druidIf the settings were in the graphics card, then that’s where it affects it. Gfx cards these days have their own “filters” also; to affect brightness, contrast, sometimes the colour vibrance, and the colour balance. I sincerely doubt it adjusted your monitor at all; only how your graphics card processes the image before sending it to the monitor.
druidFor that matter, is anyone with issues seeing the image in all circumstances using a CRT monitor? I seem to recall the brightness and contrast on those working a whole lot differently.
druidWhile that may be, if my point stands, then it is darker using IE, than elsewhere.
For that matter, apparently it causes too much eyestrain to use a dark contrast and brightness on a monitor, and while the logo does seem quite dark, if it’s almost entirely black for you, I suggest you perhaps have the wrong monitor/graphics settings for your eyes’ health. And if it’s that way because of not using lights, then it’s also bad for eyes’ healths to not be reading and viewing such as a computer or book in a poorly lit room!
druidHey yeah, I just realised I double-click to create note with the select tool, but I’m not sure I like that method. I like the select tool, but I’d like a shortcut to create a note, like holding down alt and clicking on emptiness, or something.
druidAh the wonders of language differences, and their related character usage. 🙂
druidIE, if I’m correct, STILL has never corrected their .png support bug, where images would be darker than they should be.
That problems I remember was in 5, and I was excited about 6 only for it to still exist. I have no reason to believe that they’ve fixed it, although I can’t imagine why they would want .png files to not load correctly. I may be wrong about current versions however, I stopped using IE since long ago.
Still, if I’m right, it means any program that uses MS’s built-in IE functions to view .png files probably will also be dark. Or at least, views them in a way like a webpage, like in help viewer etc. That may or may not explain all the problems, but should at least explain one of them if not more.
druidI know there are plenty of people who don’t like to use the keyboard, but I just press the delete button on my keyboard. :-s
druidYes, much better I feel! Thank you for your hard work.
druiddruidHm interesting. I think that people probably think of a clip as everything between those points, but *inclusive*, meaning right on the dot of the end perimeter as well.
So I think including points on the 2nd bar should occur, but I can understand why you didn’t do that. The logic is, that event is only as long as just before bar 2, but I think most people think of event lengths as inclusive of their boundaries as well.
I won’t mind either way though, I think.
druid.. I am so terribly sorry, I got it the wrong way around. Thank you for correcting me. 🙁
druidIf you mean a host that supports rewire, then yes. But I don’t believe it can actually host rewire connections, only slave to them.
[edit]
Please ignore this post, I have got it the wrong way around and stupidly posted. 😳
druidIf I understand correctly, you’re saying clicking on the mixer only gives the “source” section of the full list?
I’ve never really cared, but if I think about it, to me it makes sense to narrow a menu down when clicking on something specific; but perhaps LP has a good suggestion, left clicking on it in the sequencer view would open like in the mixer view, but right click the full. Otherwise, now that I’ve thought about it, that option or I think I’d prefer clicking on it and only getting the source menu. If I wanted properties for everything, I’d click a more general area. I’m pretty sure other programs do that too; focus menus in specific areas but if right clicked in general areas (like on headings and such) give the full menu.
Still, I don’t greatly care either way! Would only be a minor convenience to me.
druidI believe I also recall Cubase being able to understand units from VST plugins. I don’t think it’s impossible. And I’d kind of like it, but I’m ok with it at the moment. I WOULD like to be able to enter exact values however, a nd if it’s not going to be exactly what’s inside the plugin, then I’d like at least three decimals of resolution!
druidCan’t really test, but at least I tried it and I like the balance between separate events and a continuous envelope. This is how I wished it would work (from what I can tell so far)! Thank you!