Levendis's Forum Page

Profile  |  Topics  |  Replies  |  Favorites

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 300 total)
  • in reply to: Preview 2.36: Extended UI and mixer resizing. #19262
    Levendis
    Participant

    beta6 works great! 🙂

    in reply to: The Podium Music Lounge #19248
    Levendis
    Participant

    F*#!KING AWESOME TRACKS!!!
    @xis23 wrote:

    http://www.xis23.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Done.mp3

    …Dance floor bread and butter with sprinkles. After bopping along I genuflex in your direction sir.
    @xis23 wrote:

    …and a work in progress: http://www.xis23.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/lob2.mp3

    …Walkman heaven. As funky-tight as Squarepusher.

    Do you have a SoundCloud page? Loved the slippery wet distortion to your sound, it’s masterful. 😛
    @xis23 wrote:

    … can’t wait for pitching and time stretching! Will be able to banish using samplers for those sort of tasks…

    +1

    in reply to: Preview 2.36: Extended UI and mixer resizing. #19247
    Levendis
    Participant

    Hi Frits,

    @Zynewave wrote:

    @omar misa wrote:

    Podium is guaranteed to crash on my system when a particular zoom level is set in the mixer.

    Can’t reproduce the crash here. Can you give me some more details about how you provoke the crash?

    In your screenshot I can see you were dragging the zoom slider. Did you drag from below or above the point where it crashed?

    – From above.

    @Zynewave wrote:

    Does it happen with any of your arrangements?

    – Just one so far.

    @Zynewave wrote:

    If not, then please email me a project file with the track layout that causes the crash.

    Here is the project file which crashes (a work in progress). I have limited technical abilities thus struggle to give you more details.

    Thanks for your time.

    in reply to: Preview 2.36: Extended UI and mixer resizing. #19238
    Levendis
    Participant

    Podium is guaranteed to crash on my system when a particular zoom level is set in the mixer.

    WinXP. No problems with beta4.

    in reply to: Your one stop .pod shop?!!? #19191
    Levendis
    Participant

    @4mica wrote:

    …I propose we have one place to store all of the .pod files that anybody can contribute to.

    +1 to this suggestion (though I’d like to give it a +∞).

    @4mica wrote:

    If it were given a big fat link on the front page, another in the forums(sticky by the music lounge maybe?)…

    Nucleum Music .pod files too?!

    @4mica wrote:

    Is this a good idea?

    Great idea. What about a ‘File’ menu entry similar to ‘Save Project As…’? eg. ‘Upload Project to Zynewave.com’ (abbreviated to something appropriate).

    in reply to: The Podium Music Lounge #19172
    Levendis
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    “Allow It” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMQimSs_b8Y

    I envy your talents. Your techno was solid and the video suited the atmos. A DJ would surely include this in a set.

    in reply to: Preview 2.34: Minor consistency updates #18856
    Levendis
    Participant

    @LiquidProj3ct wrote:

    Composite tracks for midi too

    Great suggestion!!!

    in reply to: Tap Tempo #18819
    Levendis
    Participant

    Alt+E brings up the Edit menu?!

    How about Alt+Click the Metronome button? …to tap in a tempo. The last tempo object (before edit cursor) would then be adjusted.

    Sorry, I realise this message is posted after the release of v.2.33 #-o

    in reply to: Preview 2.34: Minor consistency updates #18818
    Levendis
    Participant

    @Zynewave wrote:

    That way I can refer to the menus as “Contents menu” and “Devices menu”, yet the button labels still show the more detailed description. Objections?

    “Contents” and “Devices” on buttons and in the manual are appropriate abbreviations.

    Personally I liked andyy815‘s suggestion of “project elements”. Adapted, this would leave you with “Elements” and “Devices”, a less prosaic alternative.

    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Levendis
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: Restricted to Podium license owners
    Levendis
    Participant
    This content is restricted to Podium license owners.
    in reply to: ‘Set Segment around Loop’ command. #18568
    Levendis
    Participant

    thank you thcilnnahoj. SHIFT+Q/W totally slipped my radar.

    in reply to: zRoute #18562
    Levendis
    Participant

    A modular environment delivers a plethora of routing possibilities.

    I started sequencing with Jeskola Buzz and now miss it’s Machines page.

    Sadly, I suspect this method is anathema to Podium’s established hierarchical track structure.

    in reply to: Nucleum Music #18463
    Levendis
    Participant

    @rinxai wrote:

    Chasing a Sofa – Nucleum demo track by rinxai.

    –>A lot of grooviness out of a minimal arrangement. 😉

    ‘LeAVES’ – do as you wish.

    in reply to: Branches off the hierarchy #18462
    Levendis
    Participant

    @siegfried wrote:

    what is difference between dry/wet knob and your “send level”?

    I’ve not been successful at implementing the “send level” on an fx slot (a delay unit for instance, which I’d like to vary input amounts from child tracks). Send busses will achieve this but often requires reconfiguring tracks. Please refer to Fruity Loops’ mixer fx slots for the type of wet/dry I mean. Thank you for your thoughts.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 300 total)
© 2021 Zynewave