Zynewave's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 5,969 total)
  • in reply to: Option to "clear" .wav tracks #14954
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    There is no way to clear all sounds in one command, but a quick way to clear each individual sound is to open the sound properties dialog and enter 0 in the length.

    in reply to: Saving arrangements #14949
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Conquistador wrote:

    It appears to be a Project Properties name that is not changed after the Save Project As… command is used.

    Correct. The name entered in the project properties dialog is not linked to the file name. That also applies to the name entered in the sound properties dialog. My original thought behind this was that it would make it possible to enter a more specific name for the object, also allowing the use of chars that are illegal in filenames. The option to ignore the object name and just always use the filename has been requested before by acousmod, and it is a FR that is creeping up on my todo list. Improved file management is also on the list, but right now all my attention is on the new automation system.

    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    How can I get the Source option to come up again with my track so I can add an instrument? Note I can insert fx, just not instruments.

    The source submenu is only available on the track at the bottom of the chain. It could be that the track on which you open the menu is a parent effect track.

    If you still have problems, please email your .pod project file (no need to attach audio files) to info at zynewave.com (email is also listed on the home page).

    in reply to: Track Templates For MIDI Tracks? #14947
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Sure you can. Just select the track you have set up, and use the “save track as template” command. Leave the “copy track timeline events…” option off. Then use the “new track” submenu in the track templates menu when you want to create a new track based on the template.

    in reply to: Took me long enough… #14945
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Conquistador wrote:

    …but I just saw the new Emoticons that were added, nice. :D/

    Yes, it’s been 3 full days since I added them. Please pay attention [-X

    😉

    Oh, and congrats on your new avatar =D>

    in reply to: Weird piano roll editing behavior? #14943
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Alt+clicking a ghost note is a shortcut for switching the editor to the sequence where the ghost note belongs. If you don’t press the alt key, then you should be able to add new notes whether you click on empty space or click on ghost notes.

    in reply to: 2.14 #14942
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @kyran wrote:

    I like the new ctrl key behaviour, but the alt key still behaves in the old way. Is there a reason why this behaviour is not possible for the alt key?

    If you refer to the ctrl key change mentioned in the VIP topic then it is not included in this release. It will appear in 2.15.

    in reply to: Automation problem #14922
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @pernst wrote:

    At the risk of scope creep, any chance of multiple lanes per parameter to facilitate “takes” for automation?

    :-k Hmm. Fair enough to get all automation ideas on the table while I’m already revising the system.

    I guess I could add the “use as composite track” option for parameter tracks as well. That should make it possible to manually compose a parameter track using take lanes, just like the current composite track feature. To make it automatically create new takes on recording requires a bit more work.

    Can you describe a situation where you would use multi-take parameter tracks?

    Out of curiosity: Are there any other hosts which support a multi-take feature for automation?

    in reply to: Automation problem #14911
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    I’m currently doing some experimentation with a new automation system. Unless I encounter difficulties, there is a good chance that it will be ready for the next release. It’s a big job though, but I think I finally have figured out the best way to do it.

    in reply to: Imported MIDI. No Master track, but need one? #14910
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    The master track should be created automatically if any of the instruments mapped to the midi tracks use audio. So if your instruments are VSTi plugins then the master should be created.

    There isn’t an easy way to add a master track to an arrangement that has been created as a no-audio arrangement. Make sure that your project has a complete device setup, before you import the midi file.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: 2.14 #14896
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Small visual bug, when sequences are short and you have them in a far zoom:

    Look at those small rectangles in the top of each phantom sequence

    Fixed. Thanks.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: 2.14 #14886
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    • Fix: Minimizing/restoring the Podium application could reopen windows that were previously closed. This happened only on XP and was caused by a change in 2.13.

    Curious! I experienced this with 2.13 and at least with 2.14 beta 3 too. I am, however, using Vista!

    Ok, I removed the XP/Vista bit from the release note. It didn’t happen on my Vista machine, so I assumed it was ok on Vista.

    in reply to: Panning and indivual track. #14883
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @dea wrote:

    You know, I must confess…. I did not keep track of the exact steps. But, things were not consistant at all. Sometimes it worked. Sometimes it did not. Same VST fxs. Now, things are good and panning is working fine.

    I don’t quite understand the concept of having the child program change track’s option to display output panning and gain vs. the top level parent track’s option to display output panning and gain?

    How is one different than the other?

    I’m not sure I understand what you mean with having pan on a “child program change track”. It doesn’t sound right to me. Can you email your project file or perhaps post a screenshot?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 5,969 total)