Igr0's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • in reply to: In my opinion #11242
    Igr0
    Participant

    @sam c wrote:

    we have waited far too long for a bug fix!!!

    bye

    Why are you shouting here? You see how long to take an update from Steinberg, for example? 3-4 months. And there is a big team. Frits works alone. We all want, that graphical update would be done so, that never come back to this problem anymore.It’s good for us and Frits too. Just wait a little bit more, and you will get what you want. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11239
    Igr0
    Participant

    Beta 16. Not Bug, but not right too:

    When i brows the track menu and get ” presets “, the presets menu window appears over all the next items on this track menu.So i was unable to see others lines of this track menu items.

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11237
    Igr0
    Participant

    The most of all i like in 1.95 version, i don’t need to use track inspector anymore. More space now…

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11204
    Igr0
    Participant

    It’s very nice now! I like it! Really good work Fritz.

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11181
    Igr0
    Participant

    I have strange bug with all 1.95 betas.It happens when i create new arrangement, which have 4 audio tracks and all things by default.So, i have 4 tracks. Then i delete last track(using delete bottom), then next track and so on.But when i delete last track podium crashes. Sorry for my english ๐Ÿ˜ณ

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11179
    Igr0
    Participant

    @Conquistador wrote:

    @Zynewave wrote:

    how does the Mixer look now? Are you making these changes there as well or leaving it as is?

    I’m not changing the mixer this time around.

    Ok cool. ๐Ÿ™‚

    On another note, do you have any sort of time frame for a release of 1.95?

    It has been more than 8 weeks and AFAICT there are some bug fixes that are in 1.95. While I am happy to keep going with the beta’s as it is quite fun to see the evolution of Podium in this way, perhaps if possible it would be better now to return to more regular releases as that means any fixes are released quickly as well and not potentially held up by new features being added over a longer than normal period.

    Also new users are unlikely to buy Podium just to beta test it, so the influx of new users has no doubt slowed down as a result of the length of this beta although I can see that the lengthy time frame was most likely totally unavoidable this time as you have always stuck to a structured, consistent and much shorter release schedule over the years.

    I am so used to Podium’s nice and steady release schedule of 2 – 4 weeks sometimes even sooner. Never too hurried or too long. Just right.

    Of course 1.95 is a very special case indeed and I want you to feel totally happy before releasing it (as others do no doubt), but even if there was any last minute problems you could release a quick fix for that. You have done that before. Therefore, I see no problem with that.

    It just means we can access a recent version ready to go (roughly every 2 – 4 weeks as before) with fixes instead of maybe having things stretch for a month or two months, as is the case now. This is a very long time indeed for a Podium release.

    It is very odd in a way considering it has never been like this. Of course 1.95’s development process has seen many major changes to say the least, I guess I am just eager to move on now to other more pressing areas in Podium…like auto mapping, time stretching and even Rewire. I know many are waiting for Rewire to compensate for features that Podium does not have yet and ease Podium into their existing set ups.

    I know you have given rough time scales for these in the past of course but I am just curious as to when we can return to the usual 2 – 4 weeks release period for Podium ๐Ÿ™‚

    Conquistador, Why you trying to rush Fritz for 1.95 release? Is it so important?(numbers) I understand if we haven’t this betas. But we have them, and can work farther with projects. Or i missed something? ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11089
    Igr0
    Participant

    [/quote]
    Maybe the solution is to add a third track layout option, similar to the compact mode but with fewer track customization options and thus more secure for new users.[/quote]

    Yeah…:)

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11081
    Igr0
    Participant

    Why do you want to hide the master track?

    I do it to keep some place since it has no use for me until the final bounce.[/quote]

    Right!

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #11067
    Igr0
    Participant

    One question – How to hide master track from tracks view.(but all other tracks must stay visible)

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #10993
    Igr0
    Participant

    Frits, you can do a competition here in this forum. Competition about interface concepts, ideas. Best idea will be implemented in Podium 2.;) This competition gives only pluses and more users in future.

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #10992
    Igr0
    Participant

    During this week i will email you some of my idea (concepts) about track view. You cannot see it in another hosts, but it will be clear and comfort. Maybe it will be in podium 2 interface btw. ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #10991
    Igr0
    Participant

    Hi, Frits. Iยดm really confused by the developing interface. I think, that you haven’t chosen the easiest way to create clear and comfort interface, and thats why many peoples don’t want to take podium as main DAW. I think, that there is no reason to create new system of interface, cause easiest system already done by another host developers. Sorry for that, its just my opinion. Regards.

    P.S.: Why inspector contain( it just copied) the same info, as in tracks.Double vision?

    in reply to: Double click opens plugin window #10955
    Igr0
    Participant

    We all!

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Igr0
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Something about automation. #10927
    Igr0
    Participant

    Thnx, Frits!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
ยฉ 2021 Zynewave