alex's Forum Page « Zynewave

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 131 total)

← 1 2 3 4 … 7 8 9 →

January 29, 2013 at 13:52 in reply to: FRITS, WE NEED YOUR INPUT! #22784

alex
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

The current thing I’m working on is a revision of the plugin loading system..

@alex wrote:

– Plugin scan – adding new and removing deleted plugins (from the list) at every launch.

Would it be a problem to take care of this when you’re already at it? 😉

Cheers, Alex

January 28, 2013 at 17:05 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22777

alex
Participant

Mono to stereo plugin that acts as mono to mono is one of the problems and let’s leave it alone for now (I just wanted to know why is that so).

Main problem:

Mono to mono plugin in return section – meter should be showing two bars (for both channels) or maybe not, it’s not important what it shows after all, as long as pan is enabled (and it should be enabled, don’t matter if it’s pre, post fader or whatever).

mono track, post everything>mono return (mono to mono fx) post everything – pan return

or optionally, both or one of the channels pre fader/post fx – it should work in every scenario.

January 28, 2013 at 10:13 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22775

alex
Participant

Does anybody else have these problems?

Thanks

January 26, 2013 at 16:50 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22770

alex
Participant

When I choose a mono to mono or a mono to stereo plugin and touch nothing else, the meter is showing a single bar and the pan knob is grayed out.

January 26, 2013 at 15:51 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22768

alex
Participant

Thanks for your answer!

Just create a return for a mono track, pick any mono to mono plugin (reverb is what we’re talking about, but it’s the same with all mono to mono plugins), send some signal and you’ll see what happens.

Same goes for mono to stereo plugins – I don’t need to pan that, but Podium “sees” them as mono to mono (only in return section) 😕

Cheers, Alex

January 26, 2013 at 12:33 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22765

alex
Participant

BUMP

January 24, 2013 at 17:31 in reply to: Two Problems in Return Section #22757

alex
Participant

BUMP

January 20, 2013 at 16:14 in reply to: Not FRs …. #22746

alex
Participant

Tnx! Found it in some drop down menu. Why can every channel be moved easily with the right click except for the master?

January 20, 2013 at 12:24 in reply to: Help With Monitors #22743

alex
Participant

Changed my mind and took a ride to the city with a good equipped music store (didn’t want to buy anything before I try it). So, I checked M-audio BX5, KRK ROKIT 5 and YAMAHA HS50m (I had a couple of my mixes with me). M audios were out of the game immediately (but they’re the cheapest pair and not really bad or something). Actually, it was easy for me to make a choice (not because of the white cones or because I’m biased towards Yamaha speakers ). KRKs are good and this was really a matter of personal preference (they have too much bottom end somehow and that’s what I didn’t like, but maybe it’s just me – NS10’s have low frequency drop).

I’m posting just to say that I’m really happy with them, so if you’re looking for a cheap pair of monitors you maybe want to check hs50’s (recommended).

Cheers, Alex

January 15, 2013 at 13:11 in reply to: Bottom Line #22717

alex
Participant

delited

January 14, 2013 at 12:23 in reply to: I don’t know about this… #22713

alex
Participant

Update:

(not posting to back up what I said I thought about Adobe’s motives to offer their software for free)

A lot of people were worried because one of Adobe representatives posted on their forums that using the software was illegal for the people who were not licensed users. No worries – the whole thread has been deleted.

edited to add:

No one is now saying it is legal, though (and probably no one ever will, but everything is much clearer now, imo).

January 13, 2013 at 12:10 in reply to: I don’t know about this… #22709

alex
Participant

@The Telenator wrote:

Whatever their reasons and motives were at Adobe, I agree it is nice they are offering all their legacy software.

:-k

@alex wrote:

I was really pissed because the good old CEP was freeware for some time, and they made it again not to be as they bought it (it was the first app I worked with) – the first version of AA was nothing but CEP 2.1, and later when they made some improvements there was no upgrade path for licensed CEP users.

Not literary, but it seems that history repeats itself – now they’re offering an outdated version of software as freeware (saying it’s not freeware at the same time) hoping that people will get used to use it and then feel the need to get the newest version. hehe 😈

January 11, 2013 at 22:10 in reply to: I don’t know about this… #22701

alex
Participant

Well. Almost the same here. Although I really enjoyed remembering CEP days, AA3 remained unused from the day I installed it. And it would feel strange to use it knowing it ain’t really freeware.

Cheers, Alex

P.S. And you’re really right about installing new stuff. I’m only going to have REAPER and SF on my pc and of coarse I’m gonna keep Podium free and install the new version of Wavosaur on my old PC that runs XP (it will be all freeware studio with only free plugs, samples… and my online machine).

January 11, 2013 at 21:06 in reply to: One Small Request :) … #22698

alex
Participant

I just gotta chime in and say that I really enjoy reading this thread. Whole lotta interesting stuff here.

Keep up the good work!

Cheers, Alex

January 10, 2013 at 15:45 in reply to: I don’t know about this… #22693

alex
Participant

I realized I was talking about some less important AA’s features in my little off the top of my head “review” (and some problems I could remember about). So, here’s a nice (real) review:

http://www.musicradar.com/gear/tech/computers-software/audio-editors/audition-3-151070

Cheers, Alex

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 131 total)

← 1 2 3 4 … 7 8 9 →