant

    That is so slick, I can hardly contain myself. 😀

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4300
    Osofaux
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    In the meantime, as far as sysex parameter objects go, perhaps a [checksum] variable in the macro language would help on the synths that require them? I’m assuming I can’t use these with the Roland as it is now, but I’ll experiment a little more just to make sure.

    I’ve never encountered checksums in small parameter change SysEx messages. Does the Roland really use checksum for these as well? Do you have a link for downloading Roland SysEx docs?

    Just tried it out using this sysex string :

    F0 41 10 6A 12 02 00 00 00 [value] 5E F7

    The [02 00 00 00] is the address for the first character in the name of the patch in the first part of the performance on the JV. The ‘5E’ is the checksum byte. If I take that byte out, the JV does nothing but display the following message :

    “System Exclusive Message : Check Sum Error”

    If I leave it in, it displays the same message, but changes the first character in the display when changing the parameter in the mixer. So it appears to need that checksum, even if it’s the wrong one. ❓

    Here’s a little light reading on Roland sysex stuff that I found :

    http://www.borg.com/~jglatt/tutr/rolsysx.htm

    In any case, my simple test appears to work, even if it gives the error.

    Phew, I’m learning a lot here. 😯

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4298
    Osofaux
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Thanks for the suggestions Brian.

    I’ve had similar ideas, although I have put those on ice since I started going the route of VST plugin support. It’s all logical suggestions, but it requires a lot of coding. There are dedicated applications for this purpose like SoundDiver and MidiQuest, that cost 2-3 times the price of Podium.

    I’ve made a simple macro language for SysEx parameters. Doing something similar with SysEx presets, with all the pitfalls you mention, is a bit more complex. Maybe I’ll look at it sometime in the future if the Podium userbase that uses hardware synths grows considerably.

    Thanks for keeping these in mind for the future. While detailed synth editing might be best left to a dedicated application, some librarian features are definitely nice to have in a sequencer.

    I’ve found what looks like a pretty decent editor for JV/XP (and even XV) synths called Changeit. It’s freeware to boot. So I’ll probably be working with that.

    In the meantime, as far as sysex parameter objects go, perhaps a [checksum] variable in the macro language would help on the synths that require them? I’m assuming I can’t use these with the Roland as it is now, but I’ll experiment a little more just to make sure.

    Thanks again…

    Brian

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4295
    Osofaux
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    If I understand you correctly, then this is already possible. Check out the ‘Collecting Hardware Device Library Presets’ section in the guide. If you have a bunch of .syx files with presets, then you can also import those directly, in which case Podium will create SysEx library presets for them. You have to import them under the proper device definition object though.

    That’s it exactly! I guess I should have RTFM on that one. 😳

    I have a Nord Lead 2X and a Roland JV-2080 (both of which I’m about to complete device definitions for and send your way, if you’d like to add them to the library)… So I’ve played around with this feature and thought I’d share what I’ve found.

    Starting with the Nord, since it’s a bit more simple… The Nord is 4 part multi-timbral. When you send patch data from the temporary edit buffer, it still sends the patch slot ($00-$03, for parts A-D) as the sixth byte in the message. In hex:

    F0
    33 – Manufacturer ID
    0F – Device ID
    04 – Model ID
    00 – Specifies the Bank, 00 = Edit Buffer
    00 – Patch Slot, if a specific memory location is not specified ..
    F7

    So if you’ve made your library while selecting patches in slot A and you’re looking for a library preset to go with a sequence you’ve got playing on slot D, you will hear no difference there from sending out these patches since they will have been sent right back to A.

    It’s the same with the JV-2080, except in that case there are 16 temporary edit buffers in its multi-timbral Performance mode, one for each part. Trouble here is that a patch sent to and from the JV doesn’t go to ANY of those buffers, but to the edit buffer for the mono-timbral Patch mode. There is no other way to manually send a single patch from this device.

    If there were some way that Podium could be told (perhaps in the Device Mapping) what byte(s) in a system exclusive Library Preset object corresponded to the Part or Slot on a synth, then perhaps that data could be changed dynamically to match the channel of the device mapping on the current track.

    Of course, nothing is ever really that simple, I know… considering:

    1) Patches are not the only things that could be sent out from a system exclusive library preset.
    2) Roland JV-2080 presets appear to be broken into multiple messages… and
    3) Messages for Roland devices would have to have their checksums recalculated if they are changed, if I’m not mistaken.

    I understand that trying to make anything work with this synth or that’s system exclusive messages is not for the faint of heart, so I’m not writing expecting miracles or anything – Just thought I’d give you some feedback should you decide to take Podium further in this direction.

    Regards
    Brian

    in reply to: Edit button for hardware synths #4293
    Osofaux
    Participant

    Hi Frits,

    Thanks for the quick reply. I definitely see how the lack of sync between editor panel and patch selection would give the impression of something broken or half-implemented. Sysex is very powerful, but it can get complex very quickly…

    I think if there were access to an organized collection of parameter settings, even if it were entirely one-way and even if it weren’t necessarily accessable from the main arrangement screen, it would still have some use to users who do want to do patch creation or editing without having to fiddle with the buttons on their synths. (until they have to hit the save button, that is.)

