rinxai's Forum Page

@Lion wrote:

I’ve never had any real *problems* with Podium, more like small issues with certain lack of features that don’t really make or break a DAW program for me. But, this is beside the point.

…instead of announcing that you’re no longer using a piece of software just simply stop using it….. That is all

QFT

@CymaticCreation wrote:

6. In-track automation. This can be midi cc parameters, vst parameters or preferably both. They are already there, but making them available in the midi editor as well right next to velocity, release etc, will be a huge workflow improvement.

7. MIDI effects, midi track <-> audio track routing.

8. Global MIDI CC learn.

+1

Welcome Telenator. Like 4mica, I too believe a lot of folk are missing out on Podium, which while missing a few key features, is perfectly usable and as you say – gracefull. IMO, it does a great job of getting out the way and allowing for creative juices to flow relatively unencumbered.

Cheers

+1
😉

@LiquidProj3ct wrote:

….It could be useful for future midi controller linking even.

Yes, I too would like that this update lay the basis for something like an easy midi learn function to map parameters to hardware controllers.

Great idea. Will be rummaging through deeply buried piles for uploadables. 🙂

@swindus wrote:

For me MIDI plugs are also more important than time stretching.

+1

Time-stretched audio usually sounds dodgy to me ears. Many times have I come across a tune with that distinctive warbling sound of a clip stretched in ableton, so off putting.