jpleong's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 87 total)
  • in reply to: Preview: Compact track layout #10824
    jpleong
    Participant

    I’m also running 1680×1050 native on a laptop.

    JP

    in reply to: Global fader movement. #10786
    jpleong
    Participant

    From the Sweetwater website:
    “VCA Group
    A feature found on many high end live mixing boards. A VCA group provides the same type of control over signal levels that a mute group provides for muting. Basically, VCA groups allow the sound engineer to control the volumes of several independent sources through one control fader without having to route them all through a common subgroup. It is called a VCA group because Voltage Controlled Amplifiers are used. In fact every controllable channel in the desk has its volume controlled by a VCA (as opposed to audio passing through a resistive fader) in order for this to work. Some more modern (and expensive) designs have employed a motorized fader scheme (also known as Moving Fader), but these sometimes aren’t referred to as VCA groups since there may no longer VCA’s involved (see the Technical Tip of the Day from 04/09/2002 for more background on that).”

    Since VCA, on a console, controls the fader and not the audio, things like post-Fade Auxes and Buss sends are affected proportionally as well. So, for example, as the level decreases so does its reverb send.

    I think that Frits should take advantage of software and take the concept one step further and make the VCA function linkable to any other parameter on any other channel. These parameters could be setup to match the movement, move proportionally, or move completely opposite each other. With this, you can achieve stuff like switching between two takes very easily or activating an effect on another channel when the guitar is pulled down in the mix.

    Good (original) suggestion, Blackstar! I hope you don’t mind if I steal it 🙂

    JP

    in reply to: Global fader movement. #10784
    jpleong
    Participant

    Convince me -what would this accomplish that Grouping doesn’t already accomplish? Are you looking to do VCA-ish adjustments?

    JP

    in reply to: Auto Device mapping problems #10744
    jpleong
    Participant

    Add my voice, I suppose. Though, the auto-interface routing/naming issue is a bigger thing for me -since I use different devices depending on my location (home/office/mobile).

    JP

    in reply to: Auto-Save plus visual confirmation. #10742
    jpleong
    Participant

    I always do ctrl+shift+alt+s to make sure everything gets saved.

    JP

    jpleong
    Participant

    I am a CM “convert.” I have been doing income earning work on Podium for the past few months.

    JP

    in reply to: Crash after long rendered bounce #10659
    jpleong
    Participant

    Not that I really know how to help you, but… what are you trying to render, how many tracks, how many VSTs?

    JP

    in reply to: Preview: Big transport #10647
    jpleong
    Participant

    silly Americans, always demanding to have it their way. 😉

    I only asked because it confused me on occasion (my Saab’s digital mileage markers are the same way). I don’t mean to force European users to have to adopt the American system -if we could specify location/region within Podium? No big deal if it’s more trouble than it’s worth.

    JP

    in reply to: Preview: Big transport #10639
    jpleong
    Participant

    This will be a welcome addition! Any chance on allowing a customization for U.S. nomenclature (our . are your ,)?

    JP

    in reply to: Frits, can you check out Nebula 2? #10624
    jpleong
    Participant

    Oh, the issue in question is the Drum n Bass issue, since I just remembered that the UK issue is a month ahead of the US.

    JP

    in reply to: Frits, can you check out Nebula 2? #10621
    jpleong
    Participant

    Sam, I was about to suggest trying Nebula 3 CM. It seems the most recent issue of CM magazine has an updated version with improved CPU handling (no more Hybrid/Core+ silliness -it’s been replaced by the confusing econo/normal).

    JP

    in reply to: Podium 2.0 #10613
    jpleong
    Participant

    Hey Frits, what kind of interfaces and setups do you test with?

    And I’ll add my voice for re-Wire support.

    JP

    in reply to: Podium 2.0 #10593
    jpleong
    Participant

    A tip: If you don’t do any editing after setting the level to “off”, you can press undo to return the level to the previous value.

    Thanks, I’ll try this. Any further thoughts on mute automation? As I get deeper and deeper into my latest project, I’m finding that I’m going to need it more and more (these young folks just don’t seem to have perfect pitch anymore :-)).

    JP

    PS- another suggestion for Podium 2.0 -> Would it be possible to have a Zynewave plug-in called zStrip? A combination of the zEQ and some (decent) compressor/dynamics processor? If I can cut down on total numbers of group tracks I have to make, that’d be great. Of course, I suppose the zGrid would help alleviate this problem.

    in reply to: Podium 2.0 #10586
    jpleong
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    So, given that a single track and the bus return section is soloed, what you want to achieve can be done by turning the gain dial to “off” on the bus send track?

    I just tried this and it works. My only two issues are 1) what you describe in the question below and 2) the act of turning those gain dials to off -especially if they’ve already been adjusted to some level (got to remember where I set them or make yet another group track).

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Would there be a need to solo just a bus return, i.e. to hear the bus return for ALL tracks with their dry signal muted?

    Yes. If I have a lot of things going to the same reverb, delay, chorus, etc… you get the picture. Then there’s always the fun listening-to-multiple-returns at the same time to see how they mix together.

    JP

    ps –

    I’ve thought about implementing automatic soloing of bus return tracks

    Oh, and don’t do this -it would drive me crazy. If you setup a song via template, for example, and there’s already a verb on a voice -soloing it to work on EQ would be difficult if the reverb return automatically soloed with it. Does that make sense? If I want to hear the return with the dry, I’ll just solo the return as well.

    in reply to: Podium 2.0 #10584
    jpleong
    Participant

    I actually need to hear just the return. Soloing both would, obviously, mask the sound. This is important when doing a lot of effects processing (especially perfecting reverb timbre and parallel compression) not to mention trying to troubleshoot a bad mix (“Where’s that tinny sound coming from?”).

    Having Mute automation is just easier to do. Simply clicking On/Off is much simpler and quicker, to me, than having to draw a line or grab a fader and push/pull. It’s even more important when you’ve already done some level automation on the track and/or you need to bring the track back up (ie, track dedicated to verses + track dedicated to chorus) as switching states (on/off) is a two click affair while level automation is more a four click affair (point A 100% -> 0% followed by point B 0%->100%).

    I’m also kind of a neat freak, so if the curve/line doesn’t “look” right, I am compelled to go back and re-draw. Mute automation would just make me “seem” all the more sane.

    Hey, Frits, thanks for all your input/output/thoughts/insight. I think your approach to customer service is the best of any company I’ve ever worked with. Now, if you wouldn’t mind going over to TC and get them to fix the issues with the Konnekt 24D I’d be using Podium with the biggest grin ever.

    JP

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 87 total)
© 2021 Zynewave