koolkeys@Zynewave wrote:
@koolkeys wrote:
So will bouncing the composite track get rid of the take tracks? If you have a long song and four or five takes, after bouncing the composite track, will the RAM be freed that all the takes are using?
Bouncing will not get rid of the take tracks. If you are sure you don’t need to do further edits to the takes, you can simply delete the take tracks. You can also move the bounced sound to a new track, and delete the entire composite track group.
Well yes, but I’m LAZY!!! 😉 😆
koolkeysCool. So will bouncing the composite track get rid of the take tracks? If you have a long song and four or five takes, after bouncing the composite track, will the RAM be freed that all the takes are using?
Brent
koolkeysI think this is a great addition. A question and a feature request.
First, it sounds like there won’t be any direct access to the take clips, but you have to select them and splice them using the comp track only? Can you expand a bit on how you would select parts of each take to composite?
Next, I think it would be great to have a seperate button or option to bounce your composite track to a single “normal” track. In other words, a way to quickly compile the composites you’ve done into one tidy track. Or will bouncing the composite track automatically do this?
Does any of this make sense? I’ve been sick all day and may not be thinking straight.
Brent
koolkeysI, for one, REALLY like this idea. Although it may cause confusion, if there was a good WIKI section added for it or something it would be fine. I do like the old method as well. So we can use both methods still?
Now, where is that beta!
Brent
koolkeyskoolkeysI prefer number 2. I actually like the small balls on the sends, but if you want consistency, then I pick number 2. I do NOT like number 3 because I don’t like my level meters on a separate plane than the actual level meters area.
Brent
koolkeysThat’s great news Fritz! I don’t use Rewire much, but this is quite a big milestone to get out of the way.
Thanks!
Brent
koolkeysI think it’s time to move on. The pros seriously outweigh the cons. Personally, I’m on both XP and Vista now and both are pretty stable(except ASIO4ALL on Vista, grrrrrr). But there just comes a time when you’ve got to let go of the old systems. If it means better workflow, better performance, and more time spent coding needed features and fixes(as opposed to supporting too many systems), I’m all for it.
Brent
koolkeyskoolkeys@anzoid wrote:
Had to write…
After reading Koolkeys’ recent post over at KVR I downloaded the Podium 1.98 Demo just to have a look.Podium is just what I’ve been looking for! The way it works – the hierarchical structure clicked first time. Beautiful.
A read through of the manual and a go through Podianer’s excellent tutorial videos and I’m up and running.At last a host that brings a smile to the face and is a pleasure to use.
As someone else wrote in the forum “the cheque’s in the post”.
Very happy to be a paid up member of the Podium community and very impressed by what I see here – particularly the support by the developer and other members of the forum.
Glad to have you! And also glad to have helped!
Brent
koolkeysWhich programs are those?
Brent
koolkeysI don’t know of any software that starts with the engine off. I would say that keeping your monitors down when turning it on would be the better option. It would be more annoying to most people to have to turn it on every time.
Brent
koolkeyskoolkeyskoolkeys