Topic: when will it be possible

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 50 total)
  • #8725
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Since it is a VST plugin, you can export the zGrid preset a a .fxp file and import into other projects.

    Ok…yes that makes sense (as any other VST FX) but I meant would it be possible for instance to save a chain of FX like a Compressor+EQ+Chorus in the zGrid, save and then and load that into any other project?

    #8726
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    @Conquistador wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Since it is a VST plugin, you can export the zGrid preset a a .fxp file and import into other projects.

    Ok…yes that makes sense (as any other VST FX) but I meant would it be possible for instance to save a chain of FX like a Compressor+EQ+Chorus in the zGrid, save and then and load that into any other project?

    The zGrid preset will contain both the routing of effects as well as the presets for the individual effects.

    #8731
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    The zGrid preset will contain both the routing of effects as well as the presets for the individual effects.

    That’s fantastic thanks! 🙂

    #9476
    koolkeys
    Participant

    Ok, so wait. Is ZGrid something that is not there yet? I don’t see it, so I’m hoping that is not a bad question.

    Brent

    #9478
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Is ZGrid something that is not there yet?

    I haven’t started development of zGrid yet. Just throwing ideas around here 😉

    #9485
    koolkeys
    Participant

    Cool, thanks!

    #9492
    Speed
    Participant

    As new user demoing Podium (picked up the Computer Music 1.77 version), the zGrid functionality will be a very important addition.

    #9494
    haiku
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    @Conquistador wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Since it is a VST plugin, you can export the zGrid preset a a .fxp file and import into other projects.

    Ok…yes that makes sense (as any other VST FX) but I meant would it be possible for instance to save a chain of FX like a Compressor+EQ+Chorus in the zGrid, save and then and load that into any other project?

    The zGrid preset will contain both the routing of effects as well as the presets for the individual effects.

    This is the best way, this way people can create complex presets in Seigrid for certain situations. For instance, people could make a preset that has their favorite filter with an LFO on it chained to a delay set at 3/16 for an instant tarnce preset. 😆

    #10178
    iain
    Participant

    @Conquistador wrote:

    I suspect many people who do not ‘get’ the way Podium does things at the demo stage, will be very unlikely to take the time to post here and discuss it. They will likely just move on to the next option.

    Hello,

    I demoed Podium yesterday after reading positive comments about it on kvr.

    I’m afraid I didn’t ‘get’ it. 🙁

    But I do want to take a moment to explain why. Four key reasons:

      1. Inability to load a VST and VSTi in the same track. I see how this is more like a hardware mixer, but as noted elsewhere in this thread, it’s a facility I now expect in a DAW.

      2. Drag and drop from Stylus RMX was strange. At first this seemed not to work at all…then it turned out to be dropping the MIDI file into an additional organiser panel (sorry, I don’t know the name of that panel) from which I had to move it into the arrangement. Too many clicks, sorry.

      3. Waves VST plugins didn’t work properly, but I appreciate this is probably because of their Waveshell system. When Podium ‘imported’ the VSTs, I was offered a list of all the Waves plugins to which the Waveshell VST links. I could choose only one – the others were then unavailable.

      4. Drawing together points 1 and 2, the VST/VSTi handling was mysterious.

      On the one hand it was beautifully easy to open a plugin and select a program for it. But on the other hand the names of the VSTs were a bit of a shambles – different to how they appear in other VSTs. Multiple instances of the same VST all with the same name and further sub-categories (Stylus and Absynth are two examples of VSTs that looked confusing).

      Also mysterious was the difference between the VST chooser panel on the left of the screen and the other panel (where the Stylus MIDI files went) on the right.

      Finally regarding the VSTs, Podium ‘imported’ them at length each time I opened the program – pretty time consuming.

    There were also many things I liked about the program (responsiveness, download size, cost, 64 bit facilities, etc), but I’m afraid these difficulties switched me off and led me to delete the demo. Sorry. However I thought the least I could do was post here my reasons so that my impressions can be considered when developing Podium in the future.

    One last thing: reading the forum, I see there may have been some issues with getting sustain working. If that’s still the case (I didn’t test it), that too would have been a deal-breaker for me. The lack of immediate sustain support in earlier versions of FL Studio was the reason I stopped using that DAW. For my style of playing, sustain support is necessary ‘out of the box’.

    Anyhow, just my thoughts. I wish Podium the best of luck! For now I’ve uninstalled it, but maybe I’ll demo it again when the ‘chainer’ facility is added.

    #10179
    Zynewave
    Keymaster

    Thanks for your feedback iain.

    1. Inability to load a VST and VSTi in the same track. I see how this is more like a hardware mixer, but as noted elsewhere in this thread, it’s a facility I now expect in a DAW.

    You can only have one mapping on each track, but the idea is that you chain together tracks to make a chain of e.g. VSTi > VSTe > sends. This allows for more flexibility but the challenge is to make it easy to handle the setup of the chains. This is a part of the UI that I’m focusing on currently. Recently there have been a number of improvements to the mixer, and I’m continuing work on this.

    2. Drag and drop from Stylus RMX was strange.

    Proper support for drag and drop from plugin editors and external media browsers was implemented in 1.88/1.89. There is no demo version of these releases, but the next 1.90 will be released as a demo.

    3. Waves VST plugins didn’t work properly, but I appreciate this is probably because of their Waveshell system

    It’s been a long time since I last tried any Waves plugins, but from what I remember: Once you have selected a plugin from the Waves popup menu, Podium logs this code in the mapping so that the same plugin is opened the following times. To use additional Waves plugins you need to import the plugin multiple times, each time selecting a different plugin from the popup. You then won’t be bothered with the Waves popup when you assign the plugins on tracks.

    On the one hand it was beautifully easy to open a plugin and select a program for it. But on the other hand the names of the VSTs were a bit of a shambles – different to how they appear in other VSTs. Multiple instances of the same VST all with the same name and further sub-categories (Stylus and Absynth are two examples of VSTs that looked confusing).

    These are “global” plugins (as opposed to “insert” plugins). They have multiple mappings that you use to access the same instance of the plugin.

    Finally regarding the VSTs, Podium ‘imported’ them at length each time I opened the program – pretty time consuming.

    To avoid the reimport: Once you have created your first project, and have imported all your plugins, you can save that project as a template with the file menu. The next time you start on a new project, you select this template from the new project submenu.

    One last thing: reading the forum, I see there may have been some issues with getting sustain working.

    Since then, I have implemented a menu popup in the parameter panel, which have shortcut menus for creating default MIDI parameters, including sustain.

    Frits

    #10180
    iain
    Participant

    Thanks very much for the fast and informative reply.

    Whilst I still have some reservations about the mapping/chaining system, I’ll look forward to trying the next demo and exploring the features you mentioned.

    I must say that it is rare to get this kind of detailed support when you’re not actually a customer (yet)! Thanks! 8)

    #10210
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Hi Iain,

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    2. Drag and drop from Stylus RMX was strange. At first this seemed not to work at all…then it turned out to be dropping the MIDI file into an additional organiser panel (sorry, I don’t know the name of that panel) from which I had to move it into the arrangement. Too many clicks, sorry.

    I think the “addtional organiser panel” is the List view. Any drag and drop operation from Stylus (I have Stylus RMX) should result in the file dropping exactly where you want it in the arrangement. If you are using version 1.89 onwards.

    I think 1.87 is the latest demo that does not AFAICT, have the new drag and drop feature. Older demos can certainly give the wrong impression. I would guess Frits will update the demo soon. 😉

    #10212
    iain
    Participant

    Thanks Conquistador.

    I’m definitely going to demo the program again. Coming from Ableton Live, I’m impressed by the relative stability and inexpensiveness of Podium – as well by as the responsiveness of Frits to suggestions and feedback.

    #10213
    rinxai
    Participant

    Before discovering Podium, I believed Ableton Live was the shiznit. I was wrong. IMO, Podium offers a much more robust and stable setup specifically for arranging songs, which with the low price is a deal maker. The MIDI sync problem in Ableton is a deal breaker, plus it is relatively expansive. Live shines as a realtime sketchpad and performance tool, and has a bunch of first class MIDI and audio effects, which is Podium’s current weakness. However I trust that Frits will bring the additional functionality bit by byte. Hang in and checkout the next demo, even better, buy it. :mrgreen:

    #10750
    musicmakeruk
    Participant

    I’m finding it hard to get my head around the zGrid concept. Are you saying:

    1. It’s like a guitar pedal rig where the signal goes into the first pedal, through the others and out the last one to the amp; turning each one on and off as needed?

    If so, how would two different tracks be able to use different combination of effects?

    Or

    2. The effects are stored in the grid and you plug your track into each individual effect that you need, in the order you want them, using patch cables?

    Or something completely different?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 50 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© 2021 Zynewave