Podianer's Forum Page

@Conquistador wrote:

@Zynewave wrote:

I’ve now got the fades working. After some tests I’m having doubts on how best to store the fade in/out durations. Currently they are locked to the arrangement timeline. Thus if you change the arrangement tempo, or time-stretch a sound event (not yet implemented), the fade in/out positions will move in relation to the actual waveform. Would it be better to have the fade in/out positions lock to the actual waveform data?

Hmmm based on your description of potential side effects or problems with the ‘locked to time line’ approach I would think having the fade in/out positions lock to the actual wave form data would be a better choice.

+1

@darcyb62 wrote:

I like it… and am anxiously waiting…

+1000 😆

@Zynewave wrote:

Is the blurred background image a screenshot of Podium?

Yes. Three screenshots.

To be honest, I’m not sure I like this better than the existing splash screen.

😥 ok.. It was just a try.. Podium is your baby! 😉

@Max wrote:

Well, I did not want to talk about this, but since acousmod mentonied it… Yeah, I kinda agree with him. New splashscreen design looks oldfashioned for me (but Podium design is not), and the icon now looks strange… Because it’s hard to recognize it in windows start menu (it has a white background by default).

I believe that icons that uses 32bit colour depth with pseudo3d effects looks more catchy for potential user’s eyes.

But of course it just my opinion.

I agree with that.. Lets start a little contest! 😆

Frits, how do you like this one??

I know it is nothing really extraordinary, but I think the colors match perfectly to the standard theme.. What do you guys think?

Thanks for the update! 😉

Really appreciate the bugfixes!

I don’t think it is fair to say I say so little about it.

+1!!

Sometimes I wonder if it would be a better solution to do like e.g. Jørgen is doing with eXT2; Stop the frequent releases and announce that something “big” is coming up, and then go undercover for a year or so.

I can assure you, that at least for me, the fact that there are frequent releases is a major reason why I love Podium! Thus we as users seem to have a direct influence on the development as feature requests are implemented. Please don’t stop to work on Podium this hard and the way you do all the time.

I think one can get a false impression about how you work. I don’t think you work this way, but maybe others do: For some people it might look the way that you are only working on specific FRs between the releases, but I can imagine, that some FRs take several releases of development in the “background”. Thus as some other features recently made their way into Podium (and I LOVE the template tracks!!!) you have certainly made your mind about future releases! For ME, the implementation of the recent workflow enhancements and usability features for newcomers are WAY MORE important than clip fades!! We all want this community to grow. It is only possible this way!! And I am ok with my current workaround for clipfades, as I automate the levels at the specific points in the timeline.

And I hope you do not understand my frequent requests as means of distraction 🙂 We users and those who request some features from time to time are only interested in the growth of Podium. How YOU, in the end, react to those requests in terms of schedule or priorities, has always been great!! So take your time! When I take a look at Tracktion and the fact that they are not able to fix the (for me) simplest bugs, I realize that working with Podium including your frequent bugfixes is like DAW heaven!! 8)

So: Don’t change anything, please!! 🙂

Max