druid's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 388 total)
  • in reply to: 2.20 #16137
    druid
    Participant

    Hey guys, when I first loaded Podium 2.20 I noticed that double-clicking on the arrangement took aaaages to load.

    Then I tried a couple of other projects and it was shorter.

    I realised I’d loaded the default setup, and that’s what made the difference for me. I’m not sure who does it this way anymore, but I don’t let Podium activate the arrangement as soon as I open it; but when I loaded the default setup, it switched it back on, and that’s why it took so long for me.

    Otherwise it seems ok on mine; but I’m on a Core 2 Duo 7200 or something mobile processor, so it should be fairly snappy anyway.

    I also noticed, before I loaded the default setup, that some of my settings vanished anyway, like my VST folder! So I had to load all projects and search missing plugins (after adding the folder back in) and resave them all. Kind of annoying.

    All in all though, now that I’ve had a look at the new layout, I somewhat like it. I thought I wouldn’t like not having the mixer and editor in the same window, but as it turns out, I was confused about what was meant; I never use the inline editor anyway! So it’s even better for me, now! Heh.

    in reply to: 2.20 #16125
    druid
    Participant

    I have to say; the video actually opened my eyes a little about what I could do with setting Podium up. I’ve always found the depth of setup just a little too much for what I was prepared for, but looking at it now, it looks simpler than what I first thought.

    It also highlights the new setup quite well. I like this; often I’m scared of UI changes when I read about them, because I really don’t understand what it all means. Showing me makes it so much easier.

    I also have to say, though, that it’s somewhat frustrating to make a few UI settings adjustments, and then when I want to load the default to get the new features, but want my little settings still set, I must set them each time. I’m not sure how, but I feel like there should be a way to have loading default setups not replace absolutely everything, or a way to load the newest default setup, what changed from the last one, so that other adjustments are not altered from user settings.

    in reply to: Preview 2.20: Various UI improvements #16103
    druid
    Participant

    Markus, whether you like it or not, paying someone some donations, then asking for some things, then getting angry when they don’t do them, looks very much like paying to get service. That’s not the service Frits offered, as far as I can tell. You’re being incredibly rude in the way you respond, and incredibly offensive in the way you expect to be heard and demanding attention. Language barrier or not (and in this case, not, because it’s emotions, not just slight word differences), there are boundaries beyond which it is rude and arrogant to act, and you have crossed them a few times now, especially with your most recent outburst.

    I am sympathetic with you for not getting much response to what you like; that’s a bummer, but no one gave you a RIGHT to say how things should be. Frits might put some people’s suggestions in because they match what he wants for Podium, or it might be a reasonable compromise. Not all suggestions are equal in terms of what relevance they have to the update that Frits is planning.

    You say the customer is always right, but the customer is not always right. And what companies bow and put any customer’s suggestions in? Cubase, Sonarand ProTools? No they don’t. If they did, they’d put a feature in one time, take it out the next, and god knows what after, because people want different things. No company does whatever the customer says. What good ones DO do is, have a vision, a goal, or idea of what to do, and take feedback from users, and use that feedback to further what they chose to do. That’s what Frits is doing, and mostly doing it quite well. Your demands (because they aren’t suggestions, they are demands, or you wouldn’t be angry when they aren’t done) are not customer being right, but customer trying to dominate.

    Naturally, I can only speak for my own opinions, and I might be wrong about what Frits thinks and/or does, but I think I have the general gist of it correct.

    I’m sorry everyone, but I had to have my say here (wrong thread, I know, but this thread was where the posts I’m referring to occurred). I have been feeling highly offended by some of Markus’ posts since he arrived; I don’t want you to go Markus, but I would greatly appreciate you keeping your tone civil and pleasant. I am by no means a forum administrator, of course, but it grates on my nerves when a person is unreasonably angry over something for no good reason.

    in reply to: C# vs C++ #16018
    druid
    Participant

    C# might be easier, but if you plan coding a fair amount, I can’t help but feel that C++ will do you better in the long run, and should perform a little better (some argue however that with today’s computers, the speed difference is ignorable if not negligible).

