Zynewave's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 5,969 total)
  • in reply to: Preview 2.26: Track toolbar & track categories #17367
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Malcolm Jacobson wrote:

    I would also like the ability to select multiple tracks.

    I plan to implement that soon after 2.26 is released. I am sticking to working on track management in the following releases, until I think there is not much more that can be improved.

    in reply to: Preview 2.26: Track toolbar & track categories #17366
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    1. Is there a way to add multiple tracks at once with the “+” button on the toolbar?

    Not currently. Clicking will open the track properties dialog, for naming the new track. If you need an initial number of tracks, isn’t it sufficient that you have the track setting in the “new arrangement” dialog?

    Well… for once, I would take a guess most people don’t know exactly how many tracks it’s going to be in the end. That may be a kind of user error, but it still happens. The situation I sometimes find myself in personally is drum tracks. You can’t specify things like “create 2 group tracks, one with 8, the other with 6 child tracks” in the new arrangement dialog.
    Maybe this is best done with track templates… I do however see multiple track creation as a rather basic function. Either way, that’s my opinion on it.

    Whenever I need a set of new tracks, I create one track, press Ctrl+C and then Ctrl+V for each additional track. As long as the number of required new tracks are below 10, I think this is a faster process than selecting a “Create X new tracks” menu command to show a dialog, inputting the decimal value, and pressing enter. Using copy/paste you also preserve track settings and the effect chain. But I don’t mind adding the menu as there seems to be a demand for it. What should the menu command be called, and where would you want it?

    I also forgot the most important question: How it will work across different editor profiles! I hope, since you say the categories are tied to an arrangement, that the “filter” is going to work independently.

    It’s not stored in the editor profile, so switching between editors will preserve your category selection. Since it is tied to the arrangement, it also means that if you have two editor windows open, one with the tracks and the other with a mixer, then category selection is synced in both windows.

    in reply to: Preview 2.26: Track toolbar & track categories #17364
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @UncleAge wrote:

    1. Would this “filter” also act on the mixer tracks as well?

    Yes, I think so. Perhaps there are situations where you prefer the mixer to always show all tracks, so maybe I’ll make category show/hide optional in the mixer.

    2. Would the category selections be exclusive?

    I ask because I found this to be most useful when working in the mixer section. It was handy while drawing automation in the tracks as well but after the project was compete I had used this feature most during the first part of mixing the tracks.

    I haven’t decided yet whether clicking a category button should automatically deselect other selected categories. You would then use shift+click to select a category without deselecting the others.

    What is the other DAW you refer to?

    in reply to: Preview 2.26: Track toolbar & track categories #17359
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    I still have to figure out how the category buttons should react. There are at least three functions that should be available in one button: show/hide, mute and solo. Maybe the category setup should include a setting for what the primary purpose of the category is, which will be the action that a normal click on the button will do. The other functions can then be accessed with key shortcuts, or by right-clicking the category button to show an option menu.

    Still a lot of design issues to consider :-k

    in reply to: Preview 2.26: Track toolbar & track categories #17358
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    but I’ll have to ponder some more about the balance of additional housekeeping vs. the benefits the “categorization” brings to the table. Maybe we’ll get a few ideas about disarming it – if that is necessary at all – after a beta becomes ready.

    Setting up track categories will only make sense when you work with a lot of tracks. You can ignore this feature, and it will work like previous Podium releases. If you never work with a large number of tracks, you can choose to remove the track toolbar from the editor.

    1. Is there a way to add multiple tracks at once with the “+” button on the toolbar?

    Not currently. Clicking will open the track properties dialog, for naming the new track. If you need an initial number of tracks, isn’t it sufficient that you have the track setting in the “new arrangement” dialog?

    2. How does this work with group tracks… If you select, for example, the “Bus Returns” group track to be shown, will it automatically show its child tracks? And will it update correctly if you add more child tracks (returns in this example) to it?

    If you add a group track to a category, it will automatically include all child tracks.

    3. Is it possible to have only child tracks from various groups shown, and if so, how will it affect the visual routing?

    I haven’t implemented this yet, but I think that if you include a child track in a category, then it’s parent group track should also be displayed, at least as a collapsed track (6 pixel height). That way the hierarchic structure is intact.

    [Edit] 4. (One more): Can you go still back to the a view of all tracks, categorized or not, or do you have to create an “all-encompassing” category first yourself? If it’s the latter, will it update if you add more tracks later on?

    If you deselect all categories, it will show all tracks. Otherwise a track would be completely invisible if it wasn’t included in any categories. If you add a new track while you have a category selected, the track will automatically be added to that category.

    in reply to: Podium preview topics #17355
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Loading effects into podium #17352
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    If you haven’t already gone through it, I can recommend that you read the Getting Started chapter in the guide. Here’s a link to the online wiki page:

    http://www.zynewave.com/wiki/doku.php?id=guide:getting_started

    This should hopefully help with understanding the Project Start page. For example, it mentions that the device setup you make on the project page is saved as part of the project, and not as a global setup of Podium. So each project has its own device setup.

    You can share a device setup across multiple projects by using project templates. Once you have created a device setup that you want to reuse, save it as a project template. When you have opened another project, you can load that device setup into the project using the menu: “project > project templates > load device setup”.

    in reply to: Audio-stretching suggestions! #17350
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @pernst wrote:

    Fritz,

    I really appreciate all the work you have been doing on the application, it really is becoming easier to work with and looking great! I say this because the ever discontent masses must wear you good nature thin. Of course, I am bumping this thread to wear another layer off. The activity that takes me out Podium is correcting the timing of performances using the stretching functionality of another application. It would be a great benefit to me to have this capability in Podium.

