swindus's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 187 total)
  • in reply to: Preview 2.04: Pre/post fader and meter improvements #12911
    swindus
    Participant

    @ronin wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    I think this must be a misunderstanding. There is only one fader on the track. Moving the fader position moves the fader (i.e. gain and pan settings) from one track to another track in the chain. There aren’t separate settings for gain and pan on each effect track. Please explain why you would want it to behave differently.

    when you use the expanded mode you can see and set pan and fader for every track side by side in the mixer. now we have the beautiful switch in the fader panel which could let you choose which fader is shown “on top” of the track panel. with this behaviour it would be possible to keep the hierarchic workflow and to set the level independantly for every point in the signal path by switching the fader position. this would leave some more possibilities to the user and personally i think thats the more obvious behaviour…but well…thats just my opinion ^^

    That’s my opinion too and it makes more sense for me, because then it’s possible to change gain and pan between any plugin instances in a chain. Sometimes it’s important to change the gain of a plugin output and not every plugin has a volume/output gain setting.

    Another thing: the current approach, when I understand it correctly, limits the user to one pre OR post fader in the chain. The other method would allow a pre AND post fader for every plugin in the chain.

    But as said just my opinion.

    in reply to: Preview 2.04: Pre/post fader and meter improvements #12905
    swindus
    Participant

    @ronin wrote:

    I guess swindus is talking about the fader handler. say we have an empty track and we add one effect. the small box-switch appears and we can switch between pre/post. the fader handler should now update its position accordingly to the signal path position. example: set pre fader to -10db and post to 0db. if you switch between pre/post the fader(/pan?) doesn’t update.

    Yes, this is what i mean. Just unhide all tracks of a chain in the mixer and move a fader. All faders of all tracks in a chain are linked.

    And a combobox for the font size selection would be nice. Thanks!

    in reply to: Preview 2.04: Pre/post fader and meter improvements #12901
    swindus
    Participant

    Thanks for providing a beta!

    All seems to work as expected but there is one thing that I don’t understand or its a bug. Clicking the little boxes (the left one) for the fader in the new miniature chain view on a mixer strip does not change the fader position when selecting another track in the chain.

    Is it possible to change the font in of the peak hold value to a smaller one?

    I really like the new RMS display and the K Metering, great addition.

    in reply to: 2.00 #12679
    swindus
    Participant

    Thanks for the nice update! 😀

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    swindus
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Hypercyclic standalone and midiyoke #11686
    swindus
    Participant

    You need to create a device mapping for the midi input. Just copy another midi input device and change the midi interface in the device settings dialog.

    Podium does not create a mapping for a new midi device automatically.

    in reply to: Preview: Some UI changes in 1.98 #11645
    swindus
    Participant

    Looks good!

    in reply to: 1.97 #11580
    swindus
    Participant

    Great! Looking forward to it! 😀

    in reply to: Forum für Deutsche User… #11569
    swindus
    Participant

    Soweit ich da informiert bin, ist es nicht möglich mehrere ASIO Geräte gleichzeitig zu nutzen. Außer der Treiber unterstützt es, wie zB der von M-Audio für mehrere im Rechner installierte M-Audio Karten. Der Treiber gaukelt der Audio Software also vor es wäre nur eine Karte installiert.

    in reply to: 1.97 #11562
    swindus
    Participant

    Nice release, thanks!
    Just curious, what are the next new features/improvements on your list Frits?

    in reply to: 1.97 beta: Extended VST support #11528
    swindus
    Participant

    Project file sent.

    in reply to: 1.97 beta: Extended VST support #11526
    swindus
    Participant

    Found another bug:
    – Insert a wav file on a track.
    – Open the wav file in the sound editor and copy a segment from the wav file to the clipboard.
    – Create a new track.
    – Create a new event on the track and open it in the sound editor.
    – Place the edit cursor outside the range of the new event!
    – Paste the clipboard content to the event (Ctrl+V or menu command).
    – Crash.

    Happens only when the edit cursor is not in the range of the event where the audio content is pasted in.

    in reply to: 1.97 beta: Extended VST support #11525
    swindus
    Participant

    Thanks! Looks good now, no crash so far.

    in reply to: Minor suggestion about track height #11524
    swindus
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    I intend to make the track heights pixel fixed, as Mike described.

    This would be great!

    in reply to: 1.97 beta: Extended VST support #11519
    swindus
    Participant

    I did a quick test and beta 4 is still crashing when I delete the last track in the project I sent you if the inspector is hidden.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 187 total)
© 2021 Zynewave