Zynewave's Forum Page
Forum Replies Created
-
ZynewaveKeymasterOn my notepad I have scribbled down a possible crash-bug in the bouncing, which I haven’t fixed yet. I think I found that it could occur if you tried to bounce record a MIDI channel mapping (no audio) of a global plugin. Maybe this can explain your crashes.
ZynewaveKeymaster@darcyb62 wrote:
When deleting a parent track, it would be nice if the child track(s) slid back to the left to fill in the gap left by the parent…
This will be implemented as part of the new track template feature:
http://www.zynewave.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=981ZynewaveKeymasterI’ll put in some code that will make sure a window is visible on the current desktop area.
ZynewaveKeymasterThe editor profiles do not store any information specific to individual arrangements. If it should work the way you suggest, then the way profiles are stored in setup files will need to be changed. This is a big task so it won’t happen anytime soon.
ZynewaveKeymasterIs this possible Frits?
Yes. Like you, I prefer to keep the lists in the track inspector simple. If you could drag reorder mappings like you can on the start page, then I think there will be numerous occasions where you accidentally mess up the order when you drag objects from the list to the tracks. But having an option in the editor profile for “Enable device object organization in inspector lists” would be the way to make all happy. Not for a while though. I’m just doing what is needed to get rid of the project wizard, and then it’s back to audio features.
ZynewaveKeymasterWhy is there no shortcut for “new browser window”? Or have I overseen this?
Originally I thought the browser window was not something you would want to open/close frequently, unlike the list window. Ctrl+B is taken, so maybe when I have removed the project wizard window, Ctrl+W could be used for the broWser window?
ZynewaveKeymaster@acousmod wrote:
The “tracks region properties” in the editor profile.
Oh, weird…
I thought that it will be a track option basis, not a global option for the whole profile.
In this case, I wonder if it is really interesting…Could it be a track option in the future ?
Well, I apparently have misunderstood your feature request:
http://www.zynewave.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=942I thought your main problem was that all the track meters was taking up too much space when you resized the track header width. Do you really want to select show/hide meter for each individual track? If I had implemented this, your next request would probably be if this could be a global option too? 😉
ZynewaveKeymasterYou need to use two busses for this. First bus configured with a 6-channel send, and 3 stereo returns (each return configured as stereo with channel offsets of 1, 3 and 5). Second bus configured with 3 stereo sends, and a 6-channel return.
ZynewaveKeymasterI have not found it in the Track properties ??
The “tracks region properties” in the editor profile.
ZynewaveKeymaster- Extended the project start page with new menus.
ZynewaveKeymasterSo let me get this right… The only way to turn a mono track into a stereo track is to run it through a stereo effect.
More precisely; to run it through a stereo mapping. If you have no effects on your tracks, then the closest parent mapping is the master output, and if this is stereo, then you can pan each audio track.
ZynewaveKeymasterAs it sits I can’t do it.
By that, I assume that you are using a mono effect on the group track? The pan dial is hidden in this case, because there is no point in panning the signals when they are going to be summed into mono on the group track. You need to use a stereo effect if you want to pan the signal before applying the effect.
ZynewaveKeymasterThe pan dial is on the track only if the parent track is stereo. If you e.g. have a mono effect mapping on the parent track, the pan dial is not shown.
ZynewaveKeymasterAnd it is written beneath : do not post until fades / volume / groups are done !
😆
ZynewaveKeymasterTorben has sent me a short reply:
“The name is only defined in one place and is used for various things, such as copy protection, so therefore it is the same for all three variants”.