    in reply to: Plugin rescanning #15993
    druid
    Participant

    I don’t know if it will help, but I found when I let it scan my entire VST folder (split into a few subgroups and then subsubgroups) it would crash, and so I, instead of scanning entire folder, got a new project, didn’t scan, and then manually told it to import VSTs from select folders. I found that I could import them all; I have no idea why it crashed when it does them all at once, but you might try this, if you have them grouped in folders. I assume you do, since you said you reorganised them.

    in reply to: Podium+IK Multimedia & Tone2 crashes #15971
    druid
    Participant

    Holy frilolie… That’s in two thousand and EIGHT!!! Whoops! I just assumed the year would be the same; some nice support there! *sigh*

    in reply to: Podium+IK Multimedia & Tone2 crashes #15957
    druid
    Participant

    Send another one. Almost two months? Too long. 😛

    in reply to: Linux port? #15646
    druid
    Participant

    @koolkeys wrote:

    I think most threats can be avoided with smart browsing.

    This is so very important I shouldn’t even need to quote it, but for some reason I do. There are still so many people who just aren’t smart when it comes to it; because the internet is a bonanza of multiple junkets and surely it’s all trustworthy! 🙂

    in reply to: .. #15571
    druid
    Participant

    Yes, well, I wasn’t going to go into ALL the details… It taught me something though! 🙂

    in reply to: 2.18 – problem with fxpansion guru #15562
    druid
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    I will be disabling the UAC option in future builds of Podium. I found that when I rescanned my plugins with Podium 2.18, the Drumatic 3 plugin popped up module creation errors. Drumatic 3 is a SynthEdit plugin, and it will save some .sem module files in the plugin folder when it is being initialized. I don’t why SynthEdit is designed this way, but a lot of SynthEdit plugins do this.

    On the one hand, I don’t think it’s wisebecause Windows is only likely to continue this trend (in my opinion), in order to make things more secure.

    On the other, why on earth SynthEdit modules save external files, I have no idea. That has always annoyed the hell out of me. I use a fair amount of SE plugs (grudgingly) so this becoming a problem would er … become a problem. 😛

    in reply to: .. #15561
    druid
    Participant

    @thcilnnahoj wrote:

    With the Fish Fillets, CPU use goes up drastically also.

    I could be way off (since I can’t remember if they have this “problem” or not), but could it be denormals? Does it only happen during silence on the one track?

    in reply to: .. #15560
    druid
    Participant

    @moikkelis wrote:

    If i support him, it is fair enough to ask ONE wanted feature, isn’t?

    It is fair to ask many things! But you shouldn’t expect even one feature that you ask for to be implemented. You paid for the licence to use Podium as it is now and as it is for a year (assuming you purchased under the current licencing scheme) the way the developer creates it, taking feedback from users. There are no promises that everyone can definitely have one thing included, or anything like that. So far I haven’t seen Frits say such things, and I’m glad, because it’s politically good, and also wise, because then it helps users understand that they can make suggestions, but not control.

    As I’ve learned in the past (sigh), a person should not rely on how something is going to be in the future. Rather, they should accept what something is now, work with that if it suits them, and hope for future improvements but never expect them (unless it is promised or close to that). Otherwise, they will continue to be disappointed.

    in reply to: Preview 2.18: New compiler and x64 test version #15474
    druid
    Participant

    32-bit Podium 2.18 seems to be working fine. I only really have loaded projects I have and played them, see if they load. Don’t really know what else to do, and I’m not in full swing of production since a while ago so I don’t test things much, but at least on the surface, it seems fine.

    in reply to: New song in progress #15444
    druid
    Participant

    I feel bad :(. I listened but didn’t comment, because I honestly didn’t know what to say. I liked some of the sound of it, not entirely my thing but it sounded nice, but I had no real constructive feedback, and I didn’t listen for frequency ranges or anything either. But it did sound nice. Wait I already said that. 😳

    in reply to: Audio-stretching suggestions! #15432
    druid
    Participant

    Weeelllll…. I don’t know. 😛 So are the algorithms that allow markers in audio (in order to stretch sections of the audio file differently) only good for rough estimates, or can they be production quality?

    I’m not familiar with the algorithms out there, nor the practicality and quality of them, so I can’t really comment further…

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 388 total)
© 2021 Zynewave