Igr0's Forum Page « Zynewave

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)

1 2 3 →

March 17, 2008 at 06:43 in reply to: Preview: Zynewave Nucleum #11941

Igr0
Participant

And there is great explained video about FM synthesis. From this video you will realize that FM is very easy in theory. Enjoy.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=e4OWsez10Zg

February 13, 2008 at 14:25 in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11755

Igr0
Participant

Any beta on the way? 🙄

February 5, 2008 at 12:15 in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11707

Igr0
Participant

Only thing it’s no good, that midi and audio clips are TOO agressive ( especially yellow and green) IMO

February 5, 2008 at 11:37 in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11704

Igr0
Participant

It’s really nice!

January 28, 2008 at 10:02 in reply to: Preset changer… #11642

Igr0
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

So, if vsti don’t have browser, does it mean that i can change preset only in inspector?

You can change presets in the inspector, or using the track context menus.

I may add an option in the future to embed a preset changer in the plugin window frame.

Haaa! Thank you, Fritz 😀

January 25, 2008 at 10:42 in reply to: FR: Meters. #11623

Igr0
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

Ok, you mean a numeric meter value in addition to the graphic meter. That is on the future plan.

Yes, Fritz! :))) That is i talked about.

January 25, 2008 at 08:08 in reply to: FR: Meters. #11621

Igr0
Participant

I will post some pics today here from others hosts, so you will see what i mean. I mean signal metering on every track, including master track. It,s just a small box on the chan. strip which show peaks of output signals in number format. This value always changing.

January 24, 2008 at 14:26 in reply to: FR: Meters. #11608

Igr0
Participant

@Conquistador wrote:

@Igr0 wrote:

Why not to implement meters on every ch. strip. So we can see the signal strenght i db. Who else think that this function is useful? Thnx.

I assume you mean on each track in the arranger if that is the case I definitely agree. I made some suggestions for that here.

I meant each track in the mixer. Anyway your thread is exactly about that. I think is just musthave option.

December 1, 2007 at 08:15 in reply to: Will be ever Podium support skinning? #11359

Igr0
Participant

@Zynewave wrote:

Buttons, sliders and various shadow effects are not based on bitmaps but is algorithmically rendered by Podium on startup. The rendering depends on color setup, text sizes and user resizing of panels etc. So it is not a matter of simply allowing users to replace a default set of bitmaps.

Some elements can be made skinnable, such as the brushed metal texture. At some point I’ll probably support that.

Thnx. Looking forward to that.

December 1, 2007 at 08:15 in reply to: Will be ever Podium support skinning? #11358

Igr0
Participant

@Zsolt wrote:

I think what sets Podium apart is its sleek and attractive design and looks, which would surely change if skinning was an option.
I do wonder how I could turn off that brushed steel look or where that texture can be found so I could change it. Just to see how that would look, not really a fan of brushed steel 😉

This is the answer 😉

November 24, 2007 at 19:37 in reply to: Something about automation. #11305

Igr0
Participant

Hi Frits, about fixing the automation. Just trying to notice things above this post. 🙄

November 22, 2007 at 05:59 in reply to: Preview: Detached track inspector #11297

Igr0
Participant

It’s better.

November 20, 2007 at 08:18 in reply to: Something about automation. #11286

Igr0
Participant

Bump:)

November 19, 2007 at 11:48 in reply to: 1.95 #11280

Igr0
Participant

Ahh. Sure big thanx to beta testers, especially to *Conquistador*.

November 19, 2007 at 06:24 in reply to: 1.95 #11278

Igr0
Participant

Congratulations!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 40 total)

1 2 3 →