@frollo9386 wrote:
… is a FR you’re considering to add to the sequencer?
It is a feature I intend to add in the future. I have no estimate for when it will appear.
@adimatis: A host can support MIDI parameter control of a plugin, by intercepting MIDI messages from a controller, and convert them to VST parameter messages for the plugin. This means the host needs to store information in the host project file about which MIDI messages are to be linked to which plugin VST parameters.
@frollo9386 wrote:
so it’s not possible to set a midi CC to control a parameter in the vst synth unless the vst plugin support itself midi learn?
Correct.
I can’t tell from the website whether the Antti synths support MIDI learn. If the plugin knobs do not move when you move a knob on your MIDI controller, my guess is that they don’t support MIDI learn. Perhaps you could try with the Zynewave Nucleum plugin, which do support MIDI control of all parameters.
In which plugin are you trying to control the cutoff?
@michi_mak wrote:
@Zynewave wrote:
Unfortunately, I don’t know when implementation of time-stretching will begin. Right now, my todo-list is overflowing with minor things that have been requested over the years, and I intend to thin out that list before I start on new major features. I doubt that time-stretching will be implemented this year.
Frits, would you mind giving some rough ideas about this to-do list???
I keep a list of bookmarks to topics in this forum that deal with stuff I agree should be improved/fixed. This list has currently grown to 50 topics. To keep my sanity, I’d like to thin out this list before moving on to new major features.
@kozaberger wrote:
Hi All, I am new to this forum, greetings from Poland 🙂
To the subject – I will probably buy Podium as soon as I have collected money. Time stretching is not critical for me (I’d rather opt for sample rate conversion). However, Zynewave, would you consider using an external library like:
http://breakfastquay.com/rubberband/Maybe it would spare you some development? Just a guess, I am not a programmer.
Anyway thanks for the great work on Podium and generousity with Podium Free!
Hi, welcome to the forum.
Thanks for the link. I already have a simple technology for time-stretching, similar to what this library offers, although my technology is probably lower quality. What is going to require a lot of development time, is integrating it into the Podium UI and audio engine.
Unfortunately, I don’t know when implementation of time-stretching will begin. Right now, my todo-list is overflowing with minor things that have been requested over the years, and I intend to thin out that list before I start on new major features. I doubt that time-stretching will be implemented this year.
Beta3 is up. The zip contains 8 files. Podium.exe and the three zPlugins, in both x86 and x64 builds.
The Podium x86 build is not changed much compared to 2.42, but the three x86 plugins are now compiled using the same tool I’m using for Podium. I’m seeing perhaps 5% performance improvement in zPEQ. Haven’t tested performance on the other two. Please report if you notice any differences with the new zPlugin builds.
I’m done with the coding for 2.43, unless bugs appear. Now I only need to work on a new installer.
@4mica wrote:
Not to sound impatient or a worrywart, but when do you expect the new version to come out? It’s been very quiet here the past few weeks-
I have completed the porting of zPEQ, zReverb and zPitch to x64. I need to test those a couple of days before I’ll post a new beta. The zPlugins have not been updated for years, so I also had to spend some time adjusting them for the latest version of the developer tool I am using for Podium. The good news is that this should make them more CPU efficient, and it will be easier for me to work on new zPlugins in the future.
Unfortunately I also have to spend some time looking for a new installer tool. The current installer I’m using does not support x64 distributions.
Key customization is on the future list, but I don’t have a time estimate.
Cool video 8)
Is it ok if I add it as a favorite to my channel?
@Conquistador wrote:
Looks the Rapture update solved the crashes with the plugin. :-k So far so good. 😉
Sounds great. Have you had a chance to evaluate whether there are any CPU performance differences between Podium x86 and x64?
Beta2 is uploaded. This zip file contains both an x86 and x64 version. New feature:
Added “Enable jBridge x86/x64 VST plugin wrapping” option to the preferences dialog. The jBridge third-party software can be used to load both 32-bit and 64-bit VST plugins when running Podium x86/x64 on a 64-bit Windows OS. Podium will detect if jBridge is installed, and invoke it when scanning and loading VST plugins that use a different processor architecture. It is not necessary to use the jBridger tool to create wrapped dll files.
The jBridge demo can be downloaded from:
@adimatis wrote:
Would “the basic components for a crude time-stretch and pitch shift” be more ready for release now? I’d love seeing that implemented!
No progress in this area, sorry. I’ll be using the simple stretching algo I implemented for zPitch, when I start work on time-stretching. Check out zPitch to evaluate whether you think the quality is acceptable.
@Conquistador wrote:
Did some *basic* quick stress testing…
Many thanks for the extensive testing. I’m glad to see you posting again 🙂