Zynewave's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 5,969 total)
  • in reply to: 1.97 beta 1 #11458
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    o.k. i used scan and import mono/stereo but the zynewave are still outside the zynewave folder and do not load automatically like before.

    Ahh, yes. That’s because Podium searches for the Zynewave plugins in a subfolder of the folder where the Podium executable is run. If you move the Podium197_beta1.exe to the “C:Program FilesZynewavePodium” and run it from there, then the Zynewave plugins should import automatically.

    when i choose delete fx from track the device menu in the inspector changes view to show audio outputs and zynewave fx folders as open (-).

    The inspector device panel will default to show the nearest mapping for the current track. When you remove an effect from the track, then it will locate the nearest mapping on a parent track (shown ghosted in the device panel header).

    in reply to: 1.97 beta 1 #11456
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @sam c wrote:

    Frits, when i close all of the headings in device, like audio outputs and zynewave effects (from – to +), why do those two default back to open (-) after i select a device? only those two devices, audio out and zynewave fx.

    I don’t understand this. Can you explain in more details, please.

    in reply to: 1.97 beta 1 #11455
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Did you use the “create new project” page?

    Make sure the “scan and import mono/stereo plugins” check button is selected. Otherwise the Zynewave plugins will not be imported. For the 1.97 release I’m going to extend zPEQ and zPitch so that they are surround capable, which means they will also be imported if you only select the import surround check button.

    in reply to: Frits, would you please consider #11452
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    I’ve uploaded a beta with the WaveShell support. Please check the topic below for a list of changes and reply in that topic with any problems you may encounter.

    http://www.zynewave.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1532

    in reply to: The master track #11451
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @blackstar wrote:

    Will the auto-sizing of the bounce tracks below the master track just be to the length of their child tracks or the whole arrangement?

    I think it will be to the whole arrangement. The length of the child track may not be long enough, if there are reverbs or other effects that generate audio after the child note/audio tracks have stopped.

    in reply to: The master track #11445
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    The master track is the topmost track in the track hierarchy. Its main purpose is to route the combined mix of all the child tracks to an audio output. You can select the output on the master track header. As a secondary purpose the master track is by default configured as a bounce track. The bounce sound on the master track is thus used to render the master output of the arrangement to a wave file. You can remove the bounce option on the master track if you don’t intend to export your arrangement for mp3 encoding etc.

    Is there a way to get it to automatically fit to the rest of the tracks?

    Not currently. I plan to add an option to the track properties that will autosize sequence/sound events to the full length of the arrangement. Bounce tracks will have this option enabled by default.

    in reply to: Frits, would you please consider #11440
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    I downloaded the Waves 360 bundle, and it installed without crashing :o.

    I’ve now implemented full support for the WaveShell feature. This means that importing the WaveShell-VST.dll no longer pops up the menu for selecting a single Waves plugin, but instead automatically creates mappings for all installed Waves plugins. I am doing some further revisions of the VST support, and I expect to release a beta in a few days.

    in reply to: meter calibration? #11439
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    It is not forgotten. I can’t say when I’ll get around to it. Currently there are quite a few features with higher priority on the todo list.

    in reply to: Frits, would you please consider #11437
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Today I decided to install the Diamond 5.0 demo bundle I downloaded from the Waves website. First time running the installer, it soon exited with a request to restart Windows. This made me anxious as this was an indication that it had installed some low-level service most likely related to its copy protection mechanism. On Windows restart the installer started again, and then presented the blue-screen-of-death with a message saying: “An attempt was made to execute non-executable memory”. Unbelievable! 👿

    I can then power-off/on to reboot without the installer starting automatically, but running the installer manually again results in the same BSOD. This is on a standard Dell PC, 2GB memory, running XP Pro. The PC has never had a USB-dongle inserted, and there has never been any warez or cracked software installed. I now have to live with the uncertainty that Windows stability on my PC may have been compromized by this installer.

    I experienced something similar many years ago (on an older PC), also with a plugin demo that installed some protection software. This is why I since have stayed away from any Pace/iLok kind of protection. But I figured that they would have got it working after so many years. I’ll try to download one of the other Waves bundles, to see if I can get something installed that will allow me to test the WaveShell implementation in Podium.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Compact tracks and crash #11434
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Confirmed. I’ll fix this for the next release. Thanks.

    in reply to: 1.96 #11427
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Thanks for all the comments.

    @Conquistador wrote:

    I guess the more recent transparent Beta process is making it bit tricky to keep track of all the changes. I am pretty sure you have a change log of sorts to reference as you go along so maybe this just slipped through the net, unless you think this change is not really worth a mention.?!?

    I’ve added your swap panel text to the original feature post. I didn’t forget about it, as I figured it could go under the “redesigned inspector” part. Still it is worth mentioning as it affects workflow and not only appearance.

    in reply to: Podium Releases #11416
    Zynewave
    Keymaster
    • Redesigned the track inspector and added a color picker.

    Topic: 1.96

    in reply to: Podium attempts to access the Internet during a scan???? #11413
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    The downside of that (minimal but still) is that the “Podium User Community” command/link in Podium will not work if Podium has been blocked as an application from accessing the Internet.

    That command only attempts to open a website link using whatever internet browser is installed on the OS, so I doubt that you would get a warning on this.

    in reply to: Podium attempts to access the Internet during a scan???? #11410
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Perhaps I have misunderstood you here, I said before in my previous post “the scan was successful” and AFAICT Podium adds a plugin to the quarantine list automatically..how would I manually edit this file?

    If you do a rescan, and the scanning skips plugins found on the quarantine list, the message box appearing at the end of the scan has an “Open Quarantine List” button. You can also open the PluginQuarantine.txt with a file explorer. The file is located in the same folder as the Podium.ini file.

    The firewall warning does not seem to appear once the plugin is on the quarantine list.

    Makes sense, since I’m guessing it was the quarantined plugin that was the cause for the internet access. I would guess that this plugin is using an OS service to send a crash report to the developer.

    You said that “Podium does NOT contain any code that accesses the internet” but even if the plugin is the culprit to a user clearly Podium is trying to access the internet based on the information in that screengrab I posted.

    Podium.exe is calling functions in the plugin dll. The dll can do anything it wants, including accessing the internet, but to the OS it will appear as if the Podium “application” is the sinner. Likewise if the plugin crashes or mistakingly overwrites memory used by Podium, it will appear as if Podium is crashing. Podium cannot prevent this. There are alternative methods of isolating plugins in separate processes to improve security, but this will affect performance.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,091 through 3,105 (of 5,969 total)