H-man's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 298 total)
  • in reply to: Attention Poise users – new skin! #17344
    H-man
    Participant

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    Uhh, self-ban maybe… 🙂
    I haven’t used my account there for over a year, and can’t remember my password. Different e-mail address, too… 🙄
    I could probably get a second account or ask a moderator for help, but I don’t think I’ll bother, as I never particularly liked the place anyway.

    hahahahah ….to quote that guy in the editing room from the movie Boogie Nights “It is what it is!”.

    The new skin is fantastic, great (and a lot of) work.

    It’s interesting that Shannon went with such a basic skin for what amounts to a very cool little instrument/sampler. The library of available skins is now probably larger than for any other VST/VSTi.

    This is definitely a new favorite tho.

    Ben

    in reply to: Preview 2.25: Zoom snapshots & revised track height zoom #17308
    H-man
    Participant

    Love it 😀

    Frits, you’ve just conquered the tyranny of lengthly arrangements.

    (only nine snapshots :P)

    in reply to: Composite midi tracks? #17279
    H-man
    Participant

    @Malcolm Jacobson wrote:

    I would like to see support for composite MIDI tracks added at some stage.

    +1

    The composite track feature for recording audio is really strong now. It would be great to have these tools for recording MIDI as well. Those 280 bar keyboard jams are fun but editing-down is a bit of nightmare 😉

    in reply to: Anyone else using BCF2000 Mackie mode for Podium ? #17266
    H-man
    Participant

    Sorry Swayzak, but I can help only so far as letting you know that mine works fine 😕

    I use XP for my DAW also and have used the built-in drivers for the BCF2000. For what it’s worth, I did encounter a conflict between my Akai MPD32 and some Logitec webcam drivers a while back 🙄

    If you would like to set up some specific tests I happy to help out.

    Ben

    edit: I am testing on 2.24

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17265
    H-man
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    @H-man wrote:

    At the risk of sounding like a broken record, would this be a good time to add the option of different colours (ie. lighter colours for darker themems) for the markers on the level meters?

    Are you talking about the dark 0, -3, -6, -12 dB indicator lines within the meter? If so, would the solution be to use the configured text color instead of black to highlight the lines?

    Yep, they’re the ones.

    That would work well 🙂 as the panel and text colours would always be in contrast to each other, thanks.

    in reply to: 2.24 #17264
    H-man
    Participant

    Huge update. Thanks Frits. 😀

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17205
    H-man
    Participant

    Happy New Year Frits.

    Nice work on the enhancements to the colour options. It’s fun and looks good (or terrible depending on the colours one chooses :P)

    At the risk of sounding like a broken record, would this be a good time to add the option of different colours (ie. lighter colours for darker themems) for the markers on the level meters?

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17159
    H-man
    Participant

    Yeah …put your feet up Frits, you deserve it after an amazing year of refinements and upgrades to Podium.

    Merry Christmas all 😀

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17110
    H-man
    Participant

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    Question: Since the selected embedded parameters remain the same across different arrangements, I assume they stored within the project (or the device definitions) then. If so, would it be possible (without too much trouble on your end) to export such a parameter list setup to reuse in other projects?

    I’m assuming that you’re talking about existing projects that use the same plugins.

    As far as I can see from limited testing, the state of the embedded editors is saved as part of a track/effect chain templeate 8).

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17059
    H-man
    Participant

    Is there any reason that the mixer right-click menu does not also have “Remove all Parameters”?

    Given that the mixer and rack are treated separately, I think it would make sense to have this option here as well.

    Has anyone found a plugin with more parameters than Guitar Rig 3 😯

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17018
    H-man
    Participant

    @H-man wrote:

    Also, setting a minimum strip width in the mixer seems to disable the Collapse button (in the mixer only).

    Okay scratch that. I had the “Expand all groups” option ticked on the mixer drop down menu…

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17005
    H-man
    Participant

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    Any kind of resizing (mixer, inspector, etc.) is extremely sluggish here when even just one embedded parameter is shown in the mixer.

    I hate to stir things up but mine has become much better :-s and I have not updated drivers etc.

    in reply to: Preview 2.24: Embedded plugin editors in the rack #17004
    H-man
    Participant

    Frits,

    I have noticed that while multiple automation tracks can be viewed in the mixer, the rack (inspector) only shows the active one.

    Is this on purpose? :-k

    Also, setting a minimum strip width in the mixer seems to disable the Collapse button (in the mixer only).

    in reply to: 2.23 #16995
    H-man
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    thx H-man, i was figuring that, but in the zPEQ and zPitch help I could find anything 🙂

    Cool. For confirmation you can check (Right-click) the Device properties of these versions of the plug-in 🙂

    There was a thread not all that long ago [citation needed 😛 ]about the addition of multi-channel audio.

    in reply to: 2.23 #16993
    H-man
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Question, what does mean 5.0, 5.1 and 7.1 tags? I see them in zPEQ and zPitch

    Surround sound? 😉

    Edit: Try this for an overview:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surround_sound

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 298 total)
© 2021 Zynewave