    I suppose that this does tie in with another idea I had for sysex. In a preset object, an option for “Sysex Transmit” under the “Program selection” radio buttons and a field for pasting and editing said message would allow for transmission of patch sysex into the temporary edit buffers of some synths – Basically a way of allowing “library” presets for hardware. (The actual creation of the sysex file or string would be left up to another program like MIDI-OX or something.)

    Now if there was someway to syncronize these presets with an editor panel, that would be absolutely killer. 🙂

    Of course, I know this is all pretty ambitious, but when I play with Podium I can’t help but get ideas and share them. Thanks again…

    Regards
    Brian

    in reply to: Request For Channel EQ’s! #4068
    Osofaux
    Participant

    Please pardon if this is a dumb question, but will there be something similar for MIDI tracks?

    in reply to: Request For Channel EQ’s! #4065
    Osofaux
    Participant

    That’s an excellent solution, Frits. Add my vote to Alphonse’s.

    in reply to: General praise! and a question #4058
    Osofaux
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    ooi, what’s the count on registered users?

    25-30. Still a long way to go before Steinberg will feel threatened 😉

    I’ve seen the forums at cubase.net, and communication does not seem to be Steinberg’s strong point. Podium users are blessed in this area. It also seems that Steiny users get “flashy new stuff” with updates that should have been more real bug fixes. Again, we’re lucky.

    Maybe we’re a small group, but I think we could consider ourselves elite. 😀

    in reply to: A few ideas/suggestions #3988
    Osofaux
    Participant

    Hi again Frits (sorry I spelled it wrong the first time!)

    Thanks for the quick response. My apologies if some of these ideas seem a bit strange, I’m still learning my way around and finding different ways to do things.

    MIDI IN/OUT monitor shows MIDI message types and values

    What are you referring to as MIDI monitor?

    Ah, I see I got the terminology wrong. 😳 The MIDI indicator. 🙂 I noticed there was some space in the lower right of the arrangement screen that is not used. I remember this coming in handy a few times in Logic Audio, as the transport in that displayed MIDI data coming in and being echoed out.

    Changes to tempo can be heard in realtime

    If you change tempo events during playback, the playback tempo changes. What do you mean with realtime?

    I noticed that the changes in the Tempo Event Properties window are not applied until the “OK” button is pressed. I thought it might be nice to hear the changes as the values are being edited.

    Realtime nondestructive quantize on MIDI tracks
    Realtime nondestructive transpose on MIDI tracks

    Sounds like a job for a simple MIDI plugin. Support for MIDI plugins is on the plan.

    Count-In for playback/recording

    On the plan.

    Event list can be made to show only events for individual tracks/event types
    Event list can be edited similar to text file

    The event list could do with some improvements. I haven’t touched it for a long time. I’ll add it to the plan.

    Great! 🙂

    Zoom keeps current position centered

    I assume you mean when using the zoombar sliders at the lower right of the editor windows? When I want to zoom in on a particular point, I use the zoom tool shortcuts (Shift+Ctrl+Alt combinations), click at the point I want to lock on the screen, and drag.

    Say, that works pretty well. Thank you.

    .POD files may be expanded in list window to display objects

    That will not be an easy thing to implement. There are many links between the objects in a project, so the whole project file needs to be loaded to be able to safely extract individual objects. If you want to extract objects from a project and insert it in another project, I recommend you load the project, copy your desired objects to the clipboard, load your new project, and paste.

    I had this idea that it would be cool to have a single .POD file for the growing list of supported hardware that could be browsed and partially imported. Definitely no biggie.

    “Create Multiple…” wizard under “New” drop down menu

    What scenarios would you want to create multiple objects for in one go? Copy/paste can get you far.

    I have a JV-2080 and a Nord Lead 2X and was thinking that something like this might be a way to create banks of presets very quickly. Like a wizard that make a batch of 128 presets in order, with a common bank select. Either this, or be able to select multiple presets and edit a common parameter for all of them, in this case, bank controller values.

    Aliases may be created for device maps

    What do you mean with ‘alias’? Why would you like to create aliases for mapping objects?

    I think I like to over-compartmentalize things a bit… Once I realized that you could make pretty much as many device mappings in as many folders as you want to, I set out to make one folder of VST plugs with folders for each developer, then another with folders for each plug type (reverb, chorus, etc.) Is there a way to do this so that multiple mappings to the same VST plug will share the same preset library?

    Thanks very much,
    Brian

    in reply to: Support for Non-GUI VST plug-ins #3984
    Osofaux
    Participant

    Hey guys, thanks for the replies, and thank you for bumping that up on your to-do list. In the meantime, I’ll try to wrap these VST’s in Energy XT as a work-around.

    I’m building my studio in Podium this morning (without the wizard, aren’t I brave? 😀 ) and find myself thinking of little things here and there to make it easier, so I’ll probably be writing another post this afternoon with a few suggestions.

    Thanks again
    -Brian

Viewing 13 posts - 16 through 28 (of 28 total)
© 2021 Zynewave