sam c's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 333 total)
  • in reply to: When dragginf fx to track #11303
    sam c
    Participant

    you are right, thanks!

    do you prefer individual tracks for fx?

    in reply to: 1.95 #11274
    sam c
    Participant

    thanks Frist. I am going to start using right now!

    in reply to: Podium & Waves plugins ? #11258
    sam c
    Participant

    above 5.0 i cannot either.

    in reply to: In my opinion #11250
    sam c
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Sorry about this Sam.

    1.95 has turned out to be a mega update. I’ve stopped adding new features, and will now concentrate on testing and bug fixing.

    From an old email from you, I was under the impression that you had been using one of the 1.95 betas which had fixed the bug you refer to. Maybe I misunderstood you.

    I certainly accept and appreciate your apology! I probably should have used the beta but i had a couple of very intense projects and I was concerned so i dealt with the fx bug.

    thanks

    Igr0, no shouting just a little frustrated. i use the fx drag to track feature an incredible amount and it is, well, frustrating to lose the gain and pan each time i do.

    in reply to: When is a shortcircuit in Podium a nice surprise? #11206
    sam c
    Participant

    cool……….thanks!

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11175
    sam c
    Participant

    Frits, i think the tracks losing gain and pan control when you ad an fx is important. i feel it would have been worth an update to correct right away. consider how often we put fx on a track and remove and try again, etc., especially during mixes!

    in reply to: Detachable mixer ? #11116
    sam c
    Participant

    yes. i open a seperate browser window on my first monitor and make the entire monitor track view only.

    on the second monitor i open 2 browser windows for additional views of mixer, tracks, lists, etc.

    in reply to: Phantom copy? #11112
    sam c
    Participant

    thanks acousmod

    in reply to: Phantom copy? #11106
    sam c
    Participant

    is a phantom copy anything different then just a copy?

    when i right click on media, copy, then paste to a new track, is that a phantom copy? this is what i am not sure about, the terminology.

    in reply to: I have mistakenly deleted my audio inputs under devices #11103
    sam c
    Participant

    many thanks!!

    in reply to: I have mistakenly deleted my audio inputs under devices #11100
    sam c
    Participant

    yep, but it didn’t do the trick…..

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11091
    sam c
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Maybe the solution is to add a third track layout option, similar to the compact mode but with fewer track customization options and thus more secure for new users.

    i hope this is not at the cost of engine effeciency or gui clarity?

    trying to resolve each potential issue with another option will be quite consuming?

    sam c
    Participant

    they, at the reaper forum, just finished an extensive summing test that includes Reapr, Podium, Cubase, SAW, Pro Tools, Sonar, and Nuendo. as you would expect, they null out, which means technically there is zero difference in the sound.

    however, this argument is like religion and will likely never go away.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    sam c
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    sam c
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 333 total)
© 2021 Zynewave