    Thanks for your time,
    Paul

    Exquisite wording 🙂

    I’m working my way towards it. Before I start on time-stretching, I’d like to finish some lose ends I have with the track management. I can’t give a time-estimate yet.

    in reply to: Loading effects into podium #17347
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    I’m using the Kjaerhus plugins under Vista, so that is not the problem. If you are having trouble locating the .zip files you downloaded from the website, try looking in the “Downloads” folder in your user folder with the Windows file explorer. You’ll need to extract the plugin .dll files from the zip files and place them in the folder where you keep your VST plugins. If you previously have installed some VST plugins, there is a chance that you already have a VSTplugins folder somewhere. If so, copy the .dll files to that folder. Otherwise just manually create a “VSTplugins” folder.

    Podium should detect if you have a VSTPlugins folder in the expected locations. If you select the “New Project” command, you can see the “VST plugin scan folders” that Podium has found on the “Create New Project” page. If your folder is not there, click the configure button to manually point to the folder where you have put your plugins. Once you have done that, create the project, and Podium should create mappings for all your plugins.

    Frits

    in reply to: W7-Microsoft Multimedia Class Scheduler #17332
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    I don’t have a W7 PC yet, so I can only speculate. Currently Podium does not call MMCSS, but I would expect it should be the audio driver that should set up its thread with MMCSS. It’s the audio driver that calls into Podium, and so the audio driver controls the thread. I could be mistaken though. Generally I will not recommend changing the registry as suggested in the topic you linked, unless you know how to undo your changes.

    in reply to: Podium Releases #17331
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    • Arrangement zoom snapshots.
    • Revised the way that track heights are handled.

    Topic: 2.25

    in reply to: Preview 2.25: Zoom snapshots & revised track height zoom #17329
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    Navigator looks great!
    My only gripe is that the “snapshot preview” is rather hard to see most of the time, but especially when previewing a snapshot that’s smaller than the current zoom range.

    Can you really tell where it is in this picture (thumbnail)?

    My suggestion: Instead of showing both the current zoom range and the preview, temporarily remove the zoom pane and only highlight the snapshot area. The current snapshot preview doesn’t have the zoom pane’s handles, so I think the chance of someone mistaking it for the actual zoom pane is not very high anyway.

    Good suggestion. Try the new beta5.

    Beta5 also has a few bug fixes. If no bugs are reported for this beta, I’ll release 2.25 this weekend.

    Follow focus track is nice too, but as expected, it doesn’t work with the embedded editor.
    I thought about suggesting the tracks view should scroll to the focus track whenever it gets out of view (unless you manually scroll away from it, of course) – if you didn’t want that, you could just disable follow focus track on the ‘Editor’ editor profile.
    However, this poses another problem, as the event opened in the editor is not necessarily on the focus track at all. 😕

    So the best solution I can think of right now would be reworking it to just “Follow Selection” – as in follow whatever is actively selected (track or event)… I think that’d work very well. :-k

    The purpose of the “Follow focus track” option, is to link track navigation between the mixer and the tracks region. I think extending it to react to event selection can result in mysterious scrolls, as long as it is possible to select events on other than the focus track.

    in reply to: 2.24 #17328
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    A little weirdeness again: If you adjust an audio event’s volume handle and while dragging, move the cursor near the edge of the tracks region, it will start scrolling lightning-fast: Example GIF (the same happens if you increase volume on a track further down, of course). The area in the example is very cramped, but this happens to me sometimes when I’m on the mixer page, where the tracks view only gets ~40% of the screen. Of course it should scroll if you try to move an event up or down, but not while dragging handles, I think.

    Fixed. Thanks.

    Edit2: A similar thing occurs when you’re resizing a track near the bottom edge. The grabbed edge of the track doesn’t follow the cursor anymore after you hit the scroll area at the bottom: Example GIF.

    I think this has been fixed with the new track height system implemented in the 2.25 beta. Let me know if you still have this problem.

    I’ve also got a question related to this: What’s the point of being able to scroll down far, far below the last track, almost into infinity? Shouldn’t it behave more like the navigator, stopping when only the last track is visible anymore? Edit: Oh yeah, after you scrolled down so far you no longer see any tracks, the navigator still falsly displays events on the bottom track as visible.

    I could add a limit, but I generally try to avoid imposing limits like these. Same reason you can (almost) scroll the timeline to infinity. If the topmost vertical position should be limited to the bottom of the last track, then various UI actions would cause the tracks region to scroll automatically. Say you have zoomed in on one of the bottom tracks. If you then collapse the master group track (in the mixer) this would cause the tracks region to scroll upwards to the now minmized tracks. When you then expand the master group track again you have lost the previous zoom position.

    in reply to: Preview 2.25: Zoom snapshots & revised track height zoom #17324
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Mike G wrote:

    – When trying to zoom out past the ends of the current selection It’s harder to zoom out so that you can add more stuff after the end of the current arrangement, much harder than it was with a scroll bar. I will just add the scroll bar back in in my profile but wonder if the default setup could be made better. Can you think of a way of making this work in the navigator in an intuitive way?
    The bext idea I can come up with is to allow scrolling of the navigator past the end of the last item in the arrangement.

    I’ve enabled dragging the zoom pane beyond the length of the arrangement. I think it works ok.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,546 through 1,560 (of 5,969 total)