Zynewave@thcilnnahoj wrote:
Works nicely so far!
Thanks for testing.
#1
It appears the settings you chose for the last created snapshot are applied when you create a new snapshot. This causes more problems for me than it does good, though, as it becomes impossible to create snapshots in many cases…I think the simplest solution here would be to allow duplicate snapshots…?
Yes. I think I’ll remove the restriction of creating duplicate snapshots. It was a nice safe-guard for preventing accidental duplicates, but with the new options, it can be confusing.
#2
Clicking an active snapshot deselects it (remember this behaviour was changed for the editor profile bar buttons) – with multiple active snapshots, this can become confusing, I think.
Probably best if this is disabled like on the editor profile bar…Please see the video (with annotations) showing these two things.
Agreed. Something needs to be done about this. The purpose of clicking an active snapshot button to restore previous zoom settings, was to be able to for example select a zoomed out overview, and then click again to return to the last zoomed in view. That benefit will unfortunately become lost.
About default snapshots, it sounds good, but I can only see it working for zoom-only snapshots (which is good enough for me). I don’t see myself copying snapshots between arrangements, though – do you perhaps have an example of a situation for this?
If you have refined a set of vertical/horizontal zoom snapshots, you could then migrate these to other arrangements you are working on. The default snapshots could also include the current (non-snapshot) timeline/vertical zoom settings. New arrangements will then use these as initial settings, instead of the current fixed 4 bar range that you see when you enter the arrangement editor the first time.
ZynewaveI plan to continue working on Podium for many years. I do think that my 20 years of coding represent a significant value, so I don’t intend to release the Podium source code to public domain. I’m not that generous.
ZynewaveThanks for the suggestions. The issue with the automation lanes cluttering the track overview is something I’ll try to improve at some point.
The video you linked to in your first post seems to have been removed.
ZynewaveI have released a beta version with this feature. Please provide feedback in this topic:
Zynewave@chase wrote:
Well – i see Frits did an update… totally cool…
But… didn’t say how much for the source code…. hmmmm?
Sorry, I thought you were joking. Are you an experienced software developer? Are you rich?
Let me know how much you think 20 years of work is worth. 😉
Frits – how does Podium Process sound – Like Cubase or Nuendo or more like Premier?
I ask because the above mentioned plugin comes in two versions –
One for Cubase and Nuendo and one for Premier.So whcih would we use for Poduim? – The one meant for Cubase/Nuendo was my guess…?
Cubase/Nuendo would be my guess too.
Zynewave2.41 is now released, but without the feature discussed in this topic. As mentioned in other topics, I did not have much time for Podium development during the last couple of months. I have now started developing again, but the first few releases will just contain minor stuff and bug fixes. Eventually I’ll get back in the groove. 😉
ZynewaveZynewave@batman42ca wrote:
I figured out why I keep repeating this mistake. Normally, the timeline row is the top row. Once I enable looping or set a punch in point, the timeline row is no longer the top row. I keep forgetting and keep clicking in the top row to set the cursor except sometimes the timeline row is no longer the top row.
The loop, punch and segment rulers auto-hide when they are not active. This is done to maximize the vertical space available for the tracks. You can disable the auto-hiding in the region properties dialog for the three ruler regions.
ZynewavePodium should support up to 32 cores on a 32-bit Windows OS. Haven’t found a PC to test that yet. 😉
Zynewave@thcilnnahoj wrote:
Here’s another thing… I hope I can explain properly.
Concerning making copies of an arrangement – when you create a phantom copy, the sequences are linked in both the old and new arrangement.
A unique copy, on the other hand, converts all sequences to unique copies, meaning there are no phantom sequences at all anymore.I think there’s an option missing to create an exact copy, which has unique sequences (not linked to those in the original arrangement), but retains the relationship of unique and phantom sequences within the arrangement.
Thanks. I’ve now fixed the “New Arrangement as Unique Copy” command so that it properly recreates phantom copies within the arrangement.
Zynewave@Zynewave wrote:
@LiquidProj3ct wrote:
Frits, there is a bug merging audio sequences. The lenght of the last sample is cut down. Try to merge 4 drum samples, placed each one in a beat. In this picture I used an 4/4 signature and a snap value of 1/4
kind regards 😉
I could not reproduce this bug. If you still have the project file, please email it to me, along with the associated drum sample.
Thanks for the file. The bug happens because the sound file is 44.1k and the arrangement is 48k samplerate. As you know, Podium currently does not properly support using sound files of a different samplerate than what you select for the arrangement. Once I implement samplerate conversion and time-stretching, these issues will be fixed.
Zynewave@LiquidProj3ct wrote:
Frits, there is a bug merging audio sequences. The lenght of the last sample is cut down. Try to merge 4 drum samples, placed each one in a beat. In this picture I used an 4/4 signature and a snap value of 1/4
kind regards 😉
I could not reproduce this bug. If you still have the project file, please email it to me, along with the associated drum sample.
ZynewaveZynewave