@michi_mak wrote:
so what happened to the list with 50+ request you had bookmarked?
I haven’t lost it, if that’s what you’re thinking.
@Lion wrote:
Just out of curiosity is there any idea around how long that would take?
The GDI/Direct2D thing will take less than a week.
It is not a problem running Podium on ARM processors. I already have Podium running on ARM with the experimental iOS port I did a while back.
What is more problematic is that Microsoft is rumored to only support Metro style apps and not desktop apps, with Windows 8 on ARM based tablets. The new Metro API is called WinRT, which replaces the old Win32 API. With WinRT, Microsoft has understandably chosen to cut out some of the older redundant technology. For example, the Win32 GDI graphics system that Podium uses, is replaced by Direct2D in WinRT. So, I’ll need to implement support for Direct2D in Podium. There are other problem areas, such as with the audio and MIDI support in WinRT, but I’ll just have to deal with them one at a time.
@Infinitoar wrote:
Zynewave I don’t know now as I’m typing this, but how do you enable the latency info in the mixer? I will toy around with Podium to check that out, but off the top off my head I don’t know how…
Click the “mixer options menu” button at the top left corner of the mixer.
If you enable the “show latency information” option in the mixer, you can verify what your latency is in samples and milliseconds. An ASIO buffer size of 2048 will give a fairly noticeable delay when monitoring direct. It’s also possible that some plugins (typically compressors) add additional latency. If your PC can’t handle lower buffer sizes with ASIO4ALL, then you may get better performance with a dedicated soundcard that has a native ASIO driver.
You could also split the sound event where you want to boost, set up a crossfade by resizing the events so they overlap, and then raise the gain of the new sound event.
I have no intention of letting Podium die. I realize it’s been a while since the last release, but I’ve been busy with another job. I have to do other work to make a living.
I’ve also spent some time with the Windows 8 developer preview, to examine what is needed to make Podium run on that platform. The world is moving fast towards touch-based input on tablet-size form factors, and I want to ensure that Podium will run on those systems as well. That will require a series of updates that I’m preparing, such as an updated project file storage method, and updates to the graphics and audio layer I’m using in Podium. Those updates will take some time and unfortunately does not provide new features, but I find it important that Podium will be able to support all Windows 8 platforms (Intel/Arm) from the day Windows 8 launches.
As far as I can remember, ReWire cannot handle offline (faster than realtime) bounce. Try using realtime bounce recording.
Not yet. I expect to have it fixed for the next release.
You can email your .pod project file to me (info at zynewave.com), and I’ll see if your setup is ok.
Both meters are moving on the tracks and the master
From your description, I take it that your recorded audio files actually contain wave data in both channels (i.e. are there two channels displayed in the waveform display).
If so, then it likely is a problem with the audio output mapping selected on the master track. On project creation, Podium will create both stereo and mono mappings for all the channels you’ve enabled on your audio interface. Open the properties for the main output mapping, and check that the “mixer output” combobox is showing “stereo”.
Only the values of the actual point events are saved in MIDI files. If you use line or spline point automation, you’ll need to convert those to bar points. You can use the “transform to grid aligned points” command (uses the editor grid value), and then “convert to bar points”.
@VanGogh wrote:
One Question I have, on one single Track I can “load” only 1 Midi channel of 16 at once?
Yes.
@VanGogh wrote:
Hi,
so far I’m trying the demo. Is there a possibelity to labeling the event
entries? Appropiate Keys ( enharmonic) flat and sharp is probably difficult to implement?BTW: Cool Software…soon I will buy a licence
VanGogh
Hi,
Your screenshot shows that you’ve found that you can enter labels for the keys on the keyboard through the “Customize Note Map” menu. If you hover the mouse over an event, the label on the keyboard will be highlighted. You can also color code specific key lanes, so that it is easy to associate note events placed on special purpose keys (e.g. keyswitches in samplers). Another option is to select a scale in a tempo event, which will cause the lanes for notes in the scale to be highlighted.
The actual events can’t be labeled. I think it will be too messy to write text on all events.