@sam c wrote:
Conquistador, i was looking at your set up description above. are your pre master and analysis tracks child tracks of the master track?
thanks
Hi,
Well they are Child Tracks but I did not use the New Child Track command… let me explain…
If you have a project with say 10 tracks and you then go to the Master out track or the top most track in the tree and attempt to create a New Child track it will appear under the 10th track in your project.
Not what you might want. Of course you could drag it into place but I simply created a template.
First the master out…
Then 2 or 3 new tracks underneath feeding into the next. Have a look at the picture…
Click for a larger image…
I actually use two Analysis tracks in this project. I then renamed the tracks and placed my mappings on them for any new projects in future. Of course now any track I create under those tracks will feed through them up to the master bounce track. 😉
I can easily enable bouncing on the Pre master to get a Pre view or snapshot of my mix in real time with any mastering plug I choose to place on that track… swap out the mastering plug with another and create as many different versions of the mix as I want. Of course I could have a full mastering chain of plugs by having 3 – 5 pre master tracks with mappings and work with that. 😉
I can then easily place those (if I want to keep two or three Pre master bounced versions that I like) at the bottom of the arrangement in new tracks and rename them accordingly.
Of course I can also tap the tree from any point and bounce enable any of the pre master tracks for instance to get any type of pre master version I want…very flexible. 😉
That is just my workflow…there is likely a quicker or more preferable way to do it for you or anyone else. 😉 Podiums high level of flexiblity easily allows for the track arrangement I use. 😉
The Pre Master and Analysis tracks feed into the Master track right at the top of the tree, so yes they are child tracks, but the New Child track command (as far as I know) will not create child tracks directly under the master out if you already have for example a number of tracks under the master out.
But the tree level will correctly be “2” (two layers or levels down) feeding directly into the master out so it will be a child but not visibly directly under the master track unless you drag it there.
I hope that helps 😉
@Zynewave wrote:
This gave me an idea for a mixer docking feature. I’ve added a “dock master chain” option to the mixer:
This has a couple of benefits: The master output section is always visible no matter what audio tracks are shown in the scrollable section.
Very good, this will make things even clearer when working in the mixer.
Having the master chain separated also saves the space for the master group headers above the regular audio tracks.
I tend to have two tracks under the default Master output track.
A Pre master track with a mastering plug used from time to time as the project builds up and an Analysis track which is useful for either running Span or FreeG to monitor levels in more detail and monitor frequencies used in individual tracks that have the solo button enabled, a subgroup of tracks or even the whole project.
Both of these tracks are above all my other tracks so all other tracks feed into the Anaysis track > Pre Master track and finally > Master output track.
Or another way…
Master Output track
>Pre Master
>>Analysis
>>>All other tracks in the arrangement
So will my my Analysis track and Pre Master Track show up in the new dock master chain?
Is it user configurable?
I’m going to experiment with a “dock bus returns” option, which similarly separates any bus return track chains from the scrollable section and docks them at either right or left side.
That would be very helpful especially being able to dock the area on the right or left side. That sort of functionality may likely elevate Podiums mixer to a higher level of configurability than many hosts out there.
Would we also be able to dock the new master chain on either side of the mixer?
The mixer currently does not autoscroll to always keep the current track in view, but I could add an option for this.
Please do add this option Frits! Thanks!
The docked bus returns would always show all bus return groups, so no scrolling needed for this section.
Excellent.
@guy wrote:
Hey y’all,
Just a few questions that I didn’t see anywhere on this forum (a search option would have been nice). It would be nice to know if Podium will work on my new computer (when it gets out of the repair shop!). I have a Dell E520 with Pentium D Processors (dual) and running Vista OS. I also have a 24 inch wide screen and a 19 inch monitor.
I think the user Frits spoke of is most likely me 😉
Once the image has loaded click on it again for a full sized image
As far as I can tell the performance, reliability and operation of Podium is identical in Vista (Premium 32 bit here) to usage in XP.
It opens up fine, imports files, plays back e.t.c. in exactly the same way it does in XP. So if you want real world user feedback from someone else on a Pentium D, with Windows Vista then based on my experience it will work. I use a large widescreen with Podium on Vista.
Of course I cannot guarantee Podium will work on Vista for you but I see no reason at all why it should not work.
Projects are saved and re called correctly e.t.c everything seems 100% OK. Certainly my XP Podium usage mirrored on Vista has not produced any problems apart from a strange exit delay…Podium will take about 7 -10 seconds to close on Vista. It is almost instant on XP.
I cannot find anything else that is problematic on Vista with Podium.
A side issue not Zynewaves fault of course… Kjearhus plugs don’t appear to work on Vista yet (GAC, GMO GEQ) without throwing up some error messages and some other plugs have problems but as they are not officially Vista compatible yet problems with some plugs on Vista is to be expected I guess.
I think some Voxengo plugs are a bit erratic as well on Vista. YMMV.
@Frits…
Vista Home basic (upgrade) should not be more than £50 – £100
I currently dual boot and switch between Vista and XP.
I am 99.9% certain that any testing you do with Vista Home basic should be able to cover users of Premium, Business and Ulitmate (32 bit)versions of Vista. Podium already works on Vista Premium. Ultimate costs around £300 – £400, no need to spend that!
I have quoted these prices in pounds but it may even be cheaper than my £50 -£100 estimate to upgrade from your version of XP to Vista Home basic (upgrade version) from a local store near you in Denmark.
I think starting with a 32bit version of Vista would be a good idea as the 64 bit version is I think more expensive. Most users will likely start out with the 32 bit version of Vista I would have thought anyway.
It looks like there is only one bug on Vista to address as well 🙂 Not bad for an OS you have not even tested Podium with yet! 🙂
