LiquidProj3ct's Forum Page

@Zynewave wrote:

My screenshot was using the “compact strips” option, so that is why the meter widths are not as wide as usual. The meters will be the same width as in previous Podium releases, and in fact I plan to remove the “compact strips” option once I implement strip width zooming.

Anyway, even with normal strips, I think they’re very thin, that’s the reason I suggest a semitransparent slider. Just an opinion.

Another ‘taste’ opinion. I don’t find very appealing the fact that when you have the cursor over any Podium control is highlighted. Any chance to remove this feature or do it switchable?

As you can see for me the ‘solidity feeling’ when I do music is very important 😀

Thanks Frits, it seems nice… and thanks by full colour the mixer tracks! 😀

I think you must round the right side of mute buttons [X] also, since they will give more empty space between mixer strips.

I am undecided whether the slider knobs in the mixer (and rack and track headers) should assume the color of the background, or if they should be the default button color. What would you prefer?

I’d prefer see them with default button color, the same for pan slider, and maybe also BSMR buttons (tracks & mixer).

Best regards!

@kingtubby wrote:

I can’t see anything in the registry, and the .ini files are stored in:

C:Users…AppDataRoamingZynewavePodium

Mart.

You’re right 🙂 then, would be possible that Podium look for these files in the Podium.exe folder?

@Zynewave wrote:

Calling it “Rack” will of course make more sense once I implement the embedded plugin editors.

I’m very excited about that! In general I’m very pleased with last changes, really 😀

@Zynewave wrote:

I’m guessing I need a couple of weeks to update the mixer to the new chain design. I wonder if I should delay the release of 2.23 so that it includes the changes to the mixer?

I would say ‘yes’ because, for me, the consistency is something very important.

Thanks!

Thanks Conquistador!

However I found so easy and so quick current Inspector behaviour that I don’t miss that feature, although I respect your desire 🙂 Maybe you see it in another way that I cannot see that would rocket your workflow.

Best regards!

@Zynewave wrote:

It’s impossible for the host to split up the processing of a single plugin, or even a chain of serially connected plugins

Ok! the other sentences after that, except the part of Kontakt, are too complex to understand for my poor brain a sunday after *the last saturday drink*. I’m sure that it’s always the last drink that makes me feel ill!! 😛

Since beta1 this has improved a lot! thanks!

Would be possible hide the Input slot in tracks header? I use inputs in my works rarely and for me is a wasted space

edit: if you modify track settings, please add a “Max height” for them, I find uncomfortable the automatic resizing of tracks when I hide the mixer/editor… because if I hide them is to be able to see more tracks 😉