Conquistador's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,598 total)
  • in reply to: Project/Arrangement export/import #11677
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    This is an area that I’m going to improve on in a future update.

    Yes please. The VST structure issue as well as changing hardware are two major issues I have in Podium still. Solving the Automapping issue would massively simplify a crucial aspect of Podium.

    Also extending Podiums functionality to include better file copy management would be a huge help as well.

    Cheers!

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11672
    Conquistador
    Participant

    Thanks for taking the time to expand your views on this a bit more. I was a bit confused by your response 🙂

    @Zynewave wrote:

    What I gather from the article, was that a major part of the development time was spent figuring out how to lay out the ribbon control, and what commands should be available in the ribbon.

    Correct. Yes.

    Implementing the basic functionality of a ribbon control in Podium is not a problem, but it is going to take a HUGE amount of time to figure out what the ribbon should contain.

    Yes and no IMO. Yes a longer time if we re organise the existing menus into a more logical workflow UI (greater benefit) but no it should not take long at all to figure out the contents of the tabs if you approach the idea using the first suggestion I made as to how to implement it…

    “1. Keep the current groups as they are but place them in their own ribbon. So instead of a drop down menu each for File, Edit, View and Setup we could use tabs with a Ribbon underneath it showing the contents of those tabs.”

    Or put another way…the tabs in the ribbon will mirror the existing menu contents exactly as they are now.

    Your suggestions for the main tabs is the easy part. It’s almost certain that each Podium user would want something different in the ribbon, possibly more so than the typical MS word user.

    I can see how people might want there own variation of the ribbon but if you simply move the current menus for File, View e.t.c into a ribbon UI tabbed design, the actual layout would be identical to the current one.

    Difference? No more drop down menus. That is really all I was suggesting… a further refinement of an already very good design, not a massive overhaul of a desparately problematic UI. Far from it.

    I did say if I could I would pay you to design all day and you know I have many times said how much I admire your design skills over the years. It is quite obvious you really know your way around UI design.

    Personally I cannot see how a Podium user would want more variations in a ribbon in Podium than a MS word user. That is why I suggested option 1 to eradicate that problem if it became a problem.

    Word users cover the globe with hundreds of millions of users with easily just as many different approaches to Word. I understand how we might want different things in it (using my second suggestion) but surely not ever nearly on the scale of variation as Microsofts globally used Word product customer base! 🙂

    That’s why I originally designed the editor profile system, which allows the user to configure the entire workspace

    Personally I really like this idea. It is very powerful and very flexible.

    The editor profile is very powerful. I like it. No question, Perhaps an idea from a Microsoft product brings images of bloat, lost productivity and an overpriced product…I was not a great fan of Word 2002 at all, and used it out of necessity but it is the complete opposite now. To my total amazement.

    The Editor profile could possibly be extended to allow for users to add whatever they want to the ribbon. No need to spend time thinking about every users possible variation, let a user choose. The Editor profile will not / cannot do away with drop down menus. The ribbon can.

    Also it would be a USP for Podium. You do not have massive marketing budgets and huge amounts of exposure but a good idea (not found elsewhere) can go a very long way.

    Please bear in mind the idea for the placement of this ribbon is very much like the mixer (can easily be dragged out of the way) but instead of dragging it upwards this would be dragged downwards into view so it would not visually impact users who would not make use of it.

    Having said all that Frits, I am very happy to side step the idea of it being in Podium if you feel it is too much work for you either now or in future. Or even if you feel it’s just not for you (as Podium is your product). It was really just an idea but other Podium users have equally important, creative suggestions and views that should be equally considered as well. 🙂

    in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11670
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @UncleAge wrote:

    I would only add that if Frits were to adopt this type of interface maybe a function key could be assigned to make it go away much like the F7 key functions for the mixer (I use that F7 key a lot!). And maybe not entirely away. Maybe this function key would toggle between the full-blown ribbon and a custom/minimal set of controls for the power/seasoned users. Just my $.02.

    Sounds fine to me. I always saw it as something optional and I know you are not trying to be argumentative. Each view expressed here on this forum is just as important as any other (post count or not) IMO. I am always interested in other peoples opinions. 😉

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Thanks for the link. I did not know anything about the “ribbon” control. I don’t see myself applying this to Podium in the near future. If it took a bunch of MS engineers three years and three total rewrites before getting this right for MS word, I think I better stick to my current design!

    Hi Frits. Judging by your terrified repsonse 😆

    “If it took a bunch of MS engineers three years and three total rewrites before getting this right for MS word, I think I better stick to my current design!”

    …it sounds like you think the idea is bringing Microsofts ‘problem’ to Podium, the only way I can see you coming to that conclusion is if you read the article link, but not my suggested adaptation of the solution found in that article by Microsoft for Podium, which is explained in the rest of my post earlier.

    I was was referring to the solution they found being adapted to Podium not bringing the problem they had to Podium! 🙂 Podium of course does not have the problem Microsoft had…not currently has.

    The idea is to enhance what Podium has already with the ribbon UI idea (which is a solution not strangely as you see it, a problem for Microsoft engineers) not sure what the connection is here.

    If your reason for not being interested is because it took Microsoft 3 years to get it right….I am bit puzzled about that. Would it be more of interest to you if they took 3 weeks to get it right or 3 days? 🙂 Surely the time frame to find a soltuon has nothing to do with the use of the solution.

    I am just trying to understand your comments here.

    It’s like saying you don’t like the idea because you don’t want their problem. What problem is that? They don’t have the problem any more.

    The reason why I explained the idea in detail was so you could see how their solution can be adpated into Podium. 75% of PC Pro’s readership liked the ribbon. It’s different of course but has to be, to improve upon the previous design. It’s far better than any menu UI I have ever used in any app. by a long way. So much more logical and easier to use.

    But as with any idea some will like it some will not. Nothing wrong with that. But if your fear a “Microsoft problem” making it’s way into Podium then I don’t think you read my post past the article link which might explain your response. Seriously. It’s the solution I am suggesting but it sounds like you think it’s Microsofts problem I am suggesting. Which I don’t understand. I am now far more interested in the reason for your comment than if you like the idea or not. 🙂

    I also think that there are features in Podium that can accommodate for the different tasks and workflows that you go through in the creative process. I’m thinking about the project start page, and the possibility to create different editor profiles that you can quickly swap between with F8.

    Yes, of course there are features in Podium that already accomodate the different tasks one would go through during any creative process. Many. I am not sure why you think the suggestion I made suggests that is not already the case. The ribbon UI idea is a refinement of those creative options in Podium.

    Anyway…it’s up to you it was just an idea I had based on my own experience that I think as an optional feature would be fantastic. I think this idea is far better than any UI idea I have ever seen. But in any case as always lets see how the next update ( 1.98 ) evolves 🙂

    in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11652
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Comments?

    If I could I would pay you to simply design all day! Really nice Frits. :mrgreen:

    I was going to make some suggestions for Podiums UI but I have simply not had the time for a full mock up but I think this screen shot should tell the story…

    A ribbon for Podium to eliminate drop down menus (or at least make them optional).

    I read this articleon UI design and it was quite an eye opener. I definitely suggest you read it at some point and indeed anyone else interested in UI design in more detail.

    The idea in more detail:

    Arrangement properties should be taken care of on the Project start page before the arrangement is created. So the tabs for a new look UI for Podium could be for…

    Composition
    Editing
    Mixing
    Mastering
    Save

    Or (as it would be seen on screen horizontally)

    Tabs for Composition Editing Mixing Mastering Save

    Something that provides a logical progression for a producer. One would compose first , mix then (if doing so internally) move on to Mastering. Editing I would say might be placed aftercomposing as a tab.

    This kind of placement of tabs is incredibly efficient for workflow and as of today I do not know of any host that provides this kind of logical layout for menus.

    I have used Office 2007 for about 3 months now and there are many highly useful features in Word 2007, Excel 2007 and Outlook 2007 that were there all along that I just could not find easily and as a result not used them until now. The ribbon interface is far more logical, faster and incredibly intuitive to use.

    Notice that the tabs are arranged in terms of the order of tasks you are likely to perform not just what you need. The order you will likely need them is the driver for the placement of the tabs. This makes far more sense.

    Microsoft were running out of space for drop down menus and were getting requests for features in Office 2007 that were already in Office 2003! They simply had too many drop down lists and menus.
    I initially tried the demo of Office 2007, Word 2007 in particular and was sold on the new interface very quickly.

    It is sooooooooo different from the older drop down menu approach. I am getting things done far quicker and getting far more value for money out of the software as a result.

    Also amazingly I have zero need for right clicking. Every feature I need is accessible from that Ribbon at the top. You can work in Word 2007 without anything ever dropping down to obscure your workplace. Same screenspace as previous versions of word but this time that same space is being put to far better use.

    So how would this grouping work in Podium ?

    Two ways…

    1. Keep the current groups as they are but place them in their own ribbon. So instead of a drop down menu each for File, Edit, View and Setup we could use tabs with a Ribbon underneath it showing the contents of those tabs.

    Something that can be dragged into view like the mixer so that one can easily revert back the older drop down menus if need be. A global option would be a good idea to set and forget.

    2. Re structure the menus to reflect a logical workflow pattern. Something that will fit into a Save Compose Edit Mix Master Ribbon layout.

    Even track level options can fit into these tabs as well as the File, View e.t.c menus to eliminate the need to use them. Everything as in Word 2007 can be accessed from a logical palcement of tabs that mirror a typical users workflow.

    Thoughts?

    in reply to: Locking sound events #11651
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @acousmod wrote:

    Yes, you and I have already asked for this fundamental feature :
    http://www.zynewave.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7110

    I hope that it will be eventually available too…

    Funny that, the thread in that link is a year old. I thought it was today but it is almost an exact year ago! 🙂

    It is a nice feature, looking forward to seeing it in Podium at some point definitely.

    in reply to: Preferences #11650
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @acousmod wrote:

    Draw a volume enveloppe or a plugin automation, mute the track during playing, unmute it : all the enveloppes are ignored…
    You have to stop and restart playing.

    Frits, can you solve this, please ?

    Just checked this again it’s still there. I would certainly be very grateful for a fix here please.

    in reply to: Speaking of meters! #11628
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @jpleong wrote:

    Would it be possible to add (at least an option) an “omni control room” meter that runs across the whole length of the bottom of the application? I really like having one in Adobe Audition: http://www.softpedia.com/screenshots/Adobe-Audition_1.png

    Great idea! Samplitude has something similar as well.

    This could be implemented as a new region that you could insert in the arrangement editor profile.

    But there are a lot of more important things on my todo list.

    I haven’t made anything using K-system, but it is not forgotten. Again a priority issue.

    When this feature makes it into Podium it will be a really useful addition to the current features. Just like the Large Transport which I use in my default set up in Podium now. The larger meter is a superb way to keep track of db levels but in more detail. I’m really looking forward to seeing this in Podium as it was one of my favourite features in Samplitude.

    in reply to: FR: Meters. #11607
    Conquistador
    Participant

    @Igr0 wrote:

    Why not to implement meters on every ch. strip. So we can see the signal strenght i db. Who else think that this function is useful? Thnx.

    I assume you mean on each track in the arranger if that is the case I definitely agree. I made some suggestions for that here.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Conquistador
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,598 total)
© 2021 Zynewave