Zynewave's Forum Page

Got the file. I see that you have recorded the sustain as a series of parameter events. Try enabling the “record as curve sequence on separate track” option in the parameter properties dialog, delete the existing sustain parameter track and redo the recording. Let me know if you can get sustain to work this way.

Hi Mark,

if I want to keep multiple takes and then mix and match later, can I do that without just making tons of tracks?

I assume that you are referring to the fact that loop-recording creates a new track for each loop. There is no other way to make the multiple takes appear as one track. You can collapse the track group with the multiple takes if the problem is that the tracks take up too much space in the editor.

Frits

Nice, did you create the entry?

I can confirm that the so far single line of information is correct. 😆

@Conquistador:

It seems you misunderstood me. To try to make it clearer, here’s a screenshot of a track configured both for level automation and audio mixing (which is a setup that I’m not recommending because it is of little practical use):

The fader requires more pixels than the width of the dB labels, even when the fader overlaps the labels. On top of that, one of my design criteria is that the level meters are centered on the strip, which results in some wasted space to the right of the meters.

I defintely want the faders next to the meters. As for the strips being to wide…I don’t understand why you said this.????

Try setting up a normal automation track with the mixer level parameter. Now “enable audio mixing” in the automation track properties. This will show you what I mean with wider. Btw. this possibility of assigning a track both for audio mixing and automation is not something I recommend. I may remove this feature at some point.

would we be able to get an ‘open with external editor’ box for sound events?

I’ll think